Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
STRC vs CIFR vs MSTR vs MARA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Software - Application
Financial - Capital Markets
STRC vs CIFR vs MSTR vs MARA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Financial - Capital Markets | Software - Application | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $33.39B | $8.14B | $61.58B | $4.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $490M | $224M | $490M | $907M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12.36B | $-898M | $-12.36B | $-2.04B |
| Gross Margin | 68.1% | 28.4% | 68.1% | -47.7% |
| Operating Margin | 94.2% | -150.7% | 94.2% | -90.6% |
| Forward P/E | 3.4x | — | 3.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $8.28B | $2.77B | $8.28B | $3.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.30B | $628M | $2.30B | $547M |
STRC vs CIFR vs MSTR vs MARA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) | 100 | 203.7 | +103.7% |
| Strategy Inc (MSTR) | 100 | 1103.7 | +1003.7% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 588.9 | +488.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STRC vs CIFR vs MSTR vs MARA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 1.3%
- Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth -151.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 16.2%, current ratio 5.62x
- Beta 0.35, yield 1.3%, current ratio 5.62x
CIFR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 48.0% NII/revenue growth vs MSTR's 3.0%
- +5.4% vs MSTR's -54.5%
MSTR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.0% 10Y total return vs CIFR's 102.6%
MARA is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- -144.6% margin vs MSTR's -25.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.0% NII/revenue growth vs MSTR's 3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.4x vs 3.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -144.6% margin vs MSTR's -25.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs CIFR's 3.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MSTR's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.4% vs MSTR's -54.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -19.4% ROA vs MARA's -28.5%, ROIC -9.9% vs -9.0% |
STRC vs CIFR vs MSTR vs MARA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STRC vs CIFR vs MSTR vs MARA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
STRC leads in 3 of 6 categories
CIFR leads 1 • MSTR leads 0 • MARA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — STRC and MSTR each lead in 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 4.1x CIFR's $224M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -144.6% (MARA) to -25.2% (MSTR).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $490M | $224M | $490M | $907M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $480M | -$203M | $480M | -$102M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12.4B | -$898M | -$12.4B | -$2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7.6B | -$930M | $7.6B | -$385M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.1% | +28.4% | +68.1% | -47.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +94.2% | -150.7% | +94.2% | -90.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -25.2% | -3.7% | -25.2% | -144.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | -3.1% | +15.5% | -34.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | — | +11.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -132.0% | -154.5% | -132.0% | -113.5% |
Valuation Metrics
STRC leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33.4B | $8.1B | $61.6B | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $39.4B | $10.3B | $67.6B | $7.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.57x | -9.33x | -12.11x | -3.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.39x | — | 3.44x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 69.96x | 36.36x | 129.04x | 5.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.58x | 9.16x | 1.06x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — STRC and MSTR and MARA each lead in 3 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STRC delivers a -24.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-24 in annual profit, vs $-116 for CIFR. STRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIFR's 3.31x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -24.1% | -115.5% | -24.1% | -60.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.4% | -24.7% | -19.4% | -28.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.9% | -11.7% | -9.9% | -9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.6% | -15.6% | -12.6% | -12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 3.31x | 0.16x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.0B | $2.1B | $6.0B | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.3B | $628M | $2.3B | $547M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.3B | $2.8B | $8.3B | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.05x | -32.12x | 9.05x | 31.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CIFR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSTR five years ago would be worth $34,032 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,567 for MARA. Over the past 12 months, CIFR leads with a +536.8% total return vs MSTR's -54.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CIFR at 112.2% vs STRC's 6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.1% | +23.8% | +17.3% | +28.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.9% | +536.8% | -54.5% | -20.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.9% | +855.2% | +580.5% | +42.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.9% | +101.4% | +240.3% | -44.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.9% | +102.6% | +899.6% | -57.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.8% | +112.2% | +89.5% | +12.6% |
Risk & Volatility
STRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIFR's 3.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STRC currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs MSTR's 40.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 3.94x | 2.56x | 3.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $100.42 | $25.52 | $457.22 | $23.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $88.00 | $3.02 | $104.17 | $6.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +78.6% | +40.3% | +54.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.8 | 59.3 | 69.7 | 69.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 24.9M | 18.5M | 46.0M |
Analyst Outlook
STRC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STRC as "Hold", CIFR as "Buy", MSTR as "Buy", MARA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 152.0% upside for STRC (target: $252) vs 26.8% for MARA (target: $16). For income investors, STRC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.30% vs MSTR's 0.70%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $252.00 | $27.63 | $304.00 | $16.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 12 | 29 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | — | +0.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.30 | — | $1.30 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% | 0.0% | +1.0% |
STRC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). CIFR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
STRC vs CIFR vs MSTR vs MARA: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STRC or CIFR or MSTR or MARA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cipher Mining Inc.
(CIFR) is the stronger pick with 48. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Strategy Inc (MSTR). Analysts rate Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — STRC or CIFR or MSTR or MARA?
Over the past 5 years, Strategy Inc (MSTR) delivered a total return of +240.
3%, compared to -44. 3% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSTR returned +899. 6% versus MARA's -57. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — STRC or CIFR or MSTR or MARA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MicroStrategy Incorporated Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock (STRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
35β versus Cipher Mining Inc. 's 3. 94β — meaning CIFR is approximately 1010% more volatile than STRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MicroStrategy Incorporated Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock (STRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 3% for Cipher Mining Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — STRC or CIFR or MSTR or MARA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cipher Mining Inc.
(CIFR) is pulling ahead at 48. 0% versus 3. 0% for Strategy Inc (MSTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MicroStrategy Incorporated Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock grew EPS -151. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1435. 7% for Cipher Mining Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STRC leads at -1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — STRC or CIFR or MSTR or MARA?
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
(MARA) is the more profitable company, earning -144. 6% net margin versus -844. 8% for Strategy Inc — meaning it keeps -144. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MARA leads at -90. 6% versus -1140. 8% for MSTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STRC leads at 68. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is STRC or CIFR or MSTR or MARA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MicroStrategy Incorporated Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock (STRC) trades at 3.
4x forward P/E versus 3. 4x for Strategy Inc — 0. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STRC: 152. 0% to $252. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — STRC or CIFR or MSTR or MARA?
In this comparison, STRC (1.
3% yield), MSTR (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. CIFR, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is STRC or CIFR or MSTR or MARA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MicroStrategy Incorporated Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock (STRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
35), 1. 3% yield). Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) carries a higher beta of 3. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STRC: +21. 9%, MARA: -57. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between STRC and CIFR and MSTR and MARA?
These companies operate in different sectors (STRC (Technology) and CIFR (Financial Services) and MSTR (Technology) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: STRC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CIFR is a small-cap high-growth stock; MSTR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. STRC, MSTR pay a dividend while CIFR, MARA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.