Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
STKH vs BYND vs SMPL vs TSN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Agricultural Farm Products
STKH vs BYND vs SMPL vs TSN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Agricultural Farm Products |
| Market Cap | $145K | $414M | $1.24B | $24.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10K | $265M | $1.45B | $55.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $244M | $91M | $453M |
| Gross Margin | -120.0% | 3.5% | 34.0% | 6.6% |
| Operating Margin | -66.9% | -82.4% | 14.4% | 2.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 7.5x | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $508M | $304M | $8.83B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $208M | $98M | $1.23B |
STKH vs BYND vs SMPL vs TSN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steakholder Foods L… (STKH) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) | 100 | 0.7 | -99.3% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 40.9 | -59.1% |
| Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN) | 100 | 91.4 | -8.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STKH vs BYND vs SMPL vs TSN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STKH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 41.4% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6%
BYND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 92.2% margin vs STKH's -803.0%
- 39.3% ROA vs STKH's -137.1%, ROIC -44.4% vs -131.2%
SMPL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth -26.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 3.64x
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 17.5x)
TSN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 2.9%
- 23.1% 10Y total return vs SMPL's 3.7%
- Beta 0.33, yield 2.9%, current ratio 1.55x
- Beta 0.33 vs BYND's 1.67
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 41.4% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 17.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 92.2% margin vs STKH's -803.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs BYND's 1.67 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.8% vs STKH's -92.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.3% ROA vs STKH's -137.1%, ROIC -44.4% vs -131.2% |
STKH vs BYND vs SMPL vs TSN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STKH vs BYND vs SMPL vs TSN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SMPL leads in 3 of 6 categories
TSN leads 2 • STKH leads 0 • BYND leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSN is the larger business by revenue, generating $55.7B annually — 5571000.0x STKH's $10,000. BYND is the more profitable business, keeping 92.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STKH's -803.0%. On growth, TSN holds the edge at +4.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10,000 | $265M | $1.4B | $55.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50,998 | -$187M | $231M | $2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $244M | $91M | $453M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | -$134M | $174M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -120.0% | +3.5% | +34.0% | +6.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -66.9% | -82.4% | +14.4% | +2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -803.0% | +92.2% | +6.3% | +0.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -761.1% | -50.6% | +12.0% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -15.3% | -0.3% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +93.5% | +90.9% | -31.6% | +36.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SMPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, SMPL trades at a 76% valuation discount to TSN's 49.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SMPL's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TSN's 11.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $145,339 | $414M | $1.2B | $24.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | $714M | $1.4B | $31.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.02x | -0.49x | 12.20x | 49.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 7.45x | 17.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.51x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 5.97x | 11.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.53x | 1.50x | 0.86x | 0.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.04x | — | 0.70x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 7.86x | 20.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SMPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SMPL delivers a 5.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-195 for STKH. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STKH's 0.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSN scores 6/9 vs BYND's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -195.3% | — | +5.2% | +2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -137.1% | +39.3% | +3.7% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -131.2% | -44.4% | +8.1% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -117.3% | -40.3% | +9.4% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | — | 0.17x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | $300M | $206M | $7.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $208M | $98M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $508M | $304M | $8.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -27.78x | -11.47x | 6.77x | 2.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TSN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TSN five years ago would be worth $9,840 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for STKH. Over the past 12 months, TSN leads with a +26.8% total return vs STKH's -92.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSN at 13.3% vs STKH's -82.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.3% | +1.3% | -36.4% | +17.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -92.8% | -64.9% | -64.8% | +26.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -93.1% | -67.8% | +45.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -99.2% | -64.3% | -1.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -98.6% | +3.7% | +23.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -82.0% | -59.1% | -31.5% | +13.3% |
Risk & Volatility
TSN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TSN is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BYND's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSN currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs STKH's 6.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.57x | 1.67x | 0.38x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.72 | $7.69 | $36.92 | $69.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.12 | $0.50 | $10.21 | $50.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.1% | +11.6% | +33.7% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 60.7 | 42.9 | 64.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 59.5M | 2.8M | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BYND as "Sell", SMPL as "Buy", TSN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4889.9% upside for BYND (target: $45) vs 3.4% for TSN (target: $70). TSN is the only dividend payer here at 2.95% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $44.55 | $20.17 | $70.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 | 24 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% | +0.8% |
SMPL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TSN leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
STKH vs BYND vs SMPL vs TSN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STKH or BYND or SMPL or TSN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger pick with 9.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STKH or BYND or SMPL or TSN?
On trailing P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the cheapest at 12.
2x versus Tyson Foods, Inc. at 49. 9x. On forward P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company is actually cheaper at 7. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STKH or BYND or SMPL or TSN?
Over the past 5 years, Tyson Foods, Inc.
(TSN) delivered a total return of -1. 6%, compared to -99. 9% for Steakholder Foods Ltd. (STKH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSN returned +23. 1% versus STKH's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STKH or BYND or SMPL or TSN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tyson Foods, Inc.
(TSN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus Beyond Meat, Inc. 's 1. 67β — meaning BYND is approximately 404% more volatile than TSN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 61% for Steakholder Foods Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STKH or BYND or SMPL or TSN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is pulling ahead at 9.
0% versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Steakholder Foods Ltd. grew EPS 69. 7% year-over-year, compared to -39. 6% for Tyson Foods, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMPL leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STKH or BYND or SMPL or TSN?
Beyond Meat, Inc.
(BYND) is the more profitable company, earning 79. 8% net margin versus -852. 1% for Steakholder Foods Ltd. — meaning it keeps 79. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus -847. 6% for STKH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMPL leads at 35. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STKH or BYND or SMPL or TSN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) trades at 7.
5x forward P/E versus 17. 5x for Tyson Foods, Inc. — 10. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BYND: 4889. 9% to $44. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — STKH or BYND or SMPL or TSN?
In this comparison, TSN (2.
9% yield) pays a dividend. STKH, BYND, SMPL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STKH or BYND or SMPL or TSN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tyson Foods, Inc.
(TSN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 2. 9% yield). Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TSN: +23. 1%, BYND: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STKH and BYND and SMPL and TSN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STKH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BYND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock; TSN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TSN pays a dividend while STKH, BYND, SMPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.