Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SWK vs TTI vs SNA vs KMT vs ALLE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Security & Protection Services
SWK vs TTI vs SNA vs KMT vs ALLE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $12.47B | $1.32B | $19.30B | $3.18B | $11.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.23B | $630M | $5.12B | $2.14B | $4.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $371M | $7M | $1.02B | $137M | $634M |
| Gross Margin | 30.0% | 24.6% | 51.3% | 31.9% | 45.0% |
| Operating Margin | 7.8% | 8.4% | 24.7% | 9.5% | 20.6% |
| Forward P/E | 17.6x | 41.4x | 19.4x | 17.1x | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $5.86B | $263M | $1.33B | $643M | $2.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $280M | $45M | $1.62B | $141M | $356M |
SWK vs TTI vs SNA vs KMT vs ALLE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanley Black & Dec… (SWK) | 100 | 63.9 | -36.1% |
| TETRA Technologies,… (TTI) | 100 | 2959.1 | +2859.1% |
| Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) | 100 | 285.9 | +185.9% |
| Kennametal Inc. (KMT) | 100 | 150.3 | +50.3% |
| Allegion plc (ALLE) | 100 | 137.2 | +37.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SWK vs TTI vs SNA vs KMT vs ALLE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SWK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.
- 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs SNA's 2.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
TTI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +246.3% vs ALLE's -1.0%
SNA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.4%
- 166.1% 10Y total return vs TTI's 96.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 22.3%, current ratio 4.79x
- Beta 0.74, yield 2.4%, current ratio 4.79x
Among these 5 stocks, KMT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ALLE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 7.8%, EPS growth 9.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- PEG 0.92 vs SNA's 1.78
- 7.8% revenue growth vs KMT's -3.9%
- Lower P/E (15.6x vs 17.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.8% revenue growth vs KMT's -3.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.6x vs 17.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.0% margin vs TTI's 1.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs SWK's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs SNA's 2.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +246.3% vs ALLE's -1.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.3% ROA vs TTI's 1.1%, ROIC 18.1% vs 9.5% |
SWK vs TTI vs SNA vs KMT vs ALLE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SWK vs TTI vs SNA vs KMT vs ALLE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SNA leads in 2 of 6 categories
ALLE leads 1 • TTI leads 1 • SWK leads 1 • KMT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SWK is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.2B annually — 24.2x TTI's $630M. SNA is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTI's 1.2%. On growth, KMT holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.2B | $630M | $5.1B | $2.1B | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.7B | $90M | $1.4B | $238M | $959M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $371M | $7M | $1.0B | $137M | $634M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $726M | $3M | $1.1B | $73M | $704M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.0% | +24.6% | +51.3% | +31.9% | +45.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +8.4% | +24.7% | +9.5% | +20.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +1.2% | +20.0% | +6.4% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +0.4% | +21.0% | +3.4% | +16.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | -0.6% | -2.9% | +21.8% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.0% | +100.0% | +4.0% | +82.9% | -7.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ALLE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.4x trailing earnings, ALLE trades at a 96% valuation discount to TTI's 439.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ALLE offers better value at 1.08x vs SNA's 1.77x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.5B | $1.3B | $19.3B | $3.2B | $11.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.0B | $1.5B | $19.0B | $3.7B | $13.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.26x | 439.86x | 19.32x | 34.74x | 18.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.64x | 41.38x | 19.40x | 17.09x | 15.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.77x | — | 1.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.71x | 15.93x | 13.33x | 13.16x | 13.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.82x | 2.09x | 3.74x | 1.62x | 2.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 4.67x | 3.30x | 2.45x | 5.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.12x | 67.62x | 19.19x | 26.62x | 17.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SNA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALLE delivers a 32.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $3 for TTI. SNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALLE's 1.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SWK scores 6/9 vs TTI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.1% | +2.5% | +17.4% | +10.1% | +32.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +1.1% | +12.2% | +5.3% | +12.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +9.5% | +18.1% | +5.9% | +18.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.0% | +9.7% | +18.4% | +6.8% | +20.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.65x | 0.93x | 0.22x | 0.49x | 1.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.6B | $218M | -$298M | $503M | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $280M | $45M | $1.6B | $141M | $356M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.9B | $263M | $1.3B | $643M | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.07x | 2.96x | 27.12x | 5.29x | 8.