Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SUNE vs SHLS vs RUN vs SPWR vs FSLR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SUNE
SUNation Energy Inc.

Engineering & Construction

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6M
5Y Perf.-99.8%
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.48B
5Y Perf.+63.4%
RUN
Sunrun Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.49B
5Y Perf.+1.1%
SPWR
SunPower Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$925M
5Y Perf.-48.1%
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$23.63B
5Y Perf.+13.1%

SUNE vs SHLS vs RUN vs SPWR vs FSLR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SUNE logoSUNE
SHLS logoSHLS
RUN logoRUN
SPWR logoSPWR
FSLR logoFSLR
IndustryEngineering & ConstructionSolarSolarSolarSolar
Market Cap$6M$1.48B$3.49B$925M$23.63B
Revenue (TTM)$72M$536M$3.17B$315M$5.42B
Net Income (TTM)$-11M$34M$568M$-42M$1.67B
Gross Margin38.3%33.5%23.5%50.4%41.7%
Operating Margin-2.3%11.2%-1.8%-2.7%33.0%
Forward P/E21.5x15.3x5.5x12.4x
Total Debt$5M$175M$14.89B$188M$499M
Cash & Equiv.$7M$7M$1.24B$10M$2.80B

SUNE vs SHLS vs RUN vs SPWR vs FSLRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SUNE
SHLS
RUN
SPWR
FSLR
StockOct 24May 26Return
SUNation Energy Inc. (SUNE)1000.2-99.8%
Shoals Technologies… (SHLS)100163.4+63.4%
Sunrun Inc. (RUN)100101.1+1.1%
SunPower Inc. (SPWR)10051.9-48.1%
First Solar, Inc. (FSLR)100113.1+13.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SUNE vs SHLS vs RUN vs SPWR vs FSLR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FSLR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. RUN and SPWR also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SUNE
SUNation Energy Inc.
The Income Pick

SUNE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 2.11
  • 1.1K% 10Y total return vs FSLR's 334.7%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

SHLS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +83.4% vs SPWR's -37.7%
Best for: momentum
RUN
Sunrun Inc.
The Growth Play

RUN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 45.1%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
  • 45.1% revenue growth vs SPWR's 2.9%
Best for: growth exposure
SPWR
SunPower Inc.
The Value Play

SPWR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (5.5x vs 12.4x)
Best for: value
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

FSLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
  • Beta 1.36, current ratio 2.67x
  • 30.7% margin vs SUNE's -15.1%
  • Beta 1.36 vs RUN's 2.81, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRUN logoRUN45.1% revenue growth vs SPWR's 2.9%
ValueSPWR logoSPWRLower P/E (5.5x vs 12.4x)
Quality / MarginsFSLR logoFSLR30.7% margin vs SUNE's -15.1%
Stability / SafetyFSLR logoFSLRBeta 1.36 vs RUN's 2.81, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SHLS logoSHLS+83.4% vs SPWR's -37.7%
Efficiency (ROA)FSLR logoFSLR12.6% ROA vs SUNE's -23.4%, ROIC 17.6% vs -5.0%

SUNE vs SHLS vs RUN vs SPWR vs FSLR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SUNESUNation Energy Inc.
FY 2014
Solar
62.3%$1.6B
Semiconductor
32.8%$840M
Terraform
4.9%$126M
SHLSShoals Technologies Group, Inc.
FY 2025
System Solutions
78.7%$374M
Components
21.3%$101M
RUNSunrun Inc.
FY 2025
Service
30.8%$1.8B
Customer Agreements
28.9%$1.7B
Product
19.2%$1.1B
Energy Systems
14.9%$878M
Manufactured Product, Other
4.4%$260M
Incentives
1.9%$111M
SPWRSunPower Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Subsegments
100.0%$109M
FSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
FY 2025
Solar Module
100.0%$15.0B

SUNE vs SHLS vs RUN vs SPWR vs FSLR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSUNELAGGINGSPWR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FSLR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FSLR is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 75.4x SUNE's $72M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SUNE's -15.1%. On growth, SUNE holds the edge at +77.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSUNE logoSUNESUNation Energy I…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$72M$536M$3.2B$315M$5.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$830,615$73M$541M-$6M$2.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$11M$34M$568M-$42M$1.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$955,000-$77M-$751M-$15M$1.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+38.3%+33.5%+23.5%+50.4%+41.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.3%+11.2%-1.8%-2.7%+33.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-15.1%+6.3%+17.9%-13.2%+30.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+1.3%-14.5%-23.6%-4.6%+30.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+77.0%+74.9%+43.2%-0.2%+23.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+100.2%+2.1%-101.3%+65.1%
FSLR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SUNE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 8.5x trailing earnings, RUN trades at a 81% valuation discount to SHLS's 44.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SUNE's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHLS's 25.4x.

