Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SYNX vs SGRP vs MMS vs KOSS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyAMEX • IL
Market Cap$8M
5Y Perf.-61.0%
SGRP
SPAR Group, Inc.

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$16M
5Y Perf.-35.2%
MMS
Maximus, Inc.

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.51B
5Y Perf.-20.8%
KOSS
Koss Corporation

Consumer Electronics

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$39M
5Y Perf.+46.0%

SYNX vs SGRP vs MMS vs KOSS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SYNX logoSYNX
SGRP logoSGRP
MMS logoMMS
KOSS logoKOSS
IndustryCommunication EquipmentSpecialty Business ServicesSpecialty Business ServicesConsumer Electronics
Market Cap$8M$16M$3.51B$39M
Revenue (TTM)$16M$147M$5.32B$13M
Net Income (TTM)$-4M$-22M$373M$-1M
Gross Margin41.5%20.7%24.6%35.6%
Operating Margin-22.2%-11.7%10.8%-17.3%
Forward P/E7.7x
Total Debt$908K$19M$1.44B$3M
Cash & Equiv.$3M$18M$260M$3M

SYNX vs SGRP vs MMS vs KOSSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SYNX
SGRP
MMS
KOSS
StockJan 24May 26Return
Silynxcom Ltd. (SYNX)10039.0-61.0%
SPAR Group, Inc. (SGRP)10064.8-35.2%
Maximus, Inc. (MMS)10079.2-20.8%
Koss Corporation (KOSS)100146.0+46.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SYNX vs SGRP vs MMS vs KOSS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MMS leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Silynxcom Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. KOSS also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
The Growth Play

SYNX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 19.1%, EPS growth 49.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 16.4%, current ratio 3.19x
  • Beta 0.01, current ratio 3.19x
  • 19.1% revenue growth vs SGRP's -5.5%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
SGRP
SPAR Group, Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

SGRP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
MMS
Maximus, Inc.
The Income Pick

MMS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 1.8%
  • 35.3% 10Y total return vs KOSS's 90.0%
  • 7.0% margin vs SYNX's -28.2%
  • 1.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
KOSS
Koss Corporation
The Momentum Pick

KOSS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • -12.4% vs SGRP's -36.4%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSYNX logoSYNX19.1% revenue growth vs SGRP's -5.5%
Quality / MarginsMMS logoMMS7.0% margin vs SYNX's -28.2%
Stability / SafetySYNX logoSYNXBeta 0.01 vs KOSS's 1.58
DividendsMMS logoMMS1.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)KOSS logoKOSS-12.4% vs SGRP's -36.4%
Efficiency (ROA)MMS logoMMS8.8% ROA vs SYNX's -53.6%, ROIC 15.1% vs -40.6%

SYNX vs SGRP vs MMS vs KOSS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SYNXSilynxcom Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

SGRPSPAR Group, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MMSMaximus, Inc.
FY 2025
Clinical Services
86.6%$2.1B
Advanced Technology Solutions
13.4%$325M
KOSSKoss Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

SYNX vs SGRP vs MMS vs KOSS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMMSLAGGINGSYNX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 414.1x KOSS's $13M. MMS is the more profitable business, keeping 7.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SYNX's -28.2%. On growth, SGRP holds the edge at +9.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSYNX logoSYNXSilynxcom Ltd.SGRP logoSGRPSPAR Group, Inc.MMS logoMMSMaximus, Inc.KOSS logoKOSSKoss Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$16M$147M$5.3B$13M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$3M-$16M$645M-$2M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$4M-$22M$373M-$1M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$3M-$18M$372M-$1M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+41.5%+20.7%+24.6%+35.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-22.2%-11.7%+10.8%-17.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-28.2%-14.7%+7.0%-8.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-16.3%-12.0%+7.0%-11.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-57.7%+9.6%-4.1%+1.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-92.9%+6.5%-77.5%
MMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SGRP leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, MMS's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SGRP's 14.6x.

