Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SYNA vs MPWR vs MCHP vs SWKS vs AVGO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
SYNA vs MPWR vs MCHP vs SWKS vs AVGO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $4.13B | $77.41B | $54.97B | $9.78B | $1.96T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.17B | $2.79B | $4.37B | $4.04B | $68.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-48M | $616M | $-97M | $361M | $24.97B |
| Gross Margin | 43.6% | 55.2% | 51.6% | 41.1% | 67.1% |
| Operating Margin | -6.4% | 26.1% | 4.1% | 9.4% | 40.9% |
| Forward P/E | 28.1x | 67.2x | 63.2x | 13.8x | 36.5x |
| Total Debt | $880M | $24M | $5.67B | $1.20B | $65.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $392M | $1.10B | $772M | $1.16B | $16.18B |
SYNA vs MPWR vs MCHP vs SWKS vs AVGO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Synaptics Incorpora… (SYNA) | 100 | 196.8 | +96.8% |
| Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR) | 100 | 763.2 | +663.2% |
| Microchip Technolog… (MCHP) | 100 | 206.4 | +106.4% |
| Skyworks Solutions,… (SWKS) | 100 | 56.3 | -43.7% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | 100 | 1476.1 | +1376.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SYNA vs MPWR vs MCHP vs SWKS vs AVGO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SYNA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MPWR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and momentum.
- 26.4% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3%
- +148.6% vs SWKS's +1.5%
- 15.2% ROA vs SYNA's -1.9%, ROIC 22.2% vs -4.0%
Among these 5 stocks, MCHP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SWKS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.36, yield 4.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 20.9%, current ratio 2.33x
- Beta 1.36, yield 4.3%, current ratio 2.33x
- Lower P/E (13.8x vs 63.2x)
AVGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 23.9%, EPS growth 287.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.4%
- 29.0% 10Y total return vs MPWR's 24.9%
- PEG 0.73 vs MPWR's 2.28
- 36.6% margin vs SYNA's -4.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.4% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.8x vs 63.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.6% margin vs SYNA's -4.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.36 vs SYNA's 2.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs AVGO's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +148.6% vs SWKS's +1.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs SYNA's -1.9%, ROIC 22.2% vs -4.0% |
SYNA vs MPWR vs MCHP vs SWKS vs AVGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SYNA vs MPWR vs MCHP vs SWKS vs AVGO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AVGO leads in 2 of 6 categories
SWKS leads 1 • MPWR leads 1 • SYNA leads 0 • MCHP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $68.3B annually — 58.3x SYNA's $1.2B. AVGO is the more profitable business, keeping 36.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SYNA's -4.1%. On growth, AVGO holds the edge at +29.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $2.8B | $4.4B | $4.0B | $68.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | $781M | $881M | $842M | $38.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$48M | $616M | -$97M | $361M | $25.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $97M | $664M | $820M | $697M | $28.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.6% | +55.2% | +51.6% | +41.1% | +67.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.4% | +26.1% | +4.1% | +9.4% | +40.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | +22.1% | -2.2% | +8.9% | +36.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +23.8% | +18.8% | +17.2% | +42.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.4% | +20.8% | +15.6% | -1.0% | +29.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.5% | -88.4% | +164.2% | -44.2% | +31.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SWKS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.1x trailing earnings, SWKS trades at a 83% valuation discount to MPWR's 123.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AVGO offers better value at 1.73x vs MPWR's 4.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.1B | $77.4B | $55.0B | $9.8B | $1.96T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.6B | $76.3B | $59.9B | $9.8B | $2.00T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -86.72x | 123.60x | -9999.00x | 21.12x | 86.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 28.08x | 67.24x | 63.20x | 13.79x | 36.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.19x | — | — | 1.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 94.16x | 97.90x | 57.21x | 10.20x | 58.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.84x | 27.74x | 12.49x | 2.39x | 30.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.98x | 21.56x | 7.71x | 1.75x | 24.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.84x | 116.20x | 71.19x | 8.85x | 72.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AVGO delivers a 32.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SYNA. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVGO's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVGO scores 8/9 vs SWKS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.5% | +17.9% | -1.4% | +6.3% | +32.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.9% | +15.2% | -0.7% | +4.6% | +14.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.0% | +22.2% | +1.8% | +6.3% | +14.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.9% | +20.4% | +2.1% | +7.0% | +16.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.63x | 0.01x | 0.80x | 0.21x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $489M | -$1.1B | $4.9B | $42M | $49.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $392M | $1.1B | $772M | $1.2B | $16.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $880M | $24M | $5.7B | $1.2B | $65.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -30.00x | — | 0.78x | 14.46x | 9.