Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SWK vs TTI vs NCSM vs SNA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
SWK vs TTI vs NCSM vs SNA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $12.60B | $1.32B | $106M | $19.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.23B | $630M | $180M | $5.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $371M | $7M | $19M | $1.02B |
| Gross Margin | 30.0% | 24.6% | 36.7% | 51.3% |
| Operating Margin | 7.8% | 8.4% | 5.2% | 24.7% |
| Forward P/E | 17.8x | 37.9x | 11.8x | 19.6x |
| Total Debt | $5.86B | $263M | $13M | $1.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $280M | $45M | $37M | $1.62B |
SWK vs TTI vs NCSM vs SNA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanley Black & Dec… (SWK) | 100 | 64.6 | -35.4% |
| TETRA Technologies,… (TTI) | 100 | 2963.6 | +2863.6% |
| NCS Multistage Hold… (NCSM) | 100 | 388.1 | +288.1% |
| Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) | 100 | 288.4 | +188.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SWK vs TTI vs NCSM vs SNA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SWK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.83, yield 4.1%
- 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs SNA's 2.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
TTI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +234.9% vs SNA's +20.9%
NCSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 239.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.16, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 4.27x
- 13.6% revenue growth vs SWK's -1.5%
- Lower P/E (11.8x vs 19.6x)
SNA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and defensive is your priority.
- 168.1% 10Y total return vs TTI's 96.6%
- Beta 0.76, yield 2.3%, current ratio 4.79x
- 20.0% margin vs TTI's 1.2%
- 12.2% ROA vs TTI's 1.1%, ROIC 18.1% vs 9.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.6% revenue growth vs SWK's -1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.8x vs 19.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.0% margin vs TTI's 1.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.16 vs SWK's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs SNA's 2.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +234.9% vs SNA's +20.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs TTI's 1.1%, ROIC 18.1% vs 9.5% |
SWK vs TTI vs NCSM vs SNA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SWK vs TTI vs NCSM vs SNA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SNA leads in 2 of 6 categories
NCSM leads 1 • TTI leads 1 • SWK leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SWK is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.2B annually — 84.8x NCSM's $180M. SNA is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTI's 1.2%. On growth, SWK holds the edge at +2.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.2B | $630M | $180M | $5.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.7B | $90M | $15M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $371M | $7M | $19M | $1.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $726M | $3M | $24M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.0% | +24.6% | +36.7% | +51.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +8.4% | +5.2% | +24.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +1.2% | +10.8% | +20.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +0.4% | +13.2% | +21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | -0.6% | -8.7% | -2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.0% | +100.0% | -109.3% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NCSM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.7x trailing earnings, NCSM trades at a 99% valuation discount to TTI's 440.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NCSM's 4.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TTI's 15.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.6B | $1.3B | $106M | $19.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.2B | $1.5B | $82M | $19.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.59x | 440.54x | 4.67x | 19.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.83x | 37.91x | 11.82x | 19.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.79x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.80x | 15.95x | 4.65x | 13.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.83x | 2.10x | 0.57x | 3.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.36x | 4.68x | 0.77x | 3.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.32x | 67.72x | 5.05x | 19.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SNA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SNA delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $3 for TTI. NCSM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTI's 0.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SWK scores 6/9 vs TTI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.1% | +2.5% | +14.4% | +17.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +1.1% | +11.4% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +9.5% | +7.9% | +18.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.0% | +9.7% | +8.4% | +18.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.65x | 0.93x | 0.09x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.6B | $218M | -$24M | -$298M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $280M | $45M | $37M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.9B | $263M | $13M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.07x | 2.96x | 28.21x | 27.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TTI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TTI five years ago would be worth $29,817 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,402 for SWK. Over the past 12 months, TTI leads with a +234.9% total return vs SNA's +20.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTI at 48.9% vs SWK's 2.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.1% | -0.1% | +1.8% | +7.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.4% | +234.9% | +23.4% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.9% | +230.4% | +107.6% | +53.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.0% | +198.2% | +52.5% | +60.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.7% | +96.6% | -89.9% | +168.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.6% | +48.9% | +27.6% | +15.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NCSM and SNA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NCSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SWK's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNA currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs NCSM's 46.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 1.44x | 0.16x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $93.37 | $12.54 | $87.36 | $400.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $59.54 | $2.63 | $28.64 | $301.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.8% | +78.0% | +46.2% | +93.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.0 | 61.2 | 27.7 | 46.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 1.7M | 39K | 367K |
Analyst Outlook
SWK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SWK as "Hold", TTI as "Buy", SNA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.3% upside for TTI (target: $12) vs 10.0% for SWK (target: $89). For income investors, SWK offers the higher dividend yield at 4.06% vs SNA's 2.33%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $89.17 | $12.25 | — | $413.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 31 | — | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | — | — | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 1 | — | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.29 | — | — | $8.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +1.7% |
SNA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NCSM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SWK vs TTI vs NCSM vs SNA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SWK or TTI or NCSM or SNA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the stronger pick with 13. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) offers the better valuation at 4. 7x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SWK or TTI or NCSM or SNA?
On trailing P/E, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the cheapest at 4. 7x versus TETRA Technologies, Inc. at 440. 5x. On forward P/E, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SWK or TTI or NCSM or SNA?
Over the past 5 years, TETRA Technologies, Inc.
(TTI) delivered a total return of +198. 2%, compared to -56. 0% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNA returned +168. 1% versus NCSM's -89. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SWK or TTI or NCSM or SNA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 16β versus Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning SWK is approximately 1034% more volatile than NCSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 93% for TETRA Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SWK or TTI or NCSM or SNA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is pulling ahead at 13. 6% versus -1. 5% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 239. 2% year-over-year, compared to -97. 3% for TETRA Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NCSM leads at 5. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SWK or TTI or NCSM or SNA?
Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
7% net margin versus 0. 5% for TETRA Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SNA leads at 25. 8% versus 6. 4% for NCSM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNA leads at 51. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SWK or TTI or NCSM or SNA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 37. 9x for TETRA Technologies, Inc. — 26. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTI: 25. 3% to $12. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — SWK or TTI or NCSM or SNA?
In this comparison, SWK (4.
1% yield), SNA (2. 3% yield) pay a dividend. TTI, NCSM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SWK or TTI or NCSM or SNA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
76), 2. 3% yield, +168. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNA: +168. 1%, TTI: +96. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SWK and TTI and NCSM and SNA?
These companies operate in different sectors (SWK (Industrials) and TTI (Energy) and NCSM (Energy) and SNA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SWK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; TTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NCSM is a small-cap deep-value stock; SNA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SWK, SNA pay a dividend while TTI, NCSM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.