Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SXC vs FANG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SXC
SunCoke Energy, Inc.

Coal

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$615M
5Y Perf.+112.6%
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$54.88B
5Y Perf.+358.2%

SXC vs FANG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SXC logoSXC
FANG logoFANG
IndustryCoalOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$615M$54.88B
Revenue (TTM)$1.86B$15.19B
Net Income (TTM)$-66M$403M
Gross Margin6.5%41.8%
Operating Margin2.1%22.1%
Forward P/E19.9x10.9x
Total Debt$686M$14.49B
Cash & Equiv.$89M$106M

SXC vs FANGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SXC
FANG
StockMay 20May 26Return
SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC)100212.6+112.6%
Diamondback Energy,… (FANG)100458.2+358.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SXC vs FANG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FANG leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. SunCoke Energy, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SXC
SunCoke Energy, Inc.
The Income Pick

SXC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.91, yield 6.7%
  • Beta 0.91, yield 6.7%, current ratio 2.11x
  • 6.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FANG's 2.0%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
The Growth Play

FANG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 36.3%, EPS growth -63.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.2%
  • 168.8% 10Y total return vs SXC's 37.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.09, Low D/E 33.7%, current ratio 0.42x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFANG logoFANG36.3% revenue growth vs SXC's -5.1%
ValueFANG logoFANGLower P/E (10.9x vs 19.9x)
Quality / MarginsFANG logoFANG2.7% margin vs SXC's -3.5%
Stability / SafetyFANG logoFANGBeta 0.09 vs SXC's 0.91, lower leverage
DividendsSXC logoSXC6.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FANG's 2.0%
Momentum (1Y)FANG logoFANG+50.9% vs SXC's -13.1%
Efficiency (ROA)FANG logoFANG0.6% ROA vs SXC's -3.7%, ROIC 6.7% vs 4.3%

SXC vs FANG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SXCSunCoke Energy, Inc.
FY 2025
Coke Sales
84.9%$1.6B
Industrial Services
10.1%$186M
Steam And Electricity Sales
2.7%$50M
Operating And Licensing Fees
1.9%$36M
Other Products And Services
0.4%$7M
FANGDiamondback Energy, Inc.
FY 2025
Oil Exploration and Production
88.3%$25.1B
Oil Purchased
5.2%$1.5B
Natural Gas Liquids Production
5.0%$1.4B
Natural Gas, Production
1.4%$400M

SXC vs FANG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFANGLAGGINGSXC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FANG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

FANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.2B annually — 8.2x SXC's $1.9B. FANG is the more profitable business, keeping 2.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SXC's -3.5%.

MetricSXC logoSXCSunCoke Energy, I…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.9B$15.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$208M$8.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$66M$403M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$77M$1.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+6.5%+41.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+2.1%+22.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.5%+2.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.2%+10.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.4%+5.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-125.7%-98.3%
FANG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SXC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, SXC's 5.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FANG's 7.0x.

MetricSXC logoSXCSunCoke Energy, I…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…
Market CapShares × price$615M$54.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.2B$69.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-13.94x34.05x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.86x10.94x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.51x6.96x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.33x3.65x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.99x1.31x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.54x10.48x
SXC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FANG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

FANG delivers a 0.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-10 for SXC. FANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SXC's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FANG scores 4/9 vs SXC's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricSXC logoSXCSunCoke Energy, I…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-9.9%+0.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-3.7%+0.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.3%+6.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.3%+7.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–924
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.09x0.34x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$597M$14.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$89M$106M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$686M$14.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.18x0.66x
FANG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FANG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FANG five years ago would be worth $27,567 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,831 for SXC. Over the past 12 months, FANG leads with a +50.9% total return vs SXC's -13.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FANG at 17.2% vs SXC's 3.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSXC logoSXCSunCoke Energy, I…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+0.5%+28.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-13.1%+50.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+10.0%+61.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+18.3%+175.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+37.4%+168.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+3.2%+17.2%
FANG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FANG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FANG is the less volatile stock with a 0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SXC's 0.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FANG currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs SXC's 79.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSXC logoSXCSunCoke Energy, I…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.91x0.09x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.07$214.51
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.52$127.75
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+79.9%+91.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10066.462.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.8M3.4M
FANG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SXC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates SXC as "Buy" and FANG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.1% upside for SXC (target: $9) vs 3.2% for FANG (target: $201). For income investors, SXC offers the higher dividend yield at 6.68% vs FANG's 2.05%.

MetricSXC logoSXCSunCoke Energy, I…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$9.00$201.27
# AnalystsCovering analysts1751
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+6.7%+2.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises60
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.48$4.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.7%
SXC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FANG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SXC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallDiamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SXC vs FANG: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SXC or FANG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) is the stronger pick with 36. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC). Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) offers the better valuation at 34. 0x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SXC or FANG?

On forward P/E, Diamondback Energy, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 10. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SXC or FANG?

Over the past 5 years, Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) delivered a total return of +175. 7%, compared to +18. 3% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FANG returned +168. 8% versus SXC's +37. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SXC or FANG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 09β versus SunCoke Energy, Inc. 's 0. 91β — meaning SXC is approximately 902% more volatile than FANG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 109% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SXC or FANG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) is pulling ahead at 36. 3% versus -5. 1% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Diamondback Energy, Inc. grew EPS -63. 1% year-over-year, compared to -146. 4% for SunCoke Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FANG leads at 16. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SXC or FANG?

Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 1% net margin versus -2. 4% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FANG leads at 32. 7% versus 3. 5% for SXC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FANG leads at 35. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SXC or FANG more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 19. 9x for SunCoke Energy, Inc. — 8. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SXC: 24. 1% to $9. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SXC or FANG?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) offers the highest yield at 6. 7%, versus 2. 0% for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).

09

Is SXC or FANG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 09), 2. 0% yield, +168. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FANG: +168. 8%, SXC: +37. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SXC and FANG?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SXC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FANG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

SXC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 2.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FANG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SXC and FANG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SXC: 4.4% · FANG: 5.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.