Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SXI vs CW vs RBC vs HEI vs NN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Aerospace & Defense
Internet Content & Information
SXI vs CW vs RBC vs HEI vs NN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Aerospace & Defense | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Aerospace & Defense | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $3.25B | $26.70B | $20.01B | $24.38B | $2.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $869M | $3.61B | $1.79B | $4.63B | $5M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $54M | $511M | $269M | $713M | $-189M |
| Gross Margin | 40.0% | 37.2% | 44.3% | 30.4% | -256.2% |
| Operating Margin | 15.1% | 18.5% | 23.8% | 22.8% | -15.4% |
| Forward P/E | 30.8x | 48.0x | 50.3x | 51.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $604M | $1.31B | $1.03B | $2.19B | $15M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $105M | $371M | $37M | $218M | $45M |
SXI vs CW vs RBC vs HEI vs NN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standex Internation… (SXI) | 100 | 355.7 | +255.7% |
| Curtiss-Wright Corp… (CW) | 100 | 627.6 | +527.6% |
| RBC Bearings Incorp… (RBC) | 100 | 513.9 | +413.9% |
| HEICO Corporation (HEI) | 100 | 234.3 | +134.3% |
| NextNav Inc. (NN) | 100 | 197.1 | +97.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SXI vs CW vs RBC vs HEI vs NN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SXI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.40, yield 0.5%
- Better valuation composite
- 0.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs CW's 0.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
CW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 2.20 vs RBC's 5.74
- +100.0% vs HEI's +8.1%
- 9.8% ROA vs NN's -73.1%
RBC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 8.7% 10Y total return vs CW's 8.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 33.9%, current ratio 3.26x
- Beta 1.05, yield 0.1%, current ratio 3.26x
HEI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 16.3%, EPS growth 33.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.6%
- 16.3% revenue growth vs NN's -19.3%
- 15.4% margin vs NN's -41.4%
- Beta 1.04 vs SXI's 1.40, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, NN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.3% revenue growth vs NN's -19.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.4% margin vs NN's -41.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs SXI's 1.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs CW's 0.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.0% vs HEI's +8.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.8% ROA vs NN's -73.1% |
SXI vs CW vs RBC vs HEI vs NN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SXI vs CW vs RBC vs HEI vs NN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SXI leads in 2 of 6 categories
RBC leads 1 • CW leads 1 • HEI leads 0 • NN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RBC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HEI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.6B annually — 1013.2x NN's $5M. HEI is the more profitable business, keeping 15.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NN's -41.4%. On growth, RBC holds the edge at +17.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $869M | $3.6B | $1.8B | $4.6B | $5M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $161M | $729M | $548M | $1.2B | -$62M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $54M | $511M | $269M | $713M | -$189M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $52M | $591M | $330M | $841M | -$51M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.0% | +37.2% | +44.3% | +30.4% | -2.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.1% | +18.5% | +23.8% | +22.8% | -15.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +14.2% | +15.0% | +15.4% | -41.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +16.4% | +18.4% | +18.1% | -11.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.6% | +13.4% | +17.0% | +14.4% | -50.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +152.5% | +29.1% | +17.0% | +12.5% | -85.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SXI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 56.2x trailing earnings, CW trades at a 29% valuation discount to RBC's 79.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CW offers better value at 2.58x vs RBC's 9.07x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $26.7B | $20.0B | $24.4B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.8B | $27.6B | $21.0B | $26.4B | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 57.84x | 56.20x | 79.45x | 59.09x | -13.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.78x | 48.02x | 50.32x | 51.57x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 8.28x | 2.58x | 9.07x | 3.60x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.85x | 43.32x | 42.86x | 21.69x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.12x | 7.63x | 12.23x | 5.44x | 577.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.36x | 10.74x | 6.13x | 9.31x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 78.84x | 48.21x | 82.06x | 28.30x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CW leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CW delivers a 19.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $7 for SXI. RBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SXI's 0.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CW scores 7/9 vs NN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | +19.6% | +8.2% | +12.9% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.5% | +9.8% | +5.2% | +7.9% | -73.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.7% | +14.1% | +6.9% | +12.6% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.7% | +16.6% | +8.5% | +14.0% | -36.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | 0.52x | 0.34x | 0.50x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $499M | $943M | $992M | $2.0B | -$30M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $105M | $371M | $37M | $218M | $45M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $604M | $1.3B | $1.0B | $2.2B | $15M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.68x | 15.90x | 7.78x | 8.32x | -5.