Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
STRT vs ALSN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
STRT vs ALSN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $317M | $10.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $586M | $3.65B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $27M | $543M |
| Gross Margin | 16.6% | 40.8% |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | 24.1% |
| Forward P/E | 12.1x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $2.92B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $85M | $1.50B |
STRT vs ALSN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strattec Security C… (STRT) | 100 | 588.0 | +488.0% |
| Allison Transmissio… (ALSN) | 100 | 338.5 | +238.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STRT vs ALSN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STRT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth 12.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.7%
- 5.1% revenue growth vs ALSN's -6.7%
- Lower P/E (12.1x vs 14.1x)
ALSN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 0.8%
- 386.6% 10Y total return vs STRT's 50.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, current ratio 4.85x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% revenue growth vs ALSN's -6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.1x vs 14.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.9% margin vs STRT's 4.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs STRT's 1.53 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +115.5% vs ALSN's +32.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.4% ROA vs STRT's 7.0%, ROIC 22.2% vs 8.7% |
STRT vs ALSN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STRT vs ALSN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALSN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALSN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.6B annually — 6.2x STRT's $586M. ALSN is the more profitable business, keeping 14.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STRT's 4.6%. On growth, ALSN holds the edge at +83.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $586M | $3.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $46M | $970M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $27M | $543M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $68M | $713M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +40.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | +24.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | +14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | +19.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.9% | +83.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | -40.4% |
Valuation Metrics
STRT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.6x trailing earnings, STRT trades at a 5% valuation discount to ALSN's 17.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, STRT's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALSN's 11.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $317M | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $244M | $12.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.56x | 17.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.12x | 14.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.49x | 10.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.56x | 3.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.25x | 5.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.91x | 16.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALSN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALSN delivers a 29.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $11 for STRT. STRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALSN's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STRT scores 7/9 vs ALSN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.9% | +29.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.0% | +8.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | +22.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.8% | +18.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 1.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$73M | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $85M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $2.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 51.67x | 64.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — STRT and ALSN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALSN five years ago would be worth $29,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,700 for STRT. Over the past 12 months, STRT leads with a +115.5% total return vs ALSN's +32.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STRT at 59.6% vs ALSN's 39.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.2% | +29.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +115.5% | +32.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +306.3% | +171.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.0% | +198.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.7% | +386.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +59.6% | +39.6% |
Risk & Volatility
ALSN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALSN is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STRT's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALSN currently trades 92.9% from its 52-week high vs STRT's 82.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.53x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $92.50 | $137.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.26 | $76.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.0% | +92.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.1 | 50.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 84K | 830K |
Analyst Outlook
ALSN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates STRT as "Hold" and ALSN as "Hold". ALSN is the only dividend payer here at 0.84% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $116.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.1% |
ALSN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). STRT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
STRT vs ALSN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STRT or ALSN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) is the stronger pick with 5.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN). Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) offers the better valuation at 16. 6x trailing P/E (12. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STRT or ALSN?
On trailing P/E, Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) is the cheapest at 16.
6x versus Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. at 17. 4x. On forward P/E, Strattec Security Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STRT or ALSN?
Over the past 5 years, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) delivered a total return of +198. 2%, compared to +67. 0% for Strattec Security Corporation (STRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALSN returned +386. 6% versus STRT's +50. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STRT or ALSN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus Strattec Security Corporation's 1. 53β — meaning STRT is approximately 38% more volatile than ALSN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 156% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STRT or ALSN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) is pulling ahead at 5.
1% versus -6. 7% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Strattec Security Corporation grew EPS 12. 5% year-over-year, compared to -11. 8% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STRT leads at 7. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STRT or ALSN?
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 7% net margin versus 3. 3% for Strattec Security Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALSN leads at 32. 3% versus 4. 0% for STRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALSN leads at 48. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STRT or ALSN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) trades at 12.
1x forward P/E versus 14. 1x for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — STRT or ALSN?
In this comparison, ALSN (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. STRT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STRT or ALSN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11), 0. 8% yield, +386. 6% 10Y return). Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) carries a higher beta of 1. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALSN: +386. 6%, STRT: +50. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STRT and ALSN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
ALSN pays a dividend while STRT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.