SUUN vs RUN

For growth investors, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the stronger pick with 45. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 9% for PowerBank Corporation (SUUN). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (21. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sunrun Inc. (RUN) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) delivered a total return of -72. 5%, compared to -86. 5% for PowerBank Corporation (SUUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RUN returned +71. 1% versus SUUN's -86. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PowerBank Corporation (SUUN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

75β versus Sunrun Inc. 's 2. 89β — meaning RUN is approximately 65% more volatile than SUUN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sunrun Inc. (RUN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 4% for PowerBank Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is pulling ahead at 45. 1% versus -28. 9% for PowerBank Corporation (SUUN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to -654. 5% for PowerBank Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SUUN leads at 31. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -74. 7% for PowerBank Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RUN leads at -4. 3% versus -20. 3% for SUUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RUN leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, PowerBank Corporation (SUUN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.

Sunrun Inc. (RUN) carries a higher beta of 2. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SUUN: -86. 5%, RUN: +71. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (SUUN (Utilities) and RUN (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SUUN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.