Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
STKL vs BYND
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
STKL vs BYND — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $769M | $414M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $818M | $265M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $244M |
| Gross Margin | 14.3% | 3.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.9% | -82.4% |
| Forward P/E | 42.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $372M | $508M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $169K | $208M |
STKL vs BYND — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SunOpta Inc. (STKL) | 100 | 138.6 | +38.6% |
| Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) | 100 | 0.8 | -99.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STKL vs BYND
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STKL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.30
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 186.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 38.0% 10Y total return vs BYND's -98.6%
BYND is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 92.2% margin vs STKL's 1.9%
- 39.3% ROA vs STKL's 2.3%, ROIC -44.4% vs 5.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 92.2% margin vs STKL's 1.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs BYND's 1.67 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.5% vs BYND's -64.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.3% ROA vs STKL's 2.3%, ROIC -44.4% vs 5.9% |
STKL vs BYND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STKL vs BYND — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STKL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STKL is the larger business by revenue, generating $818M annually — 3.1x BYND's $265M. BYND is the more profitable business, keeping 92.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STKL's 1.9%. On growth, STKL holds the edge at +13.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $818M | $265M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $80M | -$187M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $244M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | -$134M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.3% | +3.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | -82.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +92.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | -50.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.2% | -15.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +158.6% | +90.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — STKL and BYND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $769M | $414M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $714M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 50.00x | -0.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 42.35x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.70x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.94x | 1.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.36x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 36.24x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
STKL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STKL scores 8/9 vs BYND's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.3% | +39.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | -44.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.7% | -40.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.00x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $372M | $300M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $169,000 | $208M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $372M | $508M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.73x | -11.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STKL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STKL five years ago would be worth $5,707 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $81 for BYND. Over the past 12 months, STKL leads with a +43.5% total return vs BYND's -64.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STKL at -6.8% vs BYND's -59.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +75.2% | +1.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +43.5% | -64.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.1% | -93.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.9% | -99.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.0% | -98.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.8% | -59.1% |
Risk & Volatility
STKL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STKL is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BYND's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STKL currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs BYND's 11.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 1.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.94 | $7.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.32 | $0.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.7% | +11.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.2 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 59.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates STKL as "Buy" and BYND as "Sell". Consensus price targets imply 4889.9% upside for BYND (target: $45) vs 23.1% for STKL (target: $8).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $44.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
STKL leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
STKL vs BYND: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STKL or BYND a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SunOpta Inc.
(STKL) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). SunOpta Inc. (STKL) offers the better valuation at 50. 0x trailing P/E (42. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SunOpta Inc. (STKL) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — STKL or BYND?
Over the past 5 years, SunOpta Inc.
(STKL) delivered a total return of -42. 9%, compared to -99. 2% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STKL returned +38. 0% versus BYND's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — STKL or BYND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SunOpta Inc.
(STKL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus Beyond Meat, Inc. 's 1. 67β — meaning BYND is approximately 29% more volatile than STKL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — STKL or BYND?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SunOpta Inc.
(STKL) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SunOpta Inc. grew EPS 186. 7% year-over-year, compared to 24. 7% for Beyond Meat, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STKL leads at 11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — STKL or BYND?
Beyond Meat, Inc.
(BYND) is the more profitable company, earning 79. 8% net margin versus 1. 9% for SunOpta Inc. — meaning it keeps 79. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STKL leads at 5. 4% versus -84. 7% for BYND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STKL leads at 14. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is STKL or BYND more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BYND: 4889.
9% to $44. 55.
07Which pays a better dividend — STKL or BYND?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is STKL or BYND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SunOpta Inc.
(STKL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 30)). Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STKL: +38. 0%, BYND: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between STKL and BYND?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.