Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SYNA vs MCHP vs SWKS vs MPWR vs SLAB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
SYNA vs MCHP vs SWKS vs MPWR vs SLAB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $4.13B | $54.97B | $9.78B | $77.41B | $7.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.17B | $4.37B | $4.04B | $2.79B | $785M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-48M | $-97M | $361M | $616M | $-65M |
| Gross Margin | 43.6% | 51.6% | 41.1% | 55.2% | 58.2% |
| Operating Margin | -6.4% | 4.1% | 9.4% | 26.1% | -9.0% |
| Forward P/E | 23.9x | 64.8x | 13.8x | 73.1x | 80.4x |
| Total Debt | $880M | $5.67B | $1.20B | $24M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $392M | $772M | $1.16B | $1.10B | $364M |
SYNA vs MCHP vs SWKS vs MPWR vs SLAB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Synaptics Incorpora… (SYNA) | 100 | 166.0 | +66.0% |
| Microchip Technolog… (MCHP) | 100 | 211.6 | +111.6% |
| Skyworks Solutions,… (SWKS) | 100 | 54.9 | -45.1% |
| Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR) | 100 | 751.4 | +651.4% |
| Silicon Laboratorie… (SLAB) | 100 | 232.4 | +132.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SYNA vs MCHP vs SWKS vs MPWR vs SLAB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SYNA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, MCHP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SWKS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.36, yield 4.3%
- Beta 1.36, yield 4.3%, current ratio 2.33x
- Lower P/E (13.8x vs 80.4x)
- 4.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
MPWR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 24.9% 10Y total return vs SLAB's 375.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.28, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 5.91x
- 22.1% margin vs SLAB's -8.3%
- +148.6% vs SWKS's +1.5%
SLAB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 34.3%, EPS growth 66.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.5%
- 34.3% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3%
- Beta 1.25 vs SYNA's 2.28
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.3% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.8x vs 80.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.1% margin vs SLAB's -8.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.25 vs SYNA's 2.28 | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +148.6% vs SWKS's +1.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs SLAB's -5.1%, ROIC 22.2% vs -6.9% |
SYNA vs MCHP vs SWKS vs MPWR vs SLAB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SYNA vs MCHP vs SWKS vs MPWR vs SLAB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MPWR leads in 3 of 6 categories
SWKS leads 2 • SLAB leads 1 • SYNA leads 0 • MCHP leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPWR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCHP is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 5.6x SLAB's $785M. MPWR is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLAB's -8.3%. On growth, SLAB holds the edge at +25.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $4.4B | $4.0B | $2.8B | $785M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | $881M | $842M | $781M | -$32M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$48M | -$97M | $361M | $616M | -$65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $97M | $820M | $697M | $664M | $66M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.6% | +51.6% | +41.1% | +55.2% | +58.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.4% | +4.1% | +9.4% | +26.1% | -9.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | -2.2% | +8.9% | +22.1% | -8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +18.8% | +17.2% | +23.8% | +8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.4% | +15.6% | -1.0% | +20.8% | +25.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.5% | +164.2% | -44.2% | -88.4% | +88.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SWKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.1x trailing earnings, SWKS trades at a 83% valuation discount to MPWR's 123.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SWKS's 10.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MPWR's 97.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.1B | $55.0B | $9.8B | $77.4B | $7.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.6B | $59.9B | $9.8B | $76.3B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -86.72x | -9999.00x | 21.12x | 123.60x | -109.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.88x | 64.79x | 13.79x | 73.12x | 80.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.19x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 94.16x | 57.21x | 10.20x | 97.90x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.84x | 12.49x | 2.39x | 27.74x | 9.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.98x | 7.71x | 1.75x | 21.56x | 6.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.84x | 71.19x | 8.85x | 116.20x | 109.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-6 for SLAB. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MCHP's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MPWR scores 6/9 vs SLAB's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.5% | -1.4% | +6.3% | +17.9% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.9% | -0.7% | +4.6% | +15.2% | -5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.0% | +1.8% | +6.3% | +22.2% | -6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.9% | +2.1% | +7.0% | +20.4% | -6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.63x | 0.80x | 0.21x | 0.01x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $489M | $4.9B | $42M | -$1.1B | -$364M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $392M | $772M | $1.2B | $1.1B | $364M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $880M | $5.7B | $1.2B | $24M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -30.00x | 0.78x | 14.46x | — | -58.