Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

STIM vs ABSI vs RXRX vs ELMD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
STIM
Neuronetics, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$128M
5Y Perf.-86.1%
ABSI
Absci Corporation

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$894M
5Y Perf.-79.8%
RXRX
Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.46B
5Y Perf.-89.2%
ELMD
Electromed, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareAMEX • US
Market Cap$222M
5Y Perf.+128.8%

STIM vs ABSI vs RXRX vs ELMD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
STIM logoSTIM
ABSI logoABSI
RXRX logoRXRX
ELMD logoELMD
IndustryMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Devices
Market Cap$128M$894M$1.46B$222M
Revenue (TTM)$152M$2M$66M$69M
Net Income (TTM)$-37M$-118M$-560M$9M
Gross Margin48.0%-13.4%-34.4%78.2%
Operating Margin-19.4%-60.3%-8.8%16.7%
Forward P/E24.4x
Total Debt$90M$5M$78M$198K
Cash & Equiv.$34M$20M$743M$15M

STIM vs ABSI vs RXRX vs ELMDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

STIM
ABSI
RXRX
ELMD
StockJul 21May 26Return
Neuronetics, Inc. (STIM)10013.9-86.1%
Absci Corporation (ABSI)10020.2-79.8%
Recursion Pharmaceu… (RXRX)10010.8-89.2%
Electromed, Inc. (ELMD)100228.8+128.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: STIM vs ABSI vs RXRX vs ELMD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ELMD leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Neuronetics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. ABSI also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
STIM
Neuronetics, Inc.
The Growth Play

STIM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 99.2%, EPS growth 57.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.8%
  • 99.2% revenue growth vs ABSI's -38.2%
Best for: growth exposure
ABSI
Absci Corporation
The Momentum Pick

ABSI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +116.2% vs STIM's -59.6%
Best for: momentum
RXRX
Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Growth Angle

RXRX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ELMD
Electromed, Inc.
The Income Pick

ELMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 1.03
  • 482.6% 10Y total return vs ABSI's -73.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 4.31x
  • Beta 1.03, current ratio 4.31x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSTIM logoSTIM99.2% revenue growth vs ABSI's -38.2%
Quality / MarginsELMD logoELMD13.1% margin vs ABSI's -73.1%
Stability / SafetyELMD logoELMDBeta 1.03 vs RXRX's 3.18, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ABSI logoABSI+116.2% vs STIM's -59.6%
Efficiency (ROA)ELMD logoELMD16.4% ROA vs ABSI's -54.7%, ROIC 25.6% vs -58.0%

STIM vs ABSI vs RXRX vs ELMD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

STIMNeuronetics, Inc.
FY 2025
Clinical Services Segment
58.3%$87M
Medical Device Segment
41.7%$62M
ABSIAbsci Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

RXRXRecursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
License and Service
99.4%$74M
Grant
0.6%$425,000
ELMDElectromed, Inc.
FY 2024
Home Care
50.4%$841,000
Other
49.6%$826,000

STIM vs ABSI vs RXRX vs ELMD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLELMDLAGGINGRXRX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ELMD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

STIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $152M annually — 93.5x ABSI's $2M. ELMD is the more profitable business, keeping 13.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABSI's -73.1%. On growth, ELMD holds the edge at +16.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSTIM logoSTIMNeuronetics, Inc.ABSI logoABSIAbsci CorporationRXRX logoRXRXRecursion Pharmac…ELMD logoELMDElectromed, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$152M$2M$66M$69M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$27M-$116M-$521M$12M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$37M-$118M-$560M$9M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4M-$99M-$326M$9M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+48.0%-13.4%-34.4%+78.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-19.4%-60.3%-8.8%+16.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-24.5%-73.1%-8.4%+13.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.6%-60.8%-4.9%+13.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+7.8%-100.0%-56.1%+16.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+23.8%+9.5%+56.0%+45.5%
ELMD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — STIM and ABSI and RXRX each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricSTIM logoSTIMNeuronetics, Inc.ABSI logoABSIAbsci CorporationRXRX logoRXRXRecursion Pharmac…ELMD logoELMDElectromed, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$128M$894M$1.5B$222M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$184M$879M$797M$207M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.12x-6.85x-2.27x31.23x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.42x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple19.14x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.86x319.22x19.58x3.47x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.62x4.15x1.29x5.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF20.06x
Evenly matched — STIM and ABSI and RXRX each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ELMD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

