Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
STKL vs VITL vs FRPT vs HAIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Farm Products
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
STKL vs VITL vs FRPT vs HAIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Agricultural Farm Products | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $769M | $426M | $2.74B | $84M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $818M | $784M | $1.14B | $1.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $48M | $200M | $-544M |
| Gross Margin | 14.3% | 35.2% | 38.9% | 20.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.9% | 8.2% | 8.8% | -31.8% |
| Forward P/E | 42.3x | 10.4x | 41.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $372M | $53M | $560M | $779M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $169K | $49M | $278M | $54M |
STKL vs VITL vs FRPT vs HAIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SunOpta Inc. (STKL) | 100 | 98.8 | -1.2% |
| Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) | 100 | 38.7 | -61.3% |
| Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT) | 100 | 70.2 | -29.8% |
| The Hain Celestial … (HAIN) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STKL vs VITL vs FRPT vs HAIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STKL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 38.0% 10Y total return vs FRPT's 5.2%
- +43.5% vs VITL's -73.5%
VITL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.31
- Rev growth 25.3%, EPS growth 22.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 15.2%, current ratio 2.16x
- Beta 0.31, current ratio 2.16x
FRPT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 17.6% margin vs HAIN's -36.1%
- 11.4% ROA vs HAIN's -36.8%, ROIC 5.3% vs -23.7%
HAIN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.3% revenue growth vs HAIN's -10.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs HAIN's -36.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs HAIN's 2.12, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.5% vs VITL's -73.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs HAIN's -36.8%, ROIC 5.3% vs -23.7% |
STKL vs VITL vs FRPT vs HAIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STKL vs VITL vs FRPT vs HAIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FRPT leads in 1 of 6 categories
HAIN leads 1 • VITL leads 1 • STKL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRPT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 1.9x VITL's $784M. FRPT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HAIN's -36.1%. On growth, VITL holds the edge at +15.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $818M | $784M | $1.1B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $80M | $78M | $165M | -$430M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $48M | $200M | -$544M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | -$90M | $223M | $5M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.3% | +35.2% | +38.9% | +20.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +8.2% | +8.8% | -31.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +6.1% | +17.6% | -36.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | -11.4% | +19.6% | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.2% | +15.4% | +13.1% | -6.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +158.6% | -108.1% | +4.5% | -11.3% |
Valuation Metrics
HAIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.6x trailing earnings, VITL trades at a 87% valuation discount to STKL's 50.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VITL's 4.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FRPT's 16.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $769M | $426M | $2.7B | $84M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $431M | $3.0B | $808M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 50.00x | 6.61x | 21.16x | -0.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 42.35x | 10.38x | 41.11x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.17x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.70x | 4.22x | 16.62x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.94x | 0.56x | 2.49x | 0.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.36x | 1.25x | 2.59x | 0.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 36.24x | — | 221.45x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
VITL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FRPT delivers a 17.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-165 for HAIN. VITL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STKL's 2.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STKL scores 8/9 vs VITL's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.3% | +14.5% | +17.0% | -164.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.3% | +10.0% | +11.4% | -36.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | +26.9% | +5.3% | -23.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.7% | +26.1% | +6.0% | -29.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.00x | 0.15x | 0.46x | 1.64x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $372M | $5M | $282M | $725M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $169,000 | $49M | $278M | $54M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $372M | $53M | $560M | $779M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.73x | 39.83x | 13.29x | -8.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — STKL and FRPT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STKL five years ago would be worth $5,707 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $182 for HAIN. Over the past 12 months, STKL leads with a +43.5% total return vs VITL's -73.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRPT at -6.2% vs HAIN's -65.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +75.2% | -68.1% | -7.1% | -29.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +43.5% | -73.5% | -31.1% | -49.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.1% | -38.2% | -17.4% | -95.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.9% | -54.4% | -68.4% | -98.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.0% | -73.0% | +517.3% | -98.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.8% | -14.8% | -6.2% | -65.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STKL and VITL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VITL is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HAIN's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STKL currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs VITL's 17.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 0.31x | 0.91x | 2.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.94 | $53.13 | $89.80 | $2.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.32 | $8.40 | $46.76 | $0.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.7% | +17.9% | +62.2% | +33.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.2 | 38.9 | 29.1 | 47.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 3.3M | 1.5M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STKL as "Buy", VITL as "Buy", FRPT as "Buy", HAIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 316.3% upside for VITL (target: $40) vs 23.1% for STKL (target: $8).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $39.63 | $73.42 | $1.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 15 | 29 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.7% |
FRPT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). HAIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
STKL vs VITL vs FRPT vs HAIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STKL or VITL or FRPT or HAIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) is the stronger pick with 25. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) offers the better valuation at 6. 6x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SunOpta Inc. (STKL) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STKL or VITL or FRPT or HAIN?
On trailing P/E, Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) is the cheapest at 6. 6x versus SunOpta Inc. at 50. 0x. On forward P/E, Vital Farms, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STKL or VITL or FRPT or HAIN?
Over the past 5 years, SunOpta Inc.
(STKL) delivered a total return of -42. 9%, compared to -98. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRPT returned +517. 3% versus HAIN's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STKL or VITL or FRPT or HAIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 's 2. 12β — meaning HAIN is approximately 577% more volatile than VITL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 2% for SunOpta Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STKL or VITL or FRPT or HAIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) is pulling ahead at 25. 3% versus -10. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SunOpta Inc. grew EPS 186. 7% year-over-year, compared to -601. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VITL leads at 28. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STKL or VITL or FRPT or HAIN?
Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 6% net margin versus -34. 0% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VITL leads at 11. 6% versus -29. 6% for HAIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRPT leads at 38. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STKL or VITL or FRPT or HAIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 42. 3x for SunOpta Inc. — 32. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VITL: 316. 3% to $39. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — STKL or VITL or FRPT or HAIN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is STKL or VITL or FRPT or HAIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 31)). The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VITL: -73. 0%, HAIN: -98. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STKL and VITL and FRPT and HAIN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STKL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VITL is a small-cap high-growth stock; FRPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HAIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.