SUIG vs UTSI

For growth investors, UTStarcom Holdings Corp.

(UTSI) is the stronger pick with -30. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -128. 3% for SUI Group Holdings Limited (SUIG). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, UTStarcom Holdings Corp.

(UTSI) delivered a total return of -48. 2%, compared to -69. 1% for SUI Group Holdings Limited (SUIG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SUIG returned -65. 3% versus UTSI's -68. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), UTStarcom Holdings Corp.

(UTSI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 18β versus SUI Group Holdings Limited's 3. 67β — meaning SUIG is approximately 1978% more volatile than UTSI relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), UTStarcom Holdings Corp.

(UTSI) is pulling ahead at -30. 9% versus -128. 3% for SUI Group Holdings Limited (SUIG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UTStarcom Holdings Corp. grew EPS -14. 3% year-over-year, compared to -37. 6% for SUI Group Holdings Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

SUI Group Holdings Limited (SUIG) is the more profitable company, earning 262.

8% net margin versus -40. 2% for UTStarcom Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 262. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SUIG leads at 264. 9% versus -67. 4% for UTSI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SUIG leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, UTStarcom Holdings Corp.

(UTSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 18)). SUI Group Holdings Limited (SUIG) carries a higher beta of 3. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UTSI: -68. 2%, SUIG: -65. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (SUIG (Financial Services) and UTSI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.