MetricSYNX logoSYNXSilynxcom Ltd.SGRP logoSGRPSPAR Group, Inc.MMS logoMMSMaximus, Inc.KOSS logoKOSSKoss Corporation
Market CapShares × price$8M$16M$3.5B$39M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6M$17M$4.7B$39M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.64x-5.13x11.66x-44.54x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.72x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.14x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.65x6.49x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.87x0.37x0.65x3.12x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.12x0.65x2.22x1.27x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.57x
SGRP leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MMS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

MMS delivers a 21.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-130 for SGRP. KOSS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MMS's 0.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MMS scores 8/9 vs SGRP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSYNX logoSYNXSilynxcom Ltd.SGRP logoSGRPSPAR Group, Inc.MMS logoMMSMaximus, Inc.KOSS logoKOSSKoss Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-85.3%-130.0%+21.8%-3.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-53.6%-35.0%+8.8%-3.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-40.6%-1.8%+15.1%-4.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-33.8%-2.8%+17.4%-4.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94385
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.16x0.78x0.86x0.08x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$2M$712,000$1.2B-$266,063
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$18M$260M$3M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$908,000$19M$1.4B$3M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-8.34x-7.80x4.93x-3827.70x
MMS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KOSS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MMS five years ago would be worth $7,783 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,584 for KOSS. Over the past 12 months, KOSS leads with a -12.4% total return vs SGRP's -36.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KOSS at 1.6% vs SYNX's -30.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSYNX logoSYNXSilynxcom Ltd.SGRP logoSGRPSPAR Group, Inc.MMS logoMMSMaximus, Inc.KOSS logoKOSSKoss Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+0.8%-25.0%-25.3%-4.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-36.0%-36.4%-13.5%-12.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-67.0%-33.9%-14.6%+4.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-67.0%-61.4%-22.2%-74.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-67.0%-30.5%+35.3%+90.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-30.9%-12.9%-5.1%+1.6%
KOSS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SYNX and MMS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SYNX is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KOSS's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MMS currently trades 64.3% from its 52-week high vs SGRP's 47.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSYNX logoSYNXSilynxcom Ltd.SGRP logoSGRPSPAR Group, Inc.MMS logoMMSMaximus, Inc.KOSS logoKOSSKoss Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.01x0.06x0.63x1.58x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.28$1.41$100.00$8.59
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.73$0.50$60.75$3.50
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+52.2%+47.3%+64.3%+48.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.355.449.750.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.7M55K685K23K
Evenly matched — SYNX and MMS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MMS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

MMS is the only dividend payer here at 1.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricSYNX logoSYNXSilynxcom Ltd.SGRP logoSGRPSPAR Group, Inc.MMS logoMMSMaximus, Inc.KOSS logoKOSSKoss Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$110.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts16
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises20
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.19
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+11.3%+12.8%0.0%
MMS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MMS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SGRP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallMaximus, Inc. (MMS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SYNX vs SGRP vs MMS vs KOSS: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SYNX or SGRP or MMS or KOSS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Silynxcom Ltd.

(SYNX) is the stronger pick with 19. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for SPAR Group, Inc. (SGRP). Maximus, Inc. (MMS) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Maximus, Inc. (MMS) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — SYNX or SGRP or MMS or KOSS?

Over the past 5 years, Maximus, Inc.

(MMS) delivered a total return of -22. 2%, compared to -74. 2% for Koss Corporation (KOSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KOSS returned +90. 0% versus SYNX's -67. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — SYNX or SGRP or MMS or KOSS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silynxcom Ltd.

(SYNX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Koss Corporation's 1. 58β — meaning KOSS is approximately 10771% more volatile than SYNX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Koss Corporation (KOSS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 86% for Maximus, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — SYNX or SGRP or MMS or KOSS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silynxcom Ltd.

(SYNX) is pulling ahead at 19. 1% versus -5. 5% for SPAR Group, Inc. (SGRP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Silynxcom Ltd. grew EPS 49. 4% year-over-year, compared to -181. 3% for SPAR Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMS leads at 5. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — SYNX or SGRP or MMS or KOSS?

Maximus, Inc.

(MMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 9% net margin versus -25. 8% for Silynxcom Ltd. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MMS leads at 10. 6% versus -16. 2% for SYNX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SYNX leads at 41. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — SYNX or SGRP or MMS or KOSS?

In this comparison, MMS (1.

8% yield) pays a dividend. SYNX, SGRP, KOSS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is SYNX or SGRP or MMS or KOSS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Maximus, Inc.

(MMS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), 1. 8% yield). Koss Corporation (KOSS) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MMS: +35. 3%, KOSS: +90. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between SYNX and SGRP and MMS and KOSS?

These companies operate in different sectors (SYNX (Technology) and SGRP (Industrials) and MMS (Industrials) and KOSS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SYNX is a small-cap high-growth stock; SGRP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MMS is a small-cap deep-value stock; KOSS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MMS pays a dividend while SYNX, SGRP, KOSS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SYNX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SGRP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MMS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KOSS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SYNX and SGRP and MMS and KOSS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SYNX: -57.7% · SGRP: 9.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.