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TTI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TTI five years ago would be worth $28,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,381 for SWK. Over the past 12 months, TTI leads with a +246.3% total return vs ALLE's -1.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTI at 48.9% vs SWK's 2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.9% | -0.3% | +6.4% | +44.5% | -14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.7% | +246.3% | +20.8% | +115.0% | -1.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.9% | +229.9% | +52.0% | +63.7% | +32.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.2% | +183.0% | +61.5% | +9.3% | +3.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.5% | +96.4% | +166.1% | +120.9% | +127.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.2% | +48.9% | +15.0% | +17.9% | +9.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KMT and ALLE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALLE is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SWK's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KMT currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs ALLE's 74.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 1.46x | 0.74x | 1.31x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $93.37 | $12.54 | $400.88 | $43.81 | $183.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $58.23 | $2.63 | $301.82 | $17.62 | $131.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.9% | +77.9% | +92.5% | +95.2% | +74.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.0 | 63.6 | 56.2 | 68.4 | 38.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 1.8M | 370K | 1.3M | 887K |
Analyst Outlook
SWK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SWK as "Hold", TTI as "Buy", SNA as "Buy", KMT as "Hold", ALLE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 26.1% upside for ALLE (target: $173) vs -13.6% for KMT (target: $36). For income investors, SWK offers the higher dividend yield at 4.10% vs ALLE's 1.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $89.17 | $12.25 | $413.00 | $36.00 | $172.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 31 | 17 | 23 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | — | +2.4% | +1.9% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 1 | 16 | 2 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.29 | — | $8.72 | $0.79 | $2.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +1.7% | +1.9% | +0.7% |
SNA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ALLE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SWK vs TTI vs SNA vs KMT vs ALLE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SWK or TTI or SNA or KMT or ALLE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the stronger pick with 7.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Kennametal Inc. (KMT). Allegion plc (ALLE) offers the better valuation at 18. 4x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SWK or TTI or SNA or KMT or ALLE?
On trailing P/E, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the cheapest at 18.
4x versus TETRA Technologies, Inc. at 439. 9x. On forward P/E, Allegion plc is actually cheaper at 15. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Allegion plc wins at 0. 92x versus Snap-on Incorporated's 1. 78x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SWK or TTI or SNA or KMT or ALLE?
Over the past 5 years, TETRA Technologies, Inc.
(TTI) delivered a total return of +183. 0%, compared to -56. 2% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNA returned +166. 1% versus SWK's -1. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SWK or TTI or SNA or KMT or ALLE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Allegion plc (ALLE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning SWK is approximately 175% more volatile than ALLE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 110% for Allegion plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SWK or TTI or SNA or KMT or ALLE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Allegion plc (ALLE) is pulling ahead at 7.
8% versus -3. 9% for Kennametal Inc. (KMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. grew EPS 35. 9% year-over-year, compared to -97. 3% for TETRA Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALLE leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SWK or TTI or SNA or KMT or ALLE?
Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
7% net margin versus 0. 5% for TETRA Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SNA leads at 25. 8% versus 7. 3% for KMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNA leads at 51. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SWK or TTI or SNA or KMT or ALLE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus Snap-on Incorporated's 1. 78x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Allegion plc (ALLE) trades at 15. 6x forward P/E versus 41. 4x for TETRA Technologies, Inc. — 25. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALLE: 26. 1% to $172. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SWK or TTI or SNA or KMT or ALLE?
In this comparison, SWK (4.
1% yield), SNA (2. 4% yield), KMT (1. 9% yield), ALLE (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. TTI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SWK or TTI or SNA or KMT or ALLE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 1. 5% yield, +127. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALLE: +127. 3%, TTI: +96. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SWK and TTI and SNA and KMT and ALLE?
These companies operate in different sectors (SWK (Industrials) and TTI (Energy) and SNA (Industrials) and KMT (Industrials) and ALLE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SWK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; TTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SNA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KMT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALLE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SWK, SNA, KMT, ALLE pay a dividend while TTI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.