Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Stellantis N.V. (STLA) vs Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) vs General Motors Company (GM) vs Ford Motor Company (F) vs Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TM | 6.5% revenue growth vs STLA's -17.2% |
| Value | TM | Lower P/E (0.1x vs 6.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | TM | 9.4% net margin vs GM's 1.8% |
| Stability / Safety | HMC | Beta 0.83 vs STLA's 1.60, lower leverage |
| Dividends | STLA | 22.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs F's 5.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | GM | +61.4% vs STLA's -30.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | STLA | 5.4% ROA vs GM's 1.2%, ROIC 3.6% vs 1.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Stellantis is a global automotive manufacturer that designs, produces, and sells a diverse portfolio of passenger cars, trucks, and commercial vehicles across multiple brands. It generates revenue primarily through vehicle sales — with Jeep, Ram, and Peugeot as key volume drivers — supplemented by parts, services, and financing operations. The company's competitive advantage lies in its massive scale and brand portfolio spanning mainstream, premium, and luxury segments, which provides cost efficiencies and market coverage across Europe, North America, and other regions.
Toyota is one of the world's largest automakers, manufacturing and selling vehicles across nearly every segment — from compact cars to luxury sedans and trucks. It generates most of its revenue from automotive sales (around 90%), supplemented by financial services (about 8%) that provide financing and leasing to customers. The company's key advantage is its legendary manufacturing efficiency — particularly the Toyota Production System — which delivers industry-leading quality and cost control while pioneering hybrid technology with its Prius platform.
General Motors is a global automotive manufacturer that designs, builds, and sells vehicles under brands like Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick, and GMC. It generates revenue primarily from vehicle sales — with North America contributing about 80% of automotive revenue — supplemented by financing operations through GM Financial and connected services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its massive scale and manufacturing efficiency, established dealer network, and growing investments in electric vehicles and autonomous driving technology through its Cruise subsidiary.
Ford Motor Company is a global automotive manufacturer that designs, builds, and sells Ford trucks, SUVs, commercial vehicles, and Lincoln luxury cars. It generates revenue primarily through vehicle sales (~90% of revenue) and its Ford Credit financing arm (~10%), which provides loans and leases to customers and dealers. The company's competitive advantage lies in its iconic brand recognition—particularly in trucks and commercial vehicles—and its extensive global manufacturing and dealer network.
Honda is a global automotive and mobility company that manufactures and sells motorcycles, automobiles, and power products worldwide. It generates revenue primarily from vehicle sales—with automobiles contributing roughly 75% of revenue and motorcycles around 15%—supplemented by financial services and power equipment. Honda's competitive advantage lies in its engineering excellence and brand reputation for reliability, particularly in fuel-efficient engines and motorcycle technology.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 5 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
F leads in 1 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics). STLA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
TM is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.39T annually — 266.9x GM's $185.0B. TM is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GM's 1.8%. On growth, F holds the edge at +9.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | STLAStellantis N.V. | TMToyota Motor Corp… | GMGeneral Motors Co… | FFord Motor Company | HMCHonda Motor Co., … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $322.3B | $49.39T | $185.0B | $189.6B | $21.34T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21.6B | $6.59T | $17.5B | $9.4B | $1.52T |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $10.9B | $4.63T | $3.3B | $4.7B | $496.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11.4B | $147.8B | $11.1B | $11.9B | $11.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +18.0% | +6.3% | +7.5% | +20.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +8.8% | +1.6% | +1.9% | +3.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +9.4% | +1.8% | +2.5% | +2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +0.3% | +6.0% | +6.3% | +0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.7% | +8.2% | -5.1% | +9.4% | -3.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -141.9% | +65.7% | -135.3% | +172.7% | -40.0% |
