Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
STRD vs MSTR vs SMLR vs BTBT vs MARA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Medical - Devices
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
STRD vs MSTR vs SMLR vs BTBT vs MARA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Software - Application | Medical - Devices | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $22.29B | $60.05B | $311M | $589M | $4.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $477M | $490M | $37M | $164M | $907M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3.85B | $-12.36B | $48M | $137M | $-1.31B |
| Gross Margin | 68.7% | 68.1% | 90.8% | 61.9% | -47.7% |
| Operating Margin | -11.4% | 94.2% | -94.7% | 16.8% | -90.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1.4x | 2.4x | 4.0x | 9.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $8.24B | $8.28B | $70K | $14M | $3.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.30B | $2.30B | $9M | $95M | $547M |
STRD vs MSTR vs SMLR vs BTBT vs MARA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MicroStrategy Incor… (STRD) | 100 | 85.0 | -15.0% |
| Strategy Inc (MSTR) | 100 | 46.4 | -53.6% |
| Semler Scientific, … (SMLR) | 100 | 39.5 | -60.5% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 82.2 | -17.8% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 82.5 | -17.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STRD vs MSTR vs SMLR vs BTBT vs MARA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STRD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 16.1%, current ratio 5.62x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.87 vs BTBT's 3.37
- -1.9% vs MSTR's -54.2%
MSTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.59, yield 0.7%
- 8.6% 10Y total return vs SMLR's 11.1%
- Beta 2.59, yield 0.7%, current ratio 5.62x
- 0.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
SMLR is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 130.8% margin vs MSTR's -25.2%
BTBT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and bank quality is your priority.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs SMLR's -17.4%
- 19.0% ROA vs MSTR's -19.4%, ROIC 6.5% vs -9.9%
Among these 5 stocks, MARA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs SMLR's -17.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 130.8% margin vs MSTR's -25.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs BTBT's 3.37 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.9% vs MSTR's -54.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs MSTR's -19.4%, ROIC 6.5% vs -9.9% |
STRD vs MSTR vs SMLR vs BTBT vs MARA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
STRD vs MSTR vs SMLR vs BTBT vs MARA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSTR leads in 3 of 6 categories
STRD leads 1 • SMLR leads 0 • BTBT leads 0 • MARA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 24.5x SMLR's $37M. SMLR is the more profitable business, keeping 130.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSTR's -25.2%. On growth, MSTR holds the edge at +11.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $477M | $490M | $37M | $164M | $907M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9.3B | $480M | -$35M | $166M | $627M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3.8B | -$12.4B | $48M | $137M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$46M | $7.6B | -$389M | -$448M | -$312M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.7% | +68.1% | +90.8% | +61.9% | -47.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.4% | +94.2% | -94.7% | +16.8% | -90.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.1% | -25.2% | +130.8% | +17.3% | -144.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +15.5% | -10.5% | -65.3% | -34.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +11.9% | -44.6% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.2% | -132.0% | +48.6% | +2.8% | -4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — STRD and BTBT each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.0x trailing earnings, SMLR trades at a 57% valuation discount to BTBT's 9.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BTBT's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SMLR's 14.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22.3B | $60.1B | $311M | $589M | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28.2B | $66.0B | $302M | $508M | $7.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.98x | -11.81x | 3.96x | 9.15x | -3.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.45x | 2.37x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.18x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 14.04x | 8.49x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 46.71x | 125.83x | 5.52x | 3.60x | 5.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.41x | 1.04x | 0.70x | 0.56x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SMLR and BTBT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-31 for MARA. SMLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs MARA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.0% | -24.1% | +10.5% | +21.4% | -30.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.3% | -19.4% | +8.1% | +19.0% | -17.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.6% | -9.9% | +13.3% | +6.5% | -9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.6% | -12.6% | +13.7% | +8.5% | -12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.16x | 0.00x | 0.03x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.9B | $6.0B | -$9M | -$81M | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.3B | $2.3B | $9M | $95M | $547M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.2B | $8.3B | $70,000 | $14M | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -39.91x | 9.05x | -12.85x | — | 4.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MSTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSTR five years ago would be worth $28,983 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,543 for BTBT. Over the past 12 months, STRD leads with a -1.9% total return vs MSTR's -54.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSTR at 82.7% vs BTBT's -7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.6% | +14.4% | +14.3% | -10.3% | +28.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.9% | -54.2% | -38.5% | -9.0% | -4.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.9% | +510.2% | -18.9% | -19.7% | +36.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.9% | +189.8% | -81.8% | -84.6% | -59.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.9% | +855.6% | +1110.1% | -60.4% | -51.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.6% | +82.7% | -6.8% | -7.1% | +10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
STRD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STRD is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STRD currently trades 78.3% from its 52-week high vs MSTR's 39.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.85x | 2.59x | 2.35x | 3.41x | 3.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $96.81 | $457.22 | $50.44 | $4.55 | $23.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $64.17 | $104.17 | $14.88 | $1.25 | $6.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.3% | +39.3% | +40.3% | +40.2% | +54.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.6 | 68.8 | 52.4 | 69.1 | 69.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 92K | 18.8M | 0 | 18.5M | 47.6M |
Analyst Outlook
MSTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MSTR as "Buy", SMLR as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy", MARA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 27.0% for MARA (target: $16). For income investors, MSTR offers the higher dividend yield at 0.72% vs BTBT's 0.31%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $280.83 | $50.50 | $5.00 | $16.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 29 | 7 | 2 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | — | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.30 | — | $0.01 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% |
MSTR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). STRD leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
STRD vs MSTR vs SMLR vs BTBT vs MARA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STRD or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or MARA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR). Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR) offers the better valuation at 4. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Strategy Inc (MSTR) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STRD or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or MARA?
On trailing P/E, Semler Scientific, Inc.
(SMLR) is the cheapest at 4. 0x versus Bit Digital, Inc. at 9. 2x. On forward P/E, MicroStrategy Incorporated 10. 00% Series A Perpetual Stride Preferred Stock is actually cheaper at 1. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STRD or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or MARA?
Over the past 5 years, Strategy Inc (MSTR) delivered a total return of +189.
8%, compared to -84. 6% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMLR returned +1110% versus BTBT's -61. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STRD or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or MARA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MicroStrategy Incorporated 10.
00% Series A Perpetual Stride Preferred Stock (STRD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 85β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 41β — meaning BTBT is approximately 303% more volatile than STRD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STRD or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or MARA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -17. 4% for Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMLR leads at 2. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STRD or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or MARA?
Semler Scientific, Inc.
(SMLR) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 7% net margin versus -844. 8% for Strategy Inc — meaning it keeps 72. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMLR leads at 37. 2% versus -1140. 8% for STRD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMLR leads at 91. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STRD or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or MARA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MicroStrategy Incorporated 10.
00% Series A Perpetual Stride Preferred Stock (STRD) trades at 1. 4x forward P/E versus 2. 4x for Strategy Inc — 0. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 173. 2% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — STRD or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or MARA?
In this comparison, MSTR (0.
7% yield), BTBT (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. STRD, SMLR, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STRD or MSTR or SMLR or BTBT or MARA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Strategy Inc (MSTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
7% yield, +855. 6% 10Y return). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSTR: +855. 6%, BTBT: -61. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STRD and MSTR and SMLR and BTBT and MARA?
These companies operate in different sectors (STRD (Financial Services) and MSTR (Technology) and SMLR (Healthcare) and BTBT (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: STRD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MSTR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SMLR is a small-cap deep-value stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. MSTR pays a dividend while STRD, SMLR, BTBT, MARA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.