Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SYNX vs SGRP vs MMS vs KOSS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Specialty Business Services
Consumer Electronics
SYNX vs SGRP vs MMS vs KOSS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Specialty Business Services | Specialty Business Services | Consumer Electronics |
| Market Cap | $8M | $16M | $3.51B | $39M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16M | $147M | $5.32B | $13M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-22M | $373M | $-1M |
| Gross Margin | 41.5% | 20.7% | 24.6% | 35.6% |
| Operating Margin | -22.2% | -11.7% | 10.8% | -17.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 7.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $908K | $19M | $1.44B | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $18M | $260M | $3M |
SYNX vs SGRP vs MMS vs KOSS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silynxcom Ltd. (SYNX) | 100 | 39.0 | -61.0% |
| SPAR Group, Inc. (SGRP) | 100 | 64.8 | -35.2% |
| Maximus, Inc. (MMS) | 100 | 79.2 | -20.8% |
| Koss Corporation (KOSS) | 100 | 146.0 | +46.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SYNX vs SGRP vs MMS vs KOSS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SYNX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.1%, EPS growth 49.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 16.4%, current ratio 3.19x
- Beta 0.01, current ratio 3.19x
- 19.1% revenue growth vs SGRP's -5.5%
SGRP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MMS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 1.8%
- 35.3% 10Y total return vs KOSS's 90.0%
- 7.0% margin vs SYNX's -28.2%
- 1.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
KOSS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- -12.4% vs SGRP's -36.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.1% revenue growth vs SGRP's -5.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.0% margin vs SYNX's -28.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs KOSS's 1.58 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -12.4% vs SGRP's -36.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.8% ROA vs SYNX's -53.6%, ROIC 15.1% vs -40.6% |
SYNX vs SGRP vs MMS vs KOSS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SYNX vs SGRP vs MMS vs KOSS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MMS leads in 3 of 6 categories
SGRP leads 1 • KOSS leads 1 • SYNX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 414.1x KOSS's $13M. MMS is the more profitable business, keeping 7.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SYNX's -28.2%. On growth, SGRP holds the edge at +9.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16M | $147M | $5.3B | $13M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$16M | $645M | -$2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$22M | $373M | -$1M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$18M | $372M | -$1M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.5% | +20.7% | +24.6% | +35.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -22.2% | -11.7% | +10.8% | -17.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -28.2% | -14.7% | +7.0% | -8.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.3% | -12.0% | +7.0% | -11.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -57.7% | +9.6% | -4.1% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -92.9% | — | +6.5% | -77.5% |
Valuation Metrics
SGRP leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MMS's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SGRP's 14.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $16M | $3.5B | $39M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $17M | $4.7B | $39M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.64x | -5.13x | 11.66x | -44.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 7.72x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.14x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.65x | 6.49x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.87x | 0.37x | 0.65x | 3.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | 0.65x | 2.22x | 1.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 9.57x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MMS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MMS delivers a 21.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-130 for SGRP. KOSS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MMS's 0.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MMS scores 8/9 vs SGRP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -85.3% | -130.0% | +21.8% | -3.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -53.6% | -35.0% | +8.8% | -3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -40.6% | -1.8% | +15.1% | -4.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -33.8% | -2.8% | +17.4% | -4.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.78x | 0.86x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $712,000 | $1.2B | -$266,063 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $18M | $260M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $908,000 | $19M | $1.4B | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.34x | -7.80x | 4.93x | -3827.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KOSS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MMS five years ago would be worth $7,783 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,584 for KOSS. Over the past 12 months, KOSS leads with a -12.4% total return vs SGRP's -36.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KOSS at 1.6% vs SYNX's -30.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.8% | -25.0% | -25.3% | -4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.0% | -36.4% | -13.5% | -12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.0% | -33.9% | -14.6% | +4.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.0% | -61.4% | -22.2% | -74.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.0% | -30.5% | +35.3% | +90.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.9% | -12.9% | -5.1% | +1.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SYNX and MMS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SYNX is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KOSS's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MMS currently trades 64.3% from its 52-week high vs SGRP's 47.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.01x | 0.06x | 0.63x | 1.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.28 | $1.41 | $100.00 | $8.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.73 | $0.50 | $60.75 | $3.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.2% | +47.3% | +64.3% | +48.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 55.4 | 49.7 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 55K | 685K | 23K |
Analyst Outlook
MMS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
MMS is the only dividend payer here at 1.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $110.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 16 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.19 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +11.3% | +12.8% | 0.0% |
MMS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SGRP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SYNX vs SGRP vs MMS vs KOSS: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SYNX or SGRP or MMS or KOSS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Silynxcom Ltd.
(SYNX) is the stronger pick with 19. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for SPAR Group, Inc. (SGRP). Maximus, Inc. (MMS) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Maximus, Inc. (MMS) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SYNX or SGRP or MMS or KOSS?
Over the past 5 years, Maximus, Inc.
(MMS) delivered a total return of -22. 2%, compared to -74. 2% for Koss Corporation (KOSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KOSS returned +90. 0% versus SYNX's -67. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SYNX or SGRP or MMS or KOSS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silynxcom Ltd.
(SYNX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Koss Corporation's 1. 58β — meaning KOSS is approximately 10771% more volatile than SYNX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Koss Corporation (KOSS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 86% for Maximus, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SYNX or SGRP or MMS or KOSS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silynxcom Ltd.
(SYNX) is pulling ahead at 19. 1% versus -5. 5% for SPAR Group, Inc. (SGRP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Silynxcom Ltd. grew EPS 49. 4% year-over-year, compared to -181. 3% for SPAR Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMS leads at 5. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SYNX or SGRP or MMS or KOSS?
Maximus, Inc.
(MMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 9% net margin versus -25. 8% for Silynxcom Ltd. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MMS leads at 10. 6% versus -16. 2% for SYNX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SYNX leads at 41. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SYNX or SGRP or MMS or KOSS?
In this comparison, MMS (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. SYNX, SGRP, KOSS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is SYNX or SGRP or MMS or KOSS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Maximus, Inc.
(MMS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), 1. 8% yield). Koss Corporation (KOSS) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MMS: +35. 3%, KOSS: +90. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SYNX and SGRP and MMS and KOSS?
These companies operate in different sectors (SYNX (Technology) and SGRP (Industrials) and MMS (Industrials) and KOSS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SYNX is a small-cap high-growth stock; SGRP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MMS is a small-cap deep-value stock; KOSS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MMS pays a dividend while SYNX, SGRP, KOSS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.