Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SYNX vs MNDO vs GILT vs SIFY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Communication Equipment
Telecommunications Services
SYNX vs MNDO vs GILT vs SIFY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Software - Application | Communication Equipment | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $8M | $21M | $1.38B | $1.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16M | $19M | $452M | $41.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $3M | $21M | $-1.50B |
| Gross Margin | 41.5% | 51.0% | 29.5% | 34.2% |
| Operating Margin | -22.2% | 10.7% | 3.6% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.8x | 38.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $908K | $929K | $11M | $39.51B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $8M | $169M | $5.00B |
SYNX vs MNDO vs GILT vs SIFY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silynxcom Ltd. (SYNX) | 100 | 39.0 | -61.0% |
| MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) | 100 | 47.8 | -52.2% |
| Gilat Satellite Net… (GILT) | 100 | 306.3 | +206.3% |
| Sify Technologies L… (SIFY) | 100 | 200.2 | +100.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SYNX vs MNDO vs GILT vs SIFY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SYNX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 16.4%, current ratio 3.19x
- Beta 0.05 vs GILT's 2.09
MNDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 21.6%
- Beta 0.07, yield 21.6%, current ratio 3.83x
- Better valuation composite
- 13.4% margin vs SYNX's -28.2%
GILT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 47.9%, EPS growth -22.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.5%
- 358.8% 10Y total return vs SIFY's 141.0%
- 47.9% revenue growth vs MNDO's -9.3%
SIFY is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +264.2% vs SYNX's -35.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 47.9% revenue growth vs MNDO's -9.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.4% margin vs SYNX's -28.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs GILT's 2.09 | |
| Dividends | 21.6% yield, vs SIFY's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +264.2% vs SYNX's -35.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs SYNX's -53.6%, ROIC 8.6% vs -40.6% |
SYNX vs MNDO vs GILT vs SIFY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SYNX vs MNDO vs GILT vs SIFY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MNDO leads in 3 of 6 categories
GILT leads 1 • SYNX leads 0 • SIFY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNDO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SIFY is the larger business by revenue, generating $41.4B annually — 2607.3x SYNX's $16M. MNDO is the more profitable business, keeping 13.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SYNX's -28.2%. On growth, GILT holds the edge at +75.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16M | $19M | $452M | $41.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $2M | $40M | $8.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $3M | $21M | -$1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $4M | $10M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.5% | +51.0% | +29.5% | +34.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -22.2% | +10.7% | +3.6% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -28.2% | +13.4% | +4.6% | -3.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.3% | +20.9% | +2.2% | -9.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -57.7% | -6.0% | +75.3% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -92.9% | -23.4% | -38.1% | -3.7% |
Valuation Metrics
MNDO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.8x trailing earnings, MNDO trades at a 86% valuation discount to GILT's 55.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNDO's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GILT's 27.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $21M | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $13M | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.67x | 7.77x | 55.41x | -119.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 38.78x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.68x | 27.81x | 18.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.88x | 1.06x | 3.05x | 2.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.13x | 0.90x | 2.27x | 4.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.20x | 150.06x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MNDO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNDO delivers a 11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-85 for SYNX. GILT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SIFY's 1.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SYNX scores 4/9 vs SIFY's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -85.3% | +11.9% | +4.1% | -7.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -53.6% | +8.6% | +2.8% | -1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -40.6% | +8.6% | +5.7% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -33.8% | +7.8% | +4.7% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.04x | 0.02x | 1.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$7M | -$158M | $34.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $8M | $169M | $5.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $908,000 | $929,000 | $11M | $39.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.34x | — | 5.18x | 0.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GILT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GILT five years ago would be worth $19,503 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,324 for SYNX. Over the past 12 months, SIFY leads with a +264.2% total return vs SYNX's -35.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GILT at 51.4% vs SYNX's -30.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.7% | -13.7% | +40.5% | +29.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.1% | -34.8% | +186.3% | +264.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.8% | -24.2% | +247.0% | +113.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.8% | -35.0% | +95.0% | -12.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.8% | +66.7% | +358.8% | +141.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.7% | -8.8% | +51.4% | +28.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SYNX and GILT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SYNX is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GILT's 2.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GILT currently trades 91.6% from its 52-week high vs SYNX's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.01x | 0.05x | 2.12x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.28 | $1.64 | $20.56 | $17.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.73 | $0.98 | $5.43 | $4.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.6% | +61.6% | +91.6% | +89.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.7 | 27.4 | 63.1 | 56.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 37K | 650K | 56K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MNDO and GILT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GILT as "Buy", SIFY as "Buy". MNDO is the only dividend payer here at 21.61% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $7.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +21.6% | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.22 | — | $0.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MNDO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GILT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SYNX vs MNDO vs GILT vs SIFY: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SYNX or MNDO or GILT or SIFY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) is the stronger pick with 47. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 3% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (GILT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SYNX or MNDO or GILT or SIFY?
On trailing P/E, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the cheapest at 7. 8x versus Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. at 55. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SYNX or MNDO or GILT or SIFY?
Over the past 5 years, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) delivered a total return of +95. 0%, compared to -66. 8% for Silynxcom Ltd. (SYNX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GILT returned +371. 3% versus SYNX's -67. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SYNX or MNDO or GILT or SIFY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silynxcom Ltd.
(SYNX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. 's 2. 12β — meaning GILT is approximately 14545% more volatile than SYNX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (GILT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 196% for Sify Technologies Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SYNX or MNDO or GILT or SIFY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) is pulling ahead at 47. 9% versus -9. 3% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Silynxcom Ltd. grew EPS 49. 4% year-over-year, compared to -877. 8% for Sify Technologies Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, GILT leads at 23. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SYNX or MNDO or GILT or SIFY?
MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 4% net margin versus -25. 8% for Silynxcom Ltd. — meaning it keeps 13. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNDO leads at 10. 7% versus -16. 2% for SYNX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNDO leads at 51. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — SYNX or MNDO or GILT or SIFY?
In this comparison, MNDO (21.
6% yield) pays a dividend. SYNX, GILT, SIFY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is SYNX or MNDO or GILT or SIFY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 21. 6% yield). Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (GILT) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNDO: +65. 7%, GILT: +371. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SYNX and MNDO and GILT and SIFY?
These companies operate in different sectors (SYNX (Technology) and MNDO (Technology) and GILT (Technology) and SIFY (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SYNX is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNDO is a small-cap deep-value stock; GILT is a small-cap high-growth stock; SIFY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MNDO pays a dividend while SYNX, GILT, SIFY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.