Valuation Metrics
At 3.7x trailing earnings, STLA trades at a 85% valuation discount to GM's 24.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TM offers better value at 0.52x vs STLA's 2.74x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | STLAStellantis N.V. | TMToyota Motor Corp… | GMGeneral Motors Co… | FFord Motor Company | HMCHonda Motor Co., … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23.4B | $315.9B | $71.2B | $55.2B | $39.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27.1B | $506.8B | $180.5B | $195.2B | $38.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.73x | 10.53x | 24.07x | -6.84x | 8.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.55x | 0.08x | 6.40x | 9.21x | 0.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.74x | 0.52x | — | — | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.10x | 11.23x | 12.12x | — | 3.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 1.03x | 0.38x | 0.29x | 0.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.25x | 1.35x | 1.21x | 1.56x | 0.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 6.43x | 2.60x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
STLA delivers a 14.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $4 for HMC. HMC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to F's 4.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GM scores 6/9 vs F's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | STLAStellantis N.V. | TMToyota Motor Corp… | GMGeneral Motors Co… | FFord Motor Company | HMCHonda Motor Co., … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.8% | +12.0% | +5.2% | +9.9% | +3.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.4% | +4.7% | +1.2% | +1.6% | +1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | +5.6% | +1.3% | -3.8% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | +7.7% | +1.6% | -5.2% | +5.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | 1.05x | 2.06x | 4.54x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.1B | $29.81T | $109.3B | $140.0B | -$106.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34.1B | $8.98T | $20.9B | $23.4B | $4.53T |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $37.2B | $38.79T | $130.3B | $163.3B | $4.42T |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.30x | 38.49x | 3.79x | 5.36x | 13.59x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in TM five years ago would be worth $17,804 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,061 for STLA. Over the past 12 months, GM leads with a +61.4% total return vs STLA's -30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GM at 27.4% vs STLA's -11.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | STLAStellantis N.V. | TMToyota Motor Corp… | GMGeneral Motors Co… | FFord Motor Company | HMCHonda Motor Co., … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.2% | +11.2% | -2.8% | +6.8% | +0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.3% | +36.7% | +61.4% | +53.9% | +13.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.6% | +89.4% | +106.8% | +34.4% | +30.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.4% | +78.0% | +52.8% | +47.1% | +25.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.4% | +174.4% | +194.7% | +61.5% | +56.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.9% | +23.7% | +27.4% | +10.4% | +9.2% |
Risk & Volatility
HMC is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STLA's 1.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TM currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs STLA's 61.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | STLAStellantis N.V. | TMToyota Motor Corp… | GMGeneral Motors Co… | FFord Motor Company | HMCHonda Motor Co., … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.60x | 0.93x | 0.89x | 0.85x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.14 | $248.90 | $87.62 | $14.79 | $34.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.03 | $155.00 | $41.60 | $8.44 | $24.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.6% | +97.4% | +89.8% | +95.3% | +86.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.5 | 59.2 | 47.7 | 61.1 | 44.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13.5M | 254K | 6.8M | 52.0M | 939K |
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STLA as "Hold", TM as "Hold", GM as "Buy", F as "Hold", HMC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 40.9% upside for STLA (target: $11) vs -26.0% for TM (target: $179). For income investors, STLA offers the higher dividend yield at 22.79% vs GM's 0.86%.
