Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
STKL vs BYND vs HAIN vs SMPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
STKL vs BYND vs HAIN vs SMPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $769M | $414M | $84M | $1.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $818M | $265M | $1.51B | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $244M | $-544M | $91M |
| Gross Margin | 14.3% | 3.5% | 20.0% | 34.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.9% | -82.4% | -31.8% | 14.4% |
| Forward P/E | 42.3x | — | — | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $372M | $508M | $779M | $304M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $169K | $208M | $54M | $98M |
STKL vs BYND vs HAIN vs SMPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SunOpta Inc. (STKL) | 100 | 138.6 | +38.6% |
| Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) | 100 | 0.8 | -99.2% |
| The Hain Celestial … (HAIN) | 100 | 2.1 | -97.9% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 78.5 | -21.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STKL vs BYND vs HAIN vs SMPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STKL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 186.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 38.0% 10Y total return vs SMPL's 3.7%
- 13.0% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6%
- +43.5% vs BYND's -64.9%
BYND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 92.2% margin vs HAIN's -36.1%
- 39.3% ROA vs HAIN's -36.8%, ROIC -44.4% vs -23.7%
HAIN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SMPL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.38
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 3.64x
- Beta 0.38, current ratio 3.64x
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 92.2% margin vs HAIN's -36.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs HAIN's 2.12, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.5% vs BYND's -64.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.3% ROA vs HAIN's -36.8%, ROIC -44.4% vs -23.7% |
STKL vs BYND vs HAIN vs SMPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STKL vs BYND vs HAIN vs SMPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SMPL leads in 3 of 6 categories
STKL leads 1 • BYND leads 0 • HAIN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 5.7x BYND's $265M. BYND is the more profitable business, keeping 92.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HAIN's -36.1%. On growth, STKL holds the edge at +13.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $818M | $265M | $1.5B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $80M | -$187M | -$430M | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $244M | -$544M | $91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | -$134M | $5M | $174M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.3% | +3.5% | +20.0% | +34.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | -82.4% | -31.8% | +14.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +92.2% | -36.1% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | -50.6% | +0.3% | +12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.2% | -15.3% | -6.7% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +158.6% | +90.9% | -11.3% | -31.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SMPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, SMPL trades at a 76% valuation discount to STKL's 50.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SMPL's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STKL's 13.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $769M | $414M | $84M | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $714M | $808M | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 50.00x | -0.49x | -0.13x | 12.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 42.35x | — | — | 7.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.70x | — | — | 5.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.94x | 1.50x | 0.05x | 0.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.36x | — | 0.14x | 0.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 36.24x | — | — | 7.86x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SMPL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STKL delivers a 9.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-165 for HAIN. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STKL's 2.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STKL scores 8/9 vs HAIN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.3% | — | -164.7% | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.3% | +39.3% | -36.8% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | -44.4% | -23.7% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.7% | -40.3% | -29.2% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.00x | — | 1.64x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $372M | $300M | $725M | $206M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $169,000 | $208M | $54M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $372M | $508M | $779M | $304M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.73x | -11.47x | -8.60x | 6.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STKL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STKL five years ago would be worth $5,707 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $81 for BYND. Over the past 12 months, STKL leads with a +43.5% total return vs BYND's -64.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STKL at -6.8% vs HAIN's -65.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +75.2% | +1.3% | -29.8% | -36.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +43.5% | -64.9% | -49.2% | -64.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.1% | -93.1% | -95.8% | -67.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.9% | -99.2% | -98.2% | -64.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.0% | -98.6% | -98.5% | +3.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.8% | -59.1% | -65.3% | -31.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STKL and SMPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HAIN's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STKL currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs BYND's 11.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 1.67x | 2.12x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.94 | $7.69 | $2.22 | $36.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.32 | $0.50 | $0.55 | $10.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.7% | +11.6% | +33.2% | +33.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.2 | 60.7 | 47.8 | 42.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 59.5M | 1.2M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STKL as "Buy", BYND as "Sell", HAIN as "Hold", SMPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4889.9% upside for BYND (target: $45) vs 23.1% for STKL (target: $8).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $44.55 | $1.17 | $20.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 21 | 44 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +1.7% | +4.1% |
SMPL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). STKL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
STKL vs BYND vs HAIN vs SMPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STKL or BYND or HAIN or SMPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SunOpta Inc.
(STKL) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SunOpta Inc. (STKL) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STKL or BYND or HAIN or SMPL?
On trailing P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the cheapest at 12.
2x versus SunOpta Inc. at 50. 0x. On forward P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company is actually cheaper at 7. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STKL or BYND or HAIN or SMPL?
Over the past 5 years, SunOpta Inc.
(STKL) delivered a total return of -42. 9%, compared to -99. 2% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STKL returned +38. 0% versus BYND's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STKL or BYND or HAIN or SMPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 's 2. 12β — meaning HAIN is approximately 460% more volatile than SMPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 2% for SunOpta Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STKL or BYND or HAIN or SMPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SunOpta Inc.
(STKL) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SunOpta Inc. grew EPS 186. 7% year-over-year, compared to -601. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STKL leads at 11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STKL or BYND or HAIN or SMPL?
Beyond Meat, Inc.
(BYND) is the more profitable company, earning 79. 8% net margin versus -34. 0% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 79. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus -84. 7% for BYND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMPL leads at 35. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STKL or BYND or HAIN or SMPL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) trades at 7.
5x forward P/E versus 42. 3x for SunOpta Inc. — 34. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BYND: 4889. 9% to $44. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — STKL or BYND or HAIN or SMPL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is STKL or BYND or HAIN or SMPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
38)). The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMPL: +3. 7%, HAIN: -98. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STKL and BYND and HAIN and SMPL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STKL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BYND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HAIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.