MetricSUNE logoSUNESUNation Energy I…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$6M$1.5B$3.5B$925M$23.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4M$1.7B$17.1B$1.1B$21.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.38x44.20x8.54x-16.29x15.48x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.21.48x15.26x5.45x12.39x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.50x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.54x25.41x24.67x9.64x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.08x3.12x1.18x3.00x4.53x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.17x2.48x0.80x2.48x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.89x19.91x
SUNE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-53 for SUNE. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RUN's 2.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SUNE scores 7/9 vs SPWR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSUNE logoSUNESUNation Energy I…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-52.5%+5.7%+12.4%+18.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-23.4%+3.7%+2.5%-19.5%+12.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-5.0%+5.9%-0.5%-5.3%+17.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-6.5%+7.6%-0.6%-7.2%+15.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975657
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.22x0.29x2.99x0.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$2M$168M$13.6B$179M-$2.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7M$7M$1.2B$10M$2.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5M$175M$14.9B$188M$499M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-3.90x5.91x-0.02x-1.57x53.51x
FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SUNE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SUNE five years ago would be worth $7,704,192 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,000 for SPWR. Over the past 12 months, SHLS leads with a +83.4% total return vs SPWR's -37.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSLR at 7.4% vs SUNE's -89.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSUNE logoSUNESUNation Energy I…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+52.8%-2.8%-24.8%-33.9%-19.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-19.1%+83.4%+71.9%-37.7%+64.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-55.2%-15.0%-80.0%+23.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+76941.9%-70.0%-64.2%-80.0%+204.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+107450.2%-71.5%+97.7%-80.0%+334.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-89.2%-23.5%-5.3%-41.5%+7.4%
SUNE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SHLS and FSLR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FSLR is the less volatile stock with a 1.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RUN's 2.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHLS currently trades 77.8% from its 52-week high vs SUNE's 47.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSUNE logoSUNESUNation Energy I…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.11x2.23x2.81x2.15x1.36x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.46$11.36$22.44$2.27$285.99
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.68$3.81$5.38$0.81$127.33
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+47.7%+77.8%+65.1%+48.0%+76.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.354.855.745.160.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.6M5.1M10.3M1.7M2.0M
Evenly matched — SHLS and FSLR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: SHLS as "Buy", RUN as "Buy", SPWR as "Hold", FSLR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1350.5% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs -1.0% for SHLS (target: $9).

MetricSUNE logoSUNESUNation Energy I…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.75$18.25$15.81$251.82
# AnalystsCovering analysts23374573
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2311
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.1%
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

FSLR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SUNE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallSUNation Energy Inc. (SUNE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SUNE vs SHLS vs RUN vs SPWR vs FSLR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SUNE or SHLS or RUN or SPWR or FSLR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the stronger pick with 45. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 9% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SUNE or SHLS or RUN or SPWR or FSLR?

On trailing P/E, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. at 44. 2x. On forward P/E, SunPower Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SUNE or SHLS or RUN or SPWR or FSLR?

Over the past 5 years, SUNation Energy Inc.

(SUNE) delivered a total return of +769. 4%, compared to -80. 0% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SUNE returned +1075% versus SPWR's -80. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SUNE or SHLS or RUN or SPWR or FSLR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 36β versus Sunrun Inc. 's 2. 81β — meaning RUN is approximately 106% more volatile than FSLR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for Sunrun Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SUNE or SHLS or RUN or SPWR or FSLR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is pulling ahead at 45. 1% versus 2. 9% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for SunPower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SUNE or SHLS or RUN or SPWR or FSLR?

First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -15. 1% for SUNation Energy Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -4. 3% for RUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWR leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SUNE or SHLS or RUN or SPWR or FSLR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, SunPower Inc.

(SPWR) trades at 5. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 5x for Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. — 16. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1350. 5% to $15. 81.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SUNE or SHLS or RUN or SPWR or FSLR?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is SUNE or SHLS or RUN or SPWR or FSLR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+334. 7% 10Y return). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FSLR: +334. 7%, SPWR: -80. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SUNE and SHLS and RUN and SPWR and FSLR?

These companies operate in different sectors (SUNE (Industrials) and SHLS (Energy) and RUN (Energy) and SPWR (Energy) and FSLR (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SUNE is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock; RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SUNE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 38%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHLS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 37%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RUN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 21%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPWR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FSLR

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SUNE and SHLS and RUN and SPWR and FSLR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SUNE: 77.0% · SHLS: 74.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.