ELMD delivers a 19.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-140 for STIM. ELMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STIM's 3.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ELMD scores 7/9 vs RXRX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSTIM logoSTIMNeuronetics, Inc.ABSI logoABSIAbsci CorporationRXRX logoRXRXRecursion Pharmac…ELMD logoELMDElectromed, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-139.8%-63.6%-54.3%+19.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-27.1%-54.7%-40.6%+16.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-26.6%-58.0%-95.8%+25.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-28.5%-65.9%-50.1%+22.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94447
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage3.44x0.03x0.07x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$56M-$15M-$665M-$15M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$34M$20M$743M$15M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$90M$5M$78M$198,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.43x-865.97x-336.46x
ELMD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ABSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ELMD five years ago would be worth $27,805 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,179 for RXRX. Over the past 12 months, ABSI leads with a +116.2% total return vs STIM's -59.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABSI at 59.4% vs RXRX's -16.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSTIM logoSTIMNeuronetics, Inc.ABSI logoABSIAbsci CorporationRXRX logoRXRXRecursion Pharmac…ELMD logoELMDElectromed, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+27.8%+59.3%-22.1%-1.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-59.6%+116.2%-22.0%+22.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-16.4%+304.9%-41.6%+144.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.7%-73.4%-88.2%+178.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.4%-73.4%-81.8%+482.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-5.8%+59.4%-16.4%+34.7%
ABSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ABSI and ELMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ELMD is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RXRX's 3.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABSI currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs STIM's 37.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSTIM logoSTIMNeuronetics, Inc.ABSI logoABSIAbsci CorporationRXRX logoRXRXRecursion Pharmac…ELMD logoELMDElectromed, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.90x2.82x3.18x1.03x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.85$6.24$7.18$30.73
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.80$2.24$2.80$17.73
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+37.9%+92.2%+45.5%+87.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.683.649.556.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.0M4.4M12.5M41K
Evenly matched — ABSI and ELMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: STIM as "Buy", ABSI as "Buy", RXRX as "Hold", ELMD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 334.8% upside for STIM (target: $8) vs 7.1% for ABSI (target: $6).

MetricSTIM logoSTIMNeuronetics, Inc.ABSI logoABSIAbsci CorporationRXRX logoRXRXRecursion Pharmac…ELMD logoELMDElectromed, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.00$6.16$11.00$38.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts712104
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+4.5%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ELMD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ABSI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallElectromed, Inc. (ELMD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

STIM vs ABSI vs RXRX vs ELMD: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is STIM or ABSI or RXRX or ELMD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Neuronetics, Inc.

(STIM) is the stronger pick with 99. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -38. 2% for Absci Corporation (ABSI). Electromed, Inc. (ELMD) offers the better valuation at 31. 2x trailing P/E (24. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Neuronetics, Inc. (STIM) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — STIM or ABSI or RXRX or ELMD?

Over the past 5 years, Electromed, Inc.

(ELMD) delivered a total return of +178. 1%, compared to -88. 2% for Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ELMD returned +482. 6% versus STIM's -93. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — STIM or ABSI or RXRX or ELMD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Electromed, Inc.

(ELMD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 3. 18β — meaning RXRX is approximately 209% more volatile than ELMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Electromed, Inc. (ELMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for Neuronetics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — STIM or ABSI or RXRX or ELMD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Neuronetics, Inc.

(STIM) is pulling ahead at 99. 2% versus -38. 2% for Absci Corporation (ABSI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Neuronetics, Inc. grew EPS 57. 2% year-over-year, compared to 10. 6% for Absci Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, STIM leads at 31. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — STIM or ABSI or RXRX or ELMD?

Electromed, Inc.

(ELMD) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 8% net margin versus -41. 1% for Absci Corporation — meaning it keeps 11. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ELMD leads at 15. 1% versus -44. 5% for ABSI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ELMD leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is STIM or ABSI or RXRX or ELMD more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STIM: 334.

8% to $8. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — STIM or ABSI or RXRX or ELMD?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is STIM or ABSI or RXRX or ELMD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Electromed, Inc.

(ELMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), +482. 6% 10Y return). Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX) carries a higher beta of 3. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ELMD: +482. 6%, RXRX: -81. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between STIM and ABSI and RXRX and ELMD?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: STIM is a small-cap high-growth stock; ABSI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RXRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; ELMD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

STIM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ABSI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RXRX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ELMD

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform STIM and ABSI and RXRX and ELMD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(STIM: 7.8% · ABSI: -100.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.