Comprehensive Stock Comparison

Compare AT&T Inc. (T) vs Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) Stock

Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.

Tickers 2 / 10100+ Metrics

Selected Stocks

Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.

2 / 10
T
T
Try these comparisons:

Quick Verdict

CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNFLX15.9% revenue growth vs T's 2.7%
ValueTLower P/E (12.3x vs 30.8x)
Quality / MarginsNFLX24.3% net margin vs T's 17.4%
Stability / SafetyTBeta 0.12 vs NFLX's 0.76
DividendsT4.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; NFLX pays no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)T+6.2% vs NFLX's -1.9%
Efficiency (ROA)NFLX19.8% ROA vs T's 5.2%, ROIC 29.8% vs 7.0%
Bottom line: T leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the stronger pick for investors who prioritize valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Netflix, Inc. is the better choice for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As direct sector peers, they can serve as alternatives in the same portfolio allocation.

Who Each Stock Is For

Income & stability

Growth exposure

Long-term compounding (10Y)

Sleep-well-at-night portfolio

Defensive / Recession hedge

Business Model

What each company does and how it makes money

TAT&T Inc.
Communication Services

AT&T is a major telecommunications company providing wireless, broadband, and enterprise connectivity services across the United States and Latin America. It generates revenue primarily from wireless services (~60% of total), broadband internet, and business solutions including cloud and security services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its extensive nationwide wireless network infrastructure and fiber footprint, which create significant switching costs for customers and high barriers to entry for competitors.

NFLXNetflix, Inc.
Communication Services

Netflix is a global streaming entertainment service that offers original and licensed TV shows, movies, and documentaries. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees — with three pricing tiers — and earns additional income from licensing its original content to other platforms. Its key advantage is its massive scale and data-driven content creation, which allows it to invest billions in programming that attracts and retains subscribers worldwide.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TAT&T Inc.
FY 2024
Wireless Service
55.6%$68.0B
Other Capitalized Property Plant and Equipment
18.1%$22.2B
Business Service
14.8%$18.1B
IP Broadband
9.2%$11.2B
Legacy Voice and Data
1.2%$1.5B
Other Service
1.1%$1.3B
NFLXNetflix, Inc.
FY 2024
Streaming
100.0%$39.0B

Financial Metrics Comparison

Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging

Financial Scorecard

NFLX 3T 2
Financial MetricsNFLX5/6 metrics
Valuation MetricsT6/6 metrics
Profitability & EfficiencyNFLX8/8 metrics
Total ReturnsNFLX4/6 metrics
Risk & VolatilityT2/2 metrics
Analyst Outlook0/0 metrics

NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). T leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).

Financial Metrics (TTM)

T is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.6B annually — 2.8x NFLX's $45.2B. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to T's 17.4%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTAT&T Inc.NFLXNetflix, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$125.6B$45.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$45.0B$30.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$21.9B$11.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$19.4B$9.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+79.8%+48.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+19.2%+29.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+17.4%+24.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+15.5%+20.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.6%+17.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-7.1%+31.1%
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

At 9.2x trailing earnings, T trades at a 76% valuation discount to NFLX's 38.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, T's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NFLX's 13.7x.

MetricTAT&T Inc.NFLXNetflix, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$196.0B$407.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$332.8B$413.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS9.21x38.04x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.26x30.75x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.15x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.39x13.74x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.56x9.03x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.59x15.61x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.08x43.10x
T leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $17 for T. NFLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to T's 1.23x.

MetricTAT&T Inc.NFLXNetflix, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.3%+41.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.2%+19.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.0%+29.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.8%+30.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–977
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.23x0.54x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$136.8B$5.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$18.2B$9.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$155.0B$14.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.55x17.33x
NFLX leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (with DRIP)

A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,479 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,283 for T. Over the past 12 months, T leads with a +6.2% total return vs NFLX's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 44.0% vs T's 18.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTAT&T Inc.NFLXNetflix, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+15.1%+5.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+6.2%-1.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+65.7%+198.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+62.8%+74.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+59.8%+930.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+18.3%+44.0%
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

T is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NFLX's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. T currently trades 94.0% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTAT&T Inc.NFLXNetflix, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.12x0.76x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$29.79$134.12
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$22.95$75.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.0%+71.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.655.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded36.9M38.8M
T leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Wall Street rates T as "Hold" and NFLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.8% upside for NFLX (target: $117) vs 4.0% for T (target: $29). T is the only dividend payer here at 4.07% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricTAT&T Inc.NFLXNetflix, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.12$117.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts6197
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.14
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.3%+2.2%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Historical Charts

Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.

Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)

StockMar 20Feb 26Change
AT&T Inc. (T)10093.73-6.3%
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)100217.16+117.2%

Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) returned +75% over 5 years vs AT&T Inc. (T)'s +63%. A $10,000 investment in NFLX 5 years ago would be worth $17,479 today (including dividends reinvested).

Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
AT&T Inc. (T)$163.8B$125.6B-23.3%
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)$8.8B$45.2B+411.7%

AT&T Inc.'s revenue grew from $163.8B (2016) to $125.6B (2025) — a -2.9% CAGR. Netflix, Inc.'s revenue grew from $8.8B (2016) to $45.2B (2025) — a 19.9% CAGR.

Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
AT&T Inc. (T)7.9%17.4%+119.9%
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)2.1%24.3%+1049.7%

AT&T Inc.'s net margin went from 8% (2016) to 17% (2025). Netflix, Inc.'s net margin went from 2% (2016) to 24% (2025).

Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years

Stock20172025Change
AT&T Inc. (T)6.28.2+32.3%
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)153.637.1-75.8%

AT&T Inc. has traded in a 6x–16x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~9x. Netflix, Inc. has traded in a 30x–154x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~38x.

Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
AT&T Inc. (T)2.13.04+44.8%
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)0.042.53+5783.7%

AT&T Inc.'s EPS grew from $2.10 (2016) to $3.04 (2025) — a 4% CAGR. Netflix, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.04 (2016) to $2.53 (2025) — a 57% CAGR.

Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years

2021
$10B
$-132M
2022
$12B
$2B
2023
$20B
$7B
2024
$19B
$7B
2025
$19B
$9B
AT&T Inc. (T)Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)

AT&T Inc. generated $19B FCF in 2025 (+97% vs 2021). Netflix, Inc. generated $9B FCF in 2025 (+7269% vs 2021).

Loading custom metrics...

T vs NFLX: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is T or NFLX a better buy right now?

AT&T Inc. (T) offers the better valuation at 9.2x trailing P/E (12.3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 97 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — T or NFLX?

On trailing P/E, AT&T Inc. (T) is the cheapest at 9.2x versus Netflix, Inc. at 38.0x. On forward P/E, AT&T Inc. is actually cheaper at 12.3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — T or NFLX?

Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) delivered a total return of +74.8%, compared to +62.8% for AT&T Inc. (T). A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth approximately $17K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +930.4% versus T's +59.8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — T or NFLX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AT&T Inc. (T) is the lower-risk stock at 0.12β versus Netflix, Inc.'s 0.76β — meaning NFLX is approximately 555% more volatile than T relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 123% for AT&T Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which has better profit margins — T or NFLX?

Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24.3% net margin versus 17.4% for AT&T Inc. — meaning it keeps 24.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29.5% versus 19.2% for T. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — T leads at 79.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is T or NFLX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, AT&T Inc. (T) trades at 12.3x forward P/E versus 30.8x for Netflix, Inc. — 18.5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 21.8% to $117.25.

07

Which pays a better dividend — T or NFLX?

In this comparison, T (4.1% yield) pays a dividend. NFLX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is T or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AT&T Inc. (T) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.12), 4.1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (T: +59.8%, NFLX: +930.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between T and NFLX?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: T is a mid-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap quality compounder stock. T pays a dividend while NFLX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.

💰
Stocks Like

T

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.6%
Run This Screen
🚀
Stocks Like

NFLX

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Better Than Both

Find stocks that beat T and NFLX on the metrics you choose

Revenue Growth>
%
(T: 3.6% · NFLX: 17.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(T: 17.4% · NFLX: 24.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(T: 9.2x · NFLX: 38.0x)