Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
STRD vs MARA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
STRD vs MARA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $22.29B | $4.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $477M | $907M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3.85B | $-1.31B |
| Gross Margin | 68.7% | -47.7% |
| Operating Margin | -11.4% | -90.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $8.24B | $3.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.30B | $547M |
STRD vs MARA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MicroStrategy Incor… (STRD) | 100 | 84.5 | -15.5% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 81.0 | -19.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STRD vs MARA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STRD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.87
- -1.9% 10Y total return vs MARA's -51.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 16.1%, current ratio 5.62x
MARA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 38.2%, EPS growth -314.5%
- 38.2% NII/revenue growth vs STRD's 3.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs STRD's 12.1% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.2% NII/revenue growth vs STRD's 3.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs STRD's 12.1% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs MARA's 3.11, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.9% vs MARA's -4.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs STRD's 12.1% |
STRD vs MARA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STRD vs MARA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MARA leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 1.9x STRD's $477M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -144.6% (MARA) to -8.1% (STRD).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $477M | $907M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9.3B | $627M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3.8B | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$46M | -$312M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.7% | -47.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.4% | -90.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.1% | -144.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -34.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.2% | -4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
STRD leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22.3B | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28.2B | $7.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.98x | -3.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.00x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 46.71x | 5.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.41x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MARA leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STRD delivers a -8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-8 in annual profit, vs $-31 for MARA. STRD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.0% | -30.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.3% | -17.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.6% | -9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.6% | -12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.9B | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.3B | $547M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.2B | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -39.91x | 4.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — STRD and MARA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STRD five years ago would be worth $9,810 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,054 for MARA. Over the past 12 months, STRD leads with a -1.9% total return vs MARA's -4.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MARA at 10.8% vs STRD's -0.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.6% | +28.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.9% | -4.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.9% | +36.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.9% | -59.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.9% | -51.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.6% | +10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
STRD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STRD is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MARA's 3.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STRD currently trades 78.3% from its 52-week high vs MARA's 54.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 3.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $96.81 | $23.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $64.17 | $6.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.3% | +54.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.6 | 69.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 92K | 47.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $16.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% |
MARA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). STRD leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
STRD vs MARA: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STRD or MARA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
(MARA) is the stronger pick with 38. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for MicroStrategy Incorporated 10. 00% Series A Perpetual Stride Preferred Stock (STRD). Analysts rate Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — STRD or MARA?
Over the past 5 years, MicroStrategy Incorporated 10.
00% Series A Perpetual Stride Preferred Stock (STRD) delivered a total return of -1. 9%, compared to -59. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STRD returned -1. 9% versus MARA's -51. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — STRD or MARA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MicroStrategy Incorporated 10.
00% Series A Perpetual Stride Preferred Stock (STRD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 11β — meaning MARA is approximately 256% more volatile than STRD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MicroStrategy Incorporated 10. 00% Series A Perpetual Stride Preferred Stock (STRD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — STRD or MARA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
(MARA) is pulling ahead at 38. 2% versus 3. 0% for MicroStrategy Incorporated 10. 00% Series A Perpetual Stride Preferred Stock (STRD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MicroStrategy Incorporated 10. 00% Series A Perpetual Stride Preferred Stock grew EPS -151. 3% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — STRD or MARA?
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
(MARA) is the more profitable company, earning -144. 6% net margin versus -806. 3% for MicroStrategy Incorporated 10. 00% Series A Perpetual Stride Preferred Stock — meaning it keeps -144. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MARA leads at -90. 6% versus -1140. 8% for STRD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STRD leads at 68. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — STRD or MARA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is STRD or MARA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MicroStrategy Incorporated 10.
00% Series A Perpetual Stride Preferred Stock (STRD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87)). Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) carries a higher beta of 3. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STRD: -1. 9%, MARA: -51. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between STRD and MARA?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STRD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.