Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SWK vs TTI vs NCSM vs SNA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.60B
5Y Perf.-35.4%
TTI
TETRA Technologies, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.32B
5Y Perf.+2863.6%
NCSM
NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$106M
5Y Perf.+288.1%
SNA
Snap-on Incorporated

Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$19.47B
5Y Perf.+188.4%

SWK vs TTI vs NCSM vs SNA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SWK logoSWK
TTI logoTTI
NCSM logoNCSM
SNA logoSNA
IndustryManufacturing - Tools & AccessoriesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesManufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Market Cap$12.60B$1.32B$106M$19.47B
Revenue (TTM)$15.23B$630M$180M$5.12B
Net Income (TTM)$371M$7M$19M$1.02B
Gross Margin30.0%24.6%36.7%51.3%
Operating Margin7.8%8.4%5.2%24.7%
Forward P/E17.8x37.9x11.8x19.6x
Total Debt$5.86B$263M$13M$1.33B
Cash & Equiv.$280M$45M$37M$1.62B

SWK vs TTI vs NCSM vs SNALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SWK
TTI
NCSM
SNA
StockMay 20May 26Return
Stanley Black & Dec… (SWK)10064.6-35.4%
TETRA Technologies,… (TTI)1002963.6+2863.6%
NCS Multistage Hold… (NCSM)100388.1+288.1%
Snap-on Incorporated (SNA)100288.4+188.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SWK vs TTI vs NCSM vs SNA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NCSM leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Snap-on Incorporated is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. SWK and TTI also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
The Income Pick

SWK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.83, yield 4.1%
  • 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs SNA's 2.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
TTI
TETRA Technologies, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

TTI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +234.9% vs SNA's +20.9%
Best for: momentum
NCSM
NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

NCSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 239.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.16, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 4.27x
  • 13.6% revenue growth vs SWK's -1.5%
  • Lower P/E (11.8x vs 19.6x)
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
SNA
Snap-on Incorporated
The Long-Run Compounder

SNA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and defensive is your priority.

  • 168.1% 10Y total return vs TTI's 96.6%
  • Beta 0.76, yield 2.3%, current ratio 4.79x
  • 20.0% margin vs TTI's 1.2%
  • 12.2% ROA vs TTI's 1.1%, ROIC 18.1% vs 9.5%
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNCSM logoNCSM13.6% revenue growth vs SWK's -1.5%
ValueNCSM logoNCSMLower P/E (11.8x vs 19.6x)
Quality / MarginsSNA logoSNA20.0% margin vs TTI's 1.2%
Stability / SafetyNCSM logoNCSMBeta 0.16 vs SWK's 1.83, lower leverage
DividendsSWK logoSWK4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs SNA's 2.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)TTI logoTTI+234.9% vs SNA's +20.9%
Efficiency (ROA)SNA logoSNA12.2% ROA vs TTI's 1.1%, ROIC 18.1% vs 9.5%

SWK vs TTI vs NCSM vs SNA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SWKStanley Black & Decker, Inc.
FY 2024
Industrial Segment
100.0%$2.1B
TTITETRA Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
55.7%$352M
Service
44.3%$279M
NCSMNCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
69.6%$128M
Service
30.4%$56M
SNASnap-on Incorporated
FY 2025
Tools Group
38.1%$2.0B
Repair Systems And Information Group
36.4%$1.9B
Commercial And Industrial Group
28.3%$1.5B
Financial Services
8.0%$413M
Product And Services, Excluding Financial Services
-10.8%$-556,300,000

SWK vs TTI vs NCSM vs SNA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSNALAGGINGNCSM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SNA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

SWK is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.2B annually — 84.8x NCSM's $180M. SNA is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTI's 1.2%. On growth, SWK holds the edge at +2.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSWK logoSWKStanley Black & D…TTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…NCSM logoNCSMNCS Multistage Ho…SNA logoSNASnap-on Incorpora…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$15.2B$630M$180M$5.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.7B$90M$15M$1.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$371M$7M$19M$1.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$726M$3M$24M$1.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+30.0%+24.6%+36.7%+51.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.8%+8.4%+5.2%+24.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.4%+1.2%+10.8%+20.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.8%+0.4%+13.2%+21.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.7%-0.6%-8.7%-2.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-35.0%+100.0%-109.3%+4.0%
SNA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NCSM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 4.7x trailing earnings, NCSM trades at a 99% valuation discount to TTI's 440.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NCSM's 4.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TTI's 15.9x.

