Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SYM vs GTLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
SYM vs GTLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $6.79B | $9.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.52B | $4.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $40M |
| Gross Margin | 19.9% | 32.6% |
| Operating Margin | -0.9% | 8.5% |
| Forward P/E | 120.0x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $3.74B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.24B | $366M |
SYM vs GTLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Symbotic Inc. (SYM) | 100 | 605.5 | +505.5% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 146.0 | +46.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SYM vs GTLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SYM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 25.7%, EPS growth -100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 55.9%
- 25.7% revenue growth vs GTLS's 2.5%
- +166.5% vs GTLS's +37.4%
GTLS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 0.3%
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs SYM's 496.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 1.36x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.7% revenue growth vs GTLS's 2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 120.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.9% margin vs SYM's 0.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs SYM's 3.12 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SYM's 0.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +166.5% vs GTLS's +37.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.4% ROA vs SYM's 0.4% |
SYM vs GTLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SYM vs GTLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SYM and GTLS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 1.7x SYM's $2.5B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.9% (GTLS) to 0.4% (SYM). On growth, SYM holds the edge at +23.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $644M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | $40M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $749M | $203M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +32.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +8.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +0.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.1% | -2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +127.5% | -36.1% |
Valuation Metrics
GTLS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.8B | $9.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.5B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -382.25x | 629.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 119.99x | 16.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.02x | 2.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 13.75x | 2.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.62x | 49.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SYM and GTLS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYM delivers a 1.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $1 for GTLS. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GTLS scores 5/9 vs SYM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.5% | +1.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +7.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -18.7% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.2B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $366M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $3.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SYM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SYM five years ago would be worth $59,726 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,325 for GTLS. Over the past 12 months, SYM leads with a +166.5% total return vs GTLS's +37.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SYM at 29.6% vs GTLS's 17.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.7% | +0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +166.5% | +37.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +117.7% | +63.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +497.3% | +33.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +496.7% | +740.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.6% | +17.7% |
Risk & Volatility
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SYM's 3.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs SYM's 69.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.12x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $87.88 | $208.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.89 | $140.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.6% | +99.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.4 | 50.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
GTLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SYM as "Buy" and GTLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.0% upside for SYM (target: $67) vs -6.7% for GTLS (target: $194). GTLS is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $67.30 | $193.81 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.01 | $0.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GTLS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). SYM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SYM vs GTLS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SYM or GTLS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Symbotic Inc.
(SYM) is the stronger pick with 25. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) offers the better valuation at 629. 6x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Symbotic Inc. (SYM) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SYM or GTLS?
On forward P/E, Chart Industries, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 16. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SYM or GTLS?
Over the past 5 years, Symbotic Inc.
(SYM) delivered a total return of +497. 3%, compared to +33. 2% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +740. 5% versus SYM's +496. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SYM or GTLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Symbotic Inc. 's 3. 12β — meaning SYM is approximately 460% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — SYM or GTLS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Symbotic Inc.
(SYM) is pulling ahead at 25. 7% versus 2. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chart Industries, Inc. grew EPS -92. 0% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Symbotic Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SYM leads at 55. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SYM or GTLS?
Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 0% net margin versus -0. 8% for Symbotic Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTLS leads at 15. 2% versus -5. 1% for SYM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTLS leads at 29. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SYM or GTLS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 120. 0x for Symbotic Inc. — 103. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SYM: 10. 0% to $67. 30.
08Which pays a better dividend — SYM or GTLS?
In this comparison, GTLS (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. SYM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SYM or GTLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +740. 5% 10Y return). Symbotic Inc. (SYM) carries a higher beta of 3. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +740. 5%, SYM: +496. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SYM and GTLS?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SYM is a small-cap high-growth stock; GTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.