| Metric | STLAStellantis N.V. | TMToyota Motor Corp… | GMGeneral Motors Co… | FFord Motor Company | HMCHonda Motor Co., … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.40 | $179.41 | $89.93 | $13.19 | $31.51 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 15 | 51 | 46 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +22.8% | +2.3% | +0.9% | +5.3% | +4.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.56 | $863.50 | $0.68 | $0.75 | $223.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +15.1% | +2.4% | +8.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stellantis N.V. (STLA) | 100 | 80.23 | -19.8% |
| Toyota Motor Corpor… (TM) | 100 | 174.5 | +74.5% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | 100 | 268.2 | +168.2% |
| Ford Motor Company (F) | 100 | 191.81 | +91.8% |
| Honda Motor Co., Lt… (HMC) | 100 | 118.42 | +18.4% |
Toyota Motor Corpor… (TM) returned +78% over 5 years vs Stellantis N.V. (STLA)'s -19%. A $10,000 investment in TM 5 years ago would be worth $17,804 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stellantis N.V. (STLA) | $111.0B | $156.9B | +41.3% |
| Toyota Motor Corpor… (TM) | $28.4T | $48.0T | +69.1% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | $166.4B | $185.0B | +11.2% |
| Ford Motor Company (F) | $151.8B | $187.3B | +23.4% |
| Honda Motor Co., Lt… (HMC) | $14.6T | $21.7T | +48.5% |
Toyota Motor Corporation's revenue grew from $28.4T (2016) to $48.0T (2025) — a 6.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stellantis N.V. (STLA) | 1.6% | 3.5% | +114.8% |
| Toyota Motor Corpor… (TM) | 8.1% | 9.9% | +21.8% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | 5.7% | 1.5% | -74.3% |
| Ford Motor Company (F) | 3.0% | -4.4% | -244.5% |
| Honda Motor Co., Lt… (HMC) | 2.4% | 3.9% | +63.3% |
Toyota Motor Corporation's net margin went from 8% (2016) to 10% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stellantis N.V. (STLA) | 8 | 7.1 | -11.3% |
| Toyota Motor Corpor… (TM) | 0.1 | 0.1 | +0.0% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | 6 | 24.9 | +315.0% |
| Ford Motor Company (F) | 6.6 | 6.8 | +3.0% |
| Honda Motor Co., Lt… (HMC) | 0.1 | 0.1 | +0.0% |
Stellantis N.V. has traded in a 3x–9x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~4x. Toyota Motor Corporation has traded in a 0x–0x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~11x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stellantis N.V. (STLA) | 1.18 | 1.84 | +55.9% |
| Toyota Motor Corpor… (TM) | 1,470.7 | 3,595.6 | +144.5% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | 6 | 3.27 | -45.5% |
| Ford Motor Company (F) | 1.15 | -2.06 | -279.1% |
| Honda Motor Co., Lt… (HMC) | 191.16 | 536.79 | +180.8% |
Toyota Motor Corporation's EPS grew from $1470.70 (2016) to $3595.60 (2025) — a 10% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Stellantis N.V. generated $-7B FCF in 2024 (-183% vs 2021). Toyota Motor Corporation generated $-1.6T FCF in 2025 (-21617% vs 2021).
STLA vs TM vs GM vs F vs HMC: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STLA or TM or GM or F or HMC a better buy right now?
Stellantis N.V. (STLA) offers the better valuation at 3.7x trailing P/E (7.5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate General Motors Company (GM) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STLA or TM or GM or F or HMC?
On trailing P/E, Stellantis N.V. (STLA) is the cheapest at 3.7x versus General Motors Company at 24.1x. On forward P/E, Honda Motor Co., Ltd. is actually cheaper at 0.1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Toyota Motor Corporation wins at 0.00x versus Stellantis N.V.'s 5.56x — a PEG below 1.0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STLA or TM or GM or F or HMC?
Over the past 5 years, Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) delivered a total return of +78.0%, compared to -19.4% for Stellantis N.V. (STLA). A $10,000 investment in TM five years ago would be worth approximately $18K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GM returned +194.7% versus HMC's +56.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STLA or TM or GM or F or HMC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.83β versus Stellantis N.V.'s 1.60β — meaning STLA is approximately 93% more volatile than HMC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 5% for Ford Motor Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — STLA or TM or GM or F or HMC?
Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) is the more profitable company, earning 9.9% net margin versus -4.4% for Ford Motor Company — meaning it keeps 9.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TM leads at 10.0% versus -4.9% for F. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HMC leads at 21.5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is STLA or TM or GM or F or HMC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0.00x versus Stellantis N.V.'s 5.56x. A PEG below 1.0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC) trades at 0.1x forward P/E versus 9.2x for Ford Motor Company — 9.1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STLA: 40.9% to $11.40.
07Which pays a better dividend — STLA or TM or GM or F or HMC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Stellantis N.V. (STLA) offers the highest yield at 22.8%, versus 0.9% for General Motors Company (GM).
08Is STLA or TM or GM or F or HMC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, General Motors Company (GM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.89), 0.9% yield, +194.7% 10Y return). Stellantis N.V. (STLA) carries a higher beta of 1.60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GM: +194.7%, STLA: +173.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between STLA and TM and GM and F and HMC?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: STLA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TM is a large-cap deep-value stock; GM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; F is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; HMC is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.