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MPWR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MPWR five years ago would be worth $46,617 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,449 for SWKS. Over the past 12 months, MPWR leads with a +148.6% total return vs SWKS's +1.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPWR at 56.1% vs SWKS's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.7% | +56.9% | +2.1% | +68.5% | +65.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +81.7% | +115.1% | +1.5% | +148.6% | +100.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.7% | +43.9% | -30.3% | +280.3% | +59.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.1% | +45.7% | -55.5% | +366.2% | +61.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.9% | +373.8% | +31.2% | +2494.7% | +375.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.2% | +12.9% | -11.4% | +56.1% | +16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
SLAB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLAB is the less volatile stock with a 1.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SYNA's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLAB currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs SWKS's 71.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.28x | 1.70x | 1.36x | 2.28x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $110.43 | $103.17 | $90.90 | $1662.00 | $218.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.80 | $46.92 | $51.92 | $613.00 | $106.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.8% | +98.5% | +71.6% | +94.8% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.5 | 82.5 | 55.9 | 71.0 | 66.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 739K | 9.0M | 3.3M | 577K | 465K |
Analyst Outlook
SWKS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SYNA as "Buy", MCHP as "Buy", SWKS as "Buy", MPWR as "Buy", SLAB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.5% upside for MPWR (target: $1615) vs -14.4% for MCHP (target: $87). For income investors, SWKS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.29% vs MPWR's 0.37%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $96.86 | $87.00 | $62.75 | $1615.00 | $211.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 32 | 46 | 59 | 25 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% | +4.3% | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 | 12 | 8 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.82 | $2.79 | $5.90 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | +0.2% | +0.5% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
MPWR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SWKS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
SYNA vs MCHP vs SWKS vs MPWR vs SLAB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SYNA or MCHP or SWKS or MPWR or SLAB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the stronger pick with 34. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) offers the better valuation at 21. 1x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SYNA or MCHP or SWKS or MPWR or SLAB?
On trailing P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the cheapest at 21. 1x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. at 123. 6x. On forward P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SYNA or MCHP or SWKS or MPWR or SLAB?
Over the past 5 years, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) delivered a total return of +366. 2%, compared to -55. 5% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPWR returned +24. 9% versus SWKS's +31. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SYNA or MCHP or SWKS or MPWR or SLAB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 25β versus Synaptics Incorporated's 2. 28β — meaning SYNA is approximately 82% more volatile than SLAB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 80% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SYNA or MCHP or SWKS or MPWR or SLAB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is pulling ahead at 34. 3% versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Silicon Laboratories Inc. grew EPS 66. 6% year-over-year, compared to -138. 6% for Synaptics Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPWR leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SYNA or MCHP or SWKS or MPWR or SLAB?
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus -8. 3% for Silicon Laboratories Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPWR leads at 26. 1% versus -9. 0% for SLAB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLAB leads at 58. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SYNA or MCHP or SWKS or MPWR or SLAB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) trades at 13. 8x forward P/E versus 80. 4x for Silicon Laboratories Inc. — 66. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MPWR: 2. 5% to $1615. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SYNA or MCHP or SWKS or MPWR or SLAB?
In this comparison, SWKS (4.
3% yield), MCHP (1. 8% yield), MPWR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. SYNA, SLAB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SYNA or MCHP or SWKS or MPWR or SLAB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4. 3% yield). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SWKS: +31. 2%, MPWR: +24. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SYNA and MCHP and SWKS and MPWR and SLAB?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SYNA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MCHP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SWKS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SLAB is a small-cap high-growth stock. MCHP, SWKS pay a dividend while SYNA, MPWR, SLAB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.