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AVGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AVGO five years ago would be worth $93,355 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,449 for SWKS. Over the past 12 months, MPWR leads with a +148.6% total return vs SWKS's +1.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVGO at 88.2% vs SWKS's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.7% | +68.5% | +56.9% | +2.1% | +18.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +81.7% | +148.6% | +115.1% | +1.5% | +102.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.7% | +280.3% | +43.9% | -30.3% | +566.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.1% | +366.2% | +45.7% | -55.5% | +833.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.9% | +2494.7% | +373.8% | +31.2% | +2897.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.2% | +56.1% | +12.9% | -11.4% | +88.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MCHP and SWKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SWKS is the less volatile stock with a 1.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SYNA's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCHP currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs SWKS's 71.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.34x | 2.27x | 1.69x | 1.30x | 1.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $110.43 | $1662.00 | $103.17 | $90.90 | $437.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.80 | $613.00 | $46.92 | $51.92 | $198.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.8% | +94.8% | +98.5% | +71.6% | +94.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.5 | 71.0 | 82.5 | 55.9 | 68.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 739K | 577K | 9.0M | 3.3M | 23.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SWKS and AVGO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SYNA as "Buy", MPWR as "Buy", MCHP as "Buy", SWKS as "Buy", AVGO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.2% upside for SYNA (target: $115) vs -3.5% for SWKS (target: $63). For income investors, SWKS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.29% vs MPWR's 0.37%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $114.50 | $1615.00 | $106.35 | $62.75 | $443.72 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 25 | 46 | 59 | 58 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | +1.8% | +4.3% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 | 5 | 12 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.90 | $1.82 | $2.79 | $2.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | +0.0% | +0.2% | +0.5% | +0.3% |
AVGO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SWKS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SYNA vs MPWR vs MCHP vs SWKS vs AVGO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SYNA or MPWR or MCHP or SWKS or AVGO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the stronger pick with 26. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) offers the better valuation at 21. 1x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SYNA or MPWR or MCHP or SWKS or AVGO?
On trailing P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the cheapest at 21. 1x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. at 123. 6x. On forward P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Broadcom Inc. wins at 0. 73x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 28x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SYNA or MPWR or MCHP or SWKS or AVGO?
Over the past 5 years, Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) delivered a total return of +833. 6%, compared to -55. 5% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVGO returned +30. 2% versus SWKS's +33. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SYNA or MPWR or MCHP or SWKS or AVGO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus Synaptics Incorporated's 2. 34β — meaning SYNA is approximately 80% more volatile than SWKS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 80% for Broadcom Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SYNA or MPWR or MCHP or SWKS or AVGO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is pulling ahead at 26. 4% versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Broadcom Inc. grew EPS 287. 8% year-over-year, compared to -138. 6% for Synaptics Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVGO leads at 24. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SYNA or MPWR or MCHP or SWKS or AVGO?
Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 2% net margin versus -4. 4% for Synaptics Incorporated — meaning it keeps 36. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVGO leads at 39. 9% versus -8. 8% for SYNA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVGO leads at 67. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SYNA or MPWR or MCHP or SWKS or AVGO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 73x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 28x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) trades at 13. 8x forward P/E versus 67. 2x for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. — 53. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SYNA: 8. 2% to $114. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SYNA or MPWR or MCHP or SWKS or AVGO?
In this comparison, SWKS (4.
3% yield), MCHP (1. 8% yield), AVGO (0. 6% yield), MPWR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. SYNA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SYNA or MPWR or MCHP or SWKS or AVGO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4. 3% yield). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 27 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SWKS: +33. 9%, MPWR: +25. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SYNA and MPWR and MCHP and SWKS and AVGO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SYNA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MCHP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SWKS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AVGO is a mega-cap high-growth stock. MCHP, SWKS, AVGO pay a dividend while SYNA, MPWR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.