MetricSWK logoSWKStanley Black & D…TTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…NCSM logoNCSMNCS Multistage Ho…SNA logoSNASnap-on Incorpora…
Market CapShares × price$12.6B$1.3B$106M$19.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$18.2B$1.5B$82M$19.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS30.59x440.54x4.67x19.49x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.83x37.91x11.82x19.57x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.79x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.80x15.95x4.65x13.44x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.83x2.10x0.57x3.78x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.36x4.68x0.77x3.33x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.32x67.72x5.05x19.36x
NCSM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SNA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SNA delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $3 for TTI. NCSM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTI's 0.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SWK scores 6/9 vs TTI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSWK logoSWKStanley Black & D…TTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…NCSM logoNCSMNCS Multistage Ho…SNA logoSNASnap-on Incorpora…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+4.1%+2.5%+14.4%+17.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.7%+1.1%+11.4%+12.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.8%+9.5%+7.9%+18.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.0%+9.7%+8.4%+18.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96466
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.65x0.93x0.09x0.22x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5.6B$218M-$24M-$298M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$280M$45M$37M$1.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5.9B$263M$13M$1.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.07x2.96x28.21x27.12x
SNA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TTI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TTI five years ago would be worth $29,817 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,402 for SWK. Over the past 12 months, TTI leads with a +234.9% total return vs SNA's +20.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTI at 48.9% vs SWK's 2.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSWK logoSWKStanley Black & D…TTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…NCSM logoNCSMNCS Multistage Ho…SNA logoSNASnap-on Incorpora…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+7.1%-0.1%+1.8%+7.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+36.4%+234.9%+23.4%+20.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+7.9%+230.4%+107.6%+53.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-56.0%+198.2%+52.5%+60.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-0.7%+96.6%-89.9%+168.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+2.6%+48.9%+27.6%+15.3%
TTI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NCSM and SNA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NCSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SWK's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNA currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs NCSM's 46.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSWK logoSWKStanley Black & D…TTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…NCSM logoNCSMNCS Multistage Ho…SNA logoSNASnap-on Incorpora…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.83x1.44x0.16x0.76x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$93.37$12.54$87.36$400.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$59.54$2.63$28.64$301.82
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+86.8%+78.0%+46.2%+93.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.061.227.746.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.0M1.7M39K367K
Evenly matched — NCSM and SNA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SWK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SWK as "Hold", TTI as "Buy", SNA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.3% upside for TTI (target: $12) vs 10.0% for SWK (target: $89). For income investors, SWK offers the higher dividend yield at 4.06% vs SNA's 2.33%.

MetricSWK logoSWKStanley Black & D…TTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…NCSM logoNCSMNCS Multistage Ho…SNA logoSNASnap-on Incorpora…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$89.17$12.25$413.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts373117
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.1%+2.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises16116
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.29$8.72
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%0.0%+0.3%+1.7%
SWK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SNA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NCSM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallSnap-on Incorporated (SNA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SWK vs TTI vs NCSM vs SNA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SWK or TTI or NCSM or SNA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.

(NCSM) is the stronger pick with 13. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) offers the better valuation at 4. 7x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SWK or TTI or NCSM or SNA?

On trailing P/E, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.

(NCSM) is the cheapest at 4. 7x versus TETRA Technologies, Inc. at 440. 5x. On forward P/E, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SWK or TTI or NCSM or SNA?

Over the past 5 years, TETRA Technologies, Inc.

(TTI) delivered a total return of +198. 2%, compared to -56. 0% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNA returned +168. 1% versus NCSM's -89. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SWK or TTI or NCSM or SNA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.

(NCSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 16β versus Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning SWK is approximately 1034% more volatile than NCSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 93% for TETRA Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SWK or TTI or NCSM or SNA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.

(NCSM) is pulling ahead at 13. 6% versus -1. 5% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 239. 2% year-over-year, compared to -97. 3% for TETRA Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NCSM leads at 5. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SWK or TTI or NCSM or SNA?

Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the more profitable company, earning 19.

7% net margin versus 0. 5% for TETRA Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SNA leads at 25. 8% versus 6. 4% for NCSM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNA leads at 51. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SWK or TTI or NCSM or SNA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.

(NCSM) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 37. 9x for TETRA Technologies, Inc. — 26. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTI: 25. 3% to $12. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SWK or TTI or NCSM or SNA?

In this comparison, SWK (4.

1% yield), SNA (2. 3% yield) pay a dividend. TTI, NCSM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SWK or TTI or NCSM or SNA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

76), 2. 3% yield, +168. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNA: +168. 1%, TTI: +96. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SWK and TTI and NCSM and SNA?

These companies operate in different sectors (SWK (Industrials) and TTI (Energy) and NCSM (Energy) and SNA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SWK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; TTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NCSM is a small-cap deep-value stock; SNA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SWK, SNA pay a dividend while TTI, NCSM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SWK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 18%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TTI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NCSM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SNA

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SWK and TTI and NCSM and SNA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SWK: 2.7% · TTI: -0.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SWK: 30.6x · TTI: 440.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.