Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SUPV vs ITUB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
SUPV vs ITUB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $751M | $90.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.33T | $384.58B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-48.45B | $44.86B |
| Gross Margin | 39.5% | 34.5% |
| Operating Margin | -4.8% | 13.1% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 1.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.05T | $1.01T |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.60T | $270.61B |
SUPV vs ITUB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grupo Supervielle S… (SUPV) | 100 | 435.5 | +335.5% |
| Itaú Unibanco Holdi… (ITUB) | 100 | 257.2 | +157.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SUPV vs ITUB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SUPV is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.51, current ratio 4.06x
- NIM 12.1% vs ITUB's 1.2%
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 1.7x)
ITUB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 10.4%
- Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth 4.0%
- 188.7% 10Y total return vs SUPV's -18.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.0% NII/revenue growth vs SUPV's 13.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 1.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs SUPV's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs SUPV's 2.51 | |
| Dividends | 10.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SUPV's 3.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.4% vs SUPV's -39.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs SUPV's 0.4% |
SUPV vs ITUB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITUB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SUPV is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.33T annually — 6.0x ITUB's $384.6B. ITUB is the more profitable business, keeping 11.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SUPV's -2.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.33T | $384.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$73.4B | $57.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$48.4B | $44.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$725.2B | $117.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.5% | +34.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | +13.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +11.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -48.6% | +33.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -157.4% | -11.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SUPV leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $751M | $90.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $356M | $240.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -18.25x | 10.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 1.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.45x | 1.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 2.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ITUB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITUB delivers a 20.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-5 for SUPV. SUPV carries lower financial leverage with a 1.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ITUB's 4.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ITUB scores 4/9 vs SUPV's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.2% | +20.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.7% | +1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.7% | +3.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.6% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.04x | 4.71x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$549.2B | $742.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.60T | $270.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.05T | $1.01T |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.11x | 0.23x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SUPV and ITUB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SUPV five years ago would be worth $49,964 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $24,900 for ITUB. Over the past 12 months, ITUB leads with a +44.4% total return vs SUPV's -39.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SUPV at 57.8% vs ITUB's 26.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.5% | +14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -39.8% | +44.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +292.6% | +102.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +399.6% | +149.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.9% | +188.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +57.8% | +26.5% |
Risk & Volatility
ITUB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITUB is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SUPV's 2.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ITUB currently trades 85.2% from its 52-week high vs SUPV's 50.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.51x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.90 | $9.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.54 | $6.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.8% | +85.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.9 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 834K | 24.5M |
Analyst Outlook
ITUB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SUPV as "Sell" and ITUB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -18.4% upside for SUPV (target: $7) vs -22.0% for ITUB (target: $6). For income investors, ITUB offers the higher dividend yield at 10.45% vs SUPV's 3.67%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $6.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.7% | +10.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $437.61 | $4.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.7% |
ITUB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SUPV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SUPV vs ITUB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SUPV or ITUB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Itaú Unibanco Holding S.
A. (ITUB) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 7% for Grupo Supervielle S. A. (SUPV). Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. (ITUB) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (1. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. (ITUB) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SUPV or ITUB?
On forward P/E, Grupo Supervielle S.
A. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SUPV or ITUB?
Over the past 5 years, Grupo Supervielle S.
A. (SUPV) delivered a total return of +399. 6%, compared to +149. 0% for Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. (ITUB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ITUB returned +188. 7% versus SUPV's -18. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SUPV or ITUB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Itaú Unibanco Holding S.
A. (ITUB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus Grupo Supervielle S. A. 's 2. 51β — meaning SUPV is approximately 127% more volatile than ITUB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grupo Supervielle S. A. (SUPV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 104% versus 5% for Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SUPV or ITUB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Itaú Unibanco Holding S.
A. (ITUB) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus 13. 7% for Grupo Supervielle S. A. (SUPV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. grew EPS 4. 0% year-over-year, compared to -145. 9% for Grupo Supervielle S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SUPV or ITUB?
Itaú Unibanco Holding S.
A. (ITUB) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus -2. 4% for Grupo Supervielle S. A. — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITUB leads at 13. 1% versus -4. 8% for SUPV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SUPV leads at 39. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SUPV or ITUB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Grupo Supervielle S.
A. (SUPV) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 1. 7x for Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SUPV: -18. 4% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SUPV or ITUB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. (ITUB) offers the highest yield at 10. 4%, versus 3. 7% for Grupo Supervielle S. A. (SUPV).
09Is SUPV or ITUB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Itaú Unibanco Holding S.
A. (ITUB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11), 10. 4% yield, +188. 7% 10Y return). Grupo Supervielle S. A. (SUPV) carries a higher beta of 2. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITUB: +188. 7%, SUPV: -18. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SUPV and ITUB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SUPV is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ITUB is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.