Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SXTP vs AEYE vs MTNB vs GERN vs NUVB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
SXTP vs AEYE vs MTNB vs GERN vs NUVB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Software - Application | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $896K | $100M | $4M | $936M | $1.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $964K | $40M | $0.00 | $196M | $143M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $-3M | $-17M | $-70M | $-146M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 78.3% | — | 61.0% | 91.6% |
| Operating Margin | -8.2% | -7.9% | — | -18.9% | -105.0% |
| Total Debt | $156K | $721K | $3M | $252M | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $5M | $7M | $79M | $164M |
SXTP vs AEYE vs MTNB vs GERN vs NUVB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60 Degrees Pharmace… (SXTP) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 149.8 | +49.8% |
| Matinas BioPharma H… (MTNB) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
| Geron Corporation (GERN) | 100 | 45.1 | -54.9% |
| Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) | 100 | 260.5 | +160.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SXTP vs AEYE vs MTNB vs GERN vs NUVB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SXTP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
AEYE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and efficiency.
- -7.6% margin vs SXTP's -8.3%
- -9.5% ROA vs MTNB's -180.3%, ROIC -42.4% vs -173.9%
MTNB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.12
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 38.1%, current ratio 3.01x
- Beta 0.12 vs AEYE's 2.29
GERN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- -47.3% 10Y total return vs AEYE's 102.2%
- Beta 1.89, current ratio 4.66x
NUVB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 7.0%, EPS growth 71.6%
- 7.0% revenue growth vs MTNB's -100.0%
- +136.3% vs SXTP's -31.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.0% revenue growth vs MTNB's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -7.6% margin vs SXTP's -8.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs AEYE's 2.29 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +136.3% vs SXTP's -31.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -9.5% ROA vs MTNB's -180.3%, ROIC -42.4% vs -173.9% |
SXTP vs AEYE vs MTNB vs GERN vs NUVB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SXTP vs AEYE vs MTNB vs GERN vs NUVB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SXTP leads in 1 of 6 categories
GERN leads 1 • NUVB leads 1 • AEYE leads 1 • MTNB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AEYE and NUVB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GERN and MTNB operate at a comparable scale, with $196M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -7.6% (AEYE) to -8.3% (SXTP). On growth, NUVB holds the edge at +26.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $963,526 | $40M | $0 | $196M | $143M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$504,000 | -$14M | -$36M | -$145M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | -$3M | -$17M | -$70M | -$146M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $2M | -$9M | -$126M | -$126M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.1% | +78.3% | — | +61.0% | +91.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | -7.9% | — | -18.9% | -105.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.3% | -7.6% | — | -35.5% | -102.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.1% | +5.5% | — | -64.4% | -88.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.2% | +7.9% | — | +30.9% | +26.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.0% | +29.0% | +52.9% | +66.7% | +106.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SXTP leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $895,715 | $100M | $4M | $936M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$607,747 | $96M | -$535,407 | $1.1B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.09x | -32.36x | -0.13x | -11.23x | -8.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.47x | 2.49x | — | 5.09x | 26.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.18x | 20.91x | 0.42x | 4.31x | 5.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GERN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GERN delivers a -28.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-29 in annual profit, vs $-3 for MTNB. NUVB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GERN's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SXTP scores 5/9 vs MTNB's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -183.5% | -47.8% | -2.7% | -28.9% | -44.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -119.2% | -9.5% | -180.3% | -12.5% | -23.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.8% | -42.4% | -173.9% | -11.2% | -54.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.1% | -17.7% | -151.5% | -11.2% | -42.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.15x | 0.38x | 1.11x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$5M | -$4M | $172M | -$154M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $5M | $7M | $79M | $164M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $155,891 | $721,000 | $3M | $252M | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1297.95x | -2.79x | — | -2.40x | -162.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NUVB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GERN five years ago would be worth $10,977 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $56 for SXTP. Over the past 12 months, NUVB leads with a +136.3% total return vs SXTP's -31.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NUVB at 43.8% vs SXTP's -82.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +206.2% | -18.7% | +5.4% | +10.6% | -43.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.3% | -27.9% | -7.7% | +11.5% | +136.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | +20.6% | -98.0% | -46.9% | +197.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -60.2% | -98.3% | +9.8% | -58.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | +102.2% | -97.5% | -47.3% | -51.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -82.2% | +6.4% | -72.8% | -19.0% | +43.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MTNB and GERN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MTNB is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEYE's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GERN currently trades 72.6% from its 52-week high vs SXTP's 18.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.96x | 2.29x | 0.12x | 1.89x | 2.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.62 | $16.39 | $3.09 | $2.01 | $9.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.34 | $5.31 | $0.48 | $1.04 | $1.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.3% | +49.4% | +21.1% | +72.6% | +49.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.3 | 61.3 | 66.6 | 48.0 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 194K | 27K | 17.2M | 4.3M |
Analyst Outlook
AEYE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GERN as "Buy", NUVB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 303.4% upside for GERN (target: $6) vs 157.3% for NUVB (target: $12).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $5.89 | $12.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 22 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SXTP leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). GERN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
SXTP vs AEYE vs MTNB vs GERN vs NUVB: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SXTP or AEYE or MTNB or GERN or NUVB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is the stronger pick with 699. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Matinas BioPharma Holdings, Inc. (MTNB). Analysts rate Geron Corporation (GERN) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SXTP or AEYE or MTNB or GERN or NUVB?
Over the past 5 years, Geron Corporation (GERN) delivered a total return of +9.
8%, compared to -99. 4% for 60 Degrees Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SXTP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEYE returned +102. 2% versus SXTP's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SXTP or AEYE or MTNB or GERN or NUVB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Matinas BioPharma Holdings, Inc.
(MTNB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus AudioEye, Inc. 's 2. 29β — meaning AEYE is approximately 1782% more volatile than MTNB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 111% for Geron Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SXTP or AEYE or MTNB or GERN or NUVB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is pulling ahead at 699. 0% versus -100. 0% for Matinas BioPharma Holdings, Inc. (MTNB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nuvation Bio Inc. grew EPS 71. 6% year-over-year, compared to -1852. 6% for 60 Degrees Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GERN leads at 575. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SXTP or AEYE or MTNB or GERN or NUVB?
Matinas BioPharma Holdings, Inc.
(MTNB) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -1308. 0% for 60 Degrees Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTNB leads at 0. 0% versus -1599. 0% for SXTP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GERN leads at 97. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SXTP or AEYE or MTNB or GERN or NUVB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SXTP or AEYE or MTNB or GERN or NUVB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Matinas BioPharma Holdings, Inc.
(MTNB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12)). Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTNB: -97. 5%, NUVB: -51. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SXTP and AEYE and MTNB and GERN and NUVB?
These companies operate in different sectors (SXTP (Healthcare) and AEYE (Technology) and MTNB (Healthcare) and GERN (Healthcare) and NUVB (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SXTP is a small-cap high-growth stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MTNB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GERN is a small-cap high-growth stock; NUVB is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.