Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SVCO vs COHU vs ONTO vs INTC vs AMD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
SVCO vs COHU vs ONTO vs INTC vs AMD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $361M | $2.33B | $14.16B | $627.10B | $742.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $67M | $481M | $1.03B | $53.76B | $37.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-28M | $-56M | $106M | $-3.17B | $4.99B |
| Gross Margin | 80.4% | 25.7% | 48.8% | 35.4% | 50.3% |
| Operating Margin | -47.8% | -10.6% | 10.0% | -9.4% | 11.7% |
| Forward P/E | 170.0x | 85.0x | 39.9x | 116.5x | 62.4x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $359M | $17M | $46.59B | $4.47B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $227M | $346M | $14.27B | $5.54B |
SVCO vs COHU vs ONTO vs INTC vs AMD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silvaco Group, Inc.… (SVCO) | 100 | 62.9 | -37.1% |
| Cohu, Inc. (COHU) | 100 | 153.7 | +53.7% |
| Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) | 100 | 131.4 | +31.4% |
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 404.8 | +304.8% |
| Advanced Micro Devi… (AMD) | 100 | 272.7 | +172.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SVCO vs COHU vs ONTO vs INTC vs AMD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SVCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.55, Low D/E 4.1%, current ratio 1.20x
- Beta 1.55 vs ONTO's 2.60
COHU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.12
- Beta 2.12, current ratio 6.88x
ONTO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.16 vs AMD's 12.08
- Lower P/E (39.9x vs 62.4x), PEG 1.16 vs 12.08
INTC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +494.7% vs ONTO's +124.5%
AMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 34.3%, EPS growth 165.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.6%
- 123.7% 10Y total return vs ONTO's 14.9%
- 34.3% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5%
- 13.3% margin vs SVCO's -41.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.3% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (39.9x vs 62.4x), PEG 1.16 vs 12.08 | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.3% margin vs SVCO's -41.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.55 vs ONTO's 2.60 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +494.7% vs ONTO's +124.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs SVCO's -22.6%, ROIC 4.7% vs -13.6% |
SVCO vs COHU vs ONTO vs INTC vs AMD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SVCO vs COHU vs ONTO vs INTC vs AMD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMD leads in 3 of 6 categories
ONTO leads 1 • SVCO leads 0 • COHU leads 0 • INTC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INTC is the larger business by revenue, generating $53.8B annually — 805.7x SVCO's $67M. AMD is the more profitable business, keeping 13.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SVCO's -41.7%. On growth, AMD holds the edge at +37.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $67M | $481M | $1.0B | $53.8B | $37.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$29M | -$11M | $158M | $4.0B | $6.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$28M | -$56M | $106M | -$3.2B | $5.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$44M | $32M | $239M | -$3.1B | $8.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.4% | +25.7% | +48.8% | +35.4% | +50.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -47.8% | -10.6% | +10.0% | -9.4% | +11.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -41.7% | -11.5% | +10.3% | -5.9% | +13.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -66.4% | +6.6% | +23.2% | -5.8% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.0% | +29.3% | +9.5% | +7.2% | +37.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +71.6% | +60.6% | -48.5% | -2.8% | +90.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ONTO leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 102.4x trailing earnings, ONTO trades at a 40% valuation discount to AMD's 171.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ONTO offers better value at 2.96x vs AMD's 33.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $361M | $2.3B | $14.2B | $627.1B | $742.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $355M | $2.5B | $13.8B | $659.4B | $741.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.27x | -31.16x | 102.40x | -2120.46x | 171.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 169.97x | 84.99x | 39.93x | 116.47x | 62.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.96x | — | 33.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 71.53x | 56.44x | 110.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.73x | 5.14x | 14.09x | 11.87x | 21.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.56x | 2.95x | 6.68x | 4.80x | 11.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 216.85x | 47.23x | — | 110.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMD delivers a 8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-36 for SVCO. ONTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COHU's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMD scores 8/9 vs SVCO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -35.8% | -6.8% | +5.2% | -2.7% | +8.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -22.6% | -4.9% | +4.7% | -1.6% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.6% | -5.7% | +5.7% | -0.0% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.2% | -5.9% | +6.5% | -0.0% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.46x | 0.01x | 0.37x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | $132M | -$329M | $32.3B | -$1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $227M | $346M | $14.3B | $5.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $359M | $17M | $46.6B | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -316.21x | -168.82x | — | 3.71x | 33.