Coal
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SXC vs FANG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
SXC vs FANG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Coal | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $615M | $54.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.86B | $15.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-66M | $403M |
| Gross Margin | 6.5% | 41.8% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 22.1% |
| Forward P/E | 19.9x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $686M | $14.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $89M | $106M |
SXC vs FANG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) | 100 | 212.6 | +112.6% |
| Diamondback Energy,… (FANG) | 100 | 458.2 | +358.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SXC vs FANG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SXC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.91, yield 6.7%
- Beta 0.91, yield 6.7%, current ratio 2.11x
- 6.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FANG's 2.0%
FANG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 36.3%, EPS growth -63.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.2%
- 168.8% 10Y total return vs SXC's 37.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.09, Low D/E 33.7%, current ratio 0.42x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.3% revenue growth vs SXC's -5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 19.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.7% margin vs SXC's -3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.09 vs SXC's 0.91, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FANG's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.9% vs SXC's -13.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.6% ROA vs SXC's -3.7%, ROIC 6.7% vs 4.3% |
SXC vs FANG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SXC vs FANG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FANG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.2B annually — 8.2x SXC's $1.9B. FANG is the more profitable business, keeping 2.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SXC's -3.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $15.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $208M | $8.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$66M | $403M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $77M | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | +41.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +22.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +2.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +10.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.4% | +5.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -125.7% | -98.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SXC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SXC's 5.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FANG's 7.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $615M | $54.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $69.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.94x | 34.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.86x | 10.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.51x | 6.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.33x | 3.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.99x | 1.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.54x | 10.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FANG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FANG delivers a 0.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-10 for SXC. FANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SXC's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FANG scores 4/9 vs SXC's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.9% | +0.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.7% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.3% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | +7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.09x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $597M | $14.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $89M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $686M | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.18x | 0.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FANG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FANG five years ago would be worth $27,567 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,831 for SXC. Over the past 12 months, FANG leads with a +50.9% total return vs SXC's -13.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FANG at 17.2% vs SXC's 3.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.5% | +28.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.1% | +50.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.0% | +61.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.3% | +175.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.4% | +168.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.2% | +17.2% |
Risk & Volatility
FANG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FANG is the less volatile stock with a 0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SXC's 0.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FANG currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs SXC's 79.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.91x | 0.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.07 | $214.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.52 | $127.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.9% | +91.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.4 | 62.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
SXC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SXC as "Buy" and FANG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.1% upside for SXC (target: $9) vs 3.2% for FANG (target: $201). For income investors, SXC offers the higher dividend yield at 6.68% vs FANG's 2.05%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $201.27 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.7% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.48 | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.7% |
FANG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SXC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
SXC vs FANG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SXC or FANG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) is the stronger pick with 36. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC). Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) offers the better valuation at 34. 0x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SXC or FANG?
On forward P/E, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 10. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SXC or FANG?
Over the past 5 years, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) delivered a total return of +175. 7%, compared to +18. 3% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FANG returned +168. 8% versus SXC's +37. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SXC or FANG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 09β versus SunCoke Energy, Inc. 's 0. 91β — meaning SXC is approximately 902% more volatile than FANG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 109% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SXC or FANG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) is pulling ahead at 36. 3% versus -5. 1% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Diamondback Energy, Inc. grew EPS -63. 1% year-over-year, compared to -146. 4% for SunCoke Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FANG leads at 16. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SXC or FANG?
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 1% net margin versus -2. 4% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FANG leads at 32. 7% versus 3. 5% for SXC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FANG leads at 35. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SXC or FANG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 19. 9x for SunCoke Energy, Inc. — 8. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SXC: 24. 1% to $9. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SXC or FANG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) offers the highest yield at 6. 7%, versus 2. 0% for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).
09Is SXC or FANG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 09), 2. 0% yield, +168. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FANG: +168. 8%, SXC: +37. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SXC and FANG?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SXC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FANG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.