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CW and RBC and NN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CW five years ago would be worth $54,902 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,608 for NN. Over the past 12 months, CW leads with a +100.0% total return vs HEI's +8.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NN at 109.2% vs HEI's 19.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.5% | +26.4% | +33.3% | -12.0% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +76.8% | +100.0% | +78.8% | +8.1% | +41.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.5% | +347.1% | +173.5% | +71.7% | +816.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +170.3% | +449.0% | +307.0% | +105.2% | +96.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +247.8% | +815.8% | +867.2% | +823.0% | +100.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.9% | +64.7% | +39.9% | +19.7% | +109.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RBC and HEI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HEI is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SXI's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RBC currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs HEI's 80.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 1.23x | 1.05x | 1.04x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $283.54 | $750.00 | $632.00 | $361.69 | $24.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $144.62 | $359.48 | $339.53 | $256.11 | $10.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.7% | +96.4% | +96.8% | +80.1% | +80.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.7 | 59.8 | 66.1 | 60.7 | 55.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 195K | 303K | 176K | 698K | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
SXI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SXI as "Buy", CW as "Buy", RBC as "Buy", HEI as "Buy", NN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.0% upside for NN (target: $26) vs -6.4% for RBC (target: $573). For income investors, SXI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.47% vs CW's 0.13%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $304.50 | $708.50 | $572.60 | $371.00 | $26.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 25 | 26 | 34 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +0.1% | +0.1% | +0.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 10 | 0 | 10 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.25 | $0.92 | $0.57 | $0.23 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +1.7% | +0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
SXI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). RBC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
SXI vs CW vs RBC vs HEI vs NN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SXI or CW or RBC or HEI or NN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HEICO Corporation (HEI) is the stronger pick with 16.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) offers the better valuation at 56. 2x trailing P/E (48. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Standex International Corporation (SXI) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SXI or CW or RBC or HEI or NN?
On trailing P/E, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is the cheapest at 56.
2x versus RBC Bearings Incorporated at 79. 5x. On forward P/E, Standex International Corporation is actually cheaper at 30. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Curtiss-Wright Corporation wins at 2. 20x versus RBC Bearings Incorporated's 5. 74x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SXI or CW or RBC or HEI or NN?
Over the past 5 years, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) delivered a total return of +449.
0%, compared to +96. 1% for NextNav Inc. (NN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RBC returned +867. 2% versus NN's +100. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SXI or CW or RBC or HEI or NN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), HEICO Corporation (HEI) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
04β versus Standex International Corporation's 1. 40β — meaning SXI is approximately 35% more volatile than HEI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 82% for Standex International Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SXI or CW or RBC or HEI or NN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HEICO Corporation (HEI) is pulling ahead at 16.
3% versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HEICO Corporation grew EPS 33. 5% year-over-year, compared to -69. 0% for NextNav Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HEI leads at 26. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SXI or CW or RBC or HEI or NN?
HEICO Corporation (HEI) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
4% net margin versus -41. 4% for NextNav Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HEI leads at 22. 7% versus -1535. 8% for NN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RBC leads at 44. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SXI or CW or RBC or HEI or NN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 20x versus RBC Bearings Incorporated's 5. 74x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Standex International Corporation (SXI) trades at 30. 8x forward P/E versus 51. 6x for HEICO Corporation — 20. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NN: 35. 0% to $26. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — SXI or CW or RBC or HEI or NN?
In this comparison, SXI (0.
5% yield), CW (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. RBC, HEI, NN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SXI or CW or RBC or HEI or NN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
05), +867. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RBC: +867. 2%, NN: +100. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SXI and CW and RBC and HEI and NN?
These companies operate in different sectors (SXI (Industrials) and CW (Industrials) and RBC (Industrials) and HEI (Industrials) and NN (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SXI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RBC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HEI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.