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMD five years ago would be worth $59,901 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,803 for SVCO. Over the past 12 months, INTC leads with a +494.7% total return vs ONTO's +124.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMD at 68.6% vs SVCO's -16.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +177.5% | +101.3% | +71.6% | +217.2% | +103.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +181.6% | +206.4% | +124.5% | +494.7% | +347.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.0% | +46.8% | +230.4% | +307.9% | +378.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.0% | +35.5% | +360.4% | +129.0% | +499.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.0% | +348.5% | +1491.2% | +350.5% | +12371.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.6% | +13.6% | +48.9% | +59.8% | +68.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SVCO and AMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SVCO is the less volatile stock with a 1.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ONTO's 2.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMD currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs SVCO's 90.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.55x | 2.12x | 2.60x | 2.27x | 2.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.76 | $50.68 | $315.86 | $130.57 | $456.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.07 | $15.97 | $85.88 | $18.97 | $101.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.0% | +97.8% | +90.1% | +95.7% | +99.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 79.6 | 66.4 | 51.2 | 80.5 | 76.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 596K | 959K | 827K | 113.6M | 36.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SVCO as "Buy", COHU as "Buy", ONTO as "Buy", INTC as "Hold", AMD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 71.9% upside for SVCO (target: $20) vs -36.3% for INTC (target: $80).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.75 | $49.75 | $331.67 | $79.55 | $401.65 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 14 | 11 | 84 | 70 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.5% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
AMD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ONTO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SVCO vs COHU vs ONTO vs INTC vs AMD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SVCO or COHU or ONTO or INTC or AMD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
(AMD) is the stronger pick with 34. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) offers the better valuation at 102. 4x trailing P/E (39. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Silvaco Group, Inc. Common Stock (SVCO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SVCO or COHU or ONTO or INTC or AMD?
On trailing P/E, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the cheapest at 102. 4x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. at 171. 8x. On forward P/E, Onto Innovation Inc. is actually cheaper at 39. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Onto Innovation Inc. wins at 1. 16x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 12. 08x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SVCO or COHU or ONTO or INTC or AMD?
Over the past 5 years, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
(AMD) delivered a total return of +499. 0%, compared to -42. 0% for Silvaco Group, Inc. Common Stock (SVCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMD returned +123. 7% versus SVCO's -42. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SVCO or COHU or ONTO or INTC or AMD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silvaco Group, Inc.
Common Stock (SVCO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 55β versus Onto Innovation Inc. 's 2. 60β — meaning ONTO is approximately 68% more volatile than SVCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 46% for Cohu, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SVCO or COHU or ONTO or INTC or AMD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
(AMD) is pulling ahead at 34. 3% versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. grew EPS 165. 0% year-over-year, compared to -31. 5% for Onto Innovation Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMD leads at 13. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SVCO or COHU or ONTO or INTC or AMD?
Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 6% net margin versus -65. 3% for Silvaco Group, Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ONTO leads at 13. 2% versus -21. 7% for SVCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SVCO leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SVCO or COHU or ONTO or INTC or AMD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 16x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 12. 08x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) trades at 39. 9x forward P/E versus 170. 0x for Silvaco Group, Inc. Common Stock — 130. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SVCO: 71. 9% to $19. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — SVCO or COHU or ONTO or INTC or AMD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SVCO or COHU or ONTO or INTC or AMD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1491% 10Y return). Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) carries a higher beta of 2. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ONTO: +1491%, AMD: +123. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SVCO and COHU and ONTO and INTC and AMD?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SVCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COHU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ONTO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; INTC is a large-cap quality compounder stock; AMD is a large-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.