Computer Hardware
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TACT vs TRMB vs KEYS vs NOVT vs MKSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
TACT vs TRMB vs KEYS vs NOVT vs MKSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $35M | $14.65B | $60.85B | $4.86B | $20.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $51M | $3.69B | $5.68B | $981M | $4.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $456M | $958M | $54M | $327M |
| Gross Margin | 48.6% | 68.8% | 61.9% | 44.4% | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | -2.7% | 17.7% | 16.0% | 11.9% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.0x | 39.8x | 38.2x | 30.4x |
| Total Debt | $561K | $1.39B | $2.97B | $342M | $4.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $253M | $1.87B | $381M | $675M |
TACT vs TRMB vs KEYS vs NOVT vs MKSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TransAct Technologi… (TACT) | 100 | 85.1 | -14.9% |
| Trimble Inc. (TRMB) | 100 | 158.1 | +58.1% |
| Keysight Technologi… (KEYS) | 100 | 328.1 | +228.1% |
| Novanta Inc. (NOVT) | 100 | 132.7 | +32.7% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 284.8 | +184.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TACT vs TRMB vs KEYS vs NOVT vs MKSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TACT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.32
- Rev growth 18.7%, EPS growth 87.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 2.97x
- Beta 0.32, current ratio 2.97x
TRMB is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (20.0x vs 30.4x)
KEYS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 12.8% 10Y total return vs NOVT's 8.5%
- PEG 4.97 vs NOVT's 11.61
- 16.9% margin vs TACT's -2.4%
- 8.3% ROA vs TACT's -2.8%, ROIC 11.5% vs -6.7%
Among these 5 stocks, NOVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MKSI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends and momentum.
- 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +306.1% vs TRMB's -6.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.7% revenue growth vs TRMB's -2.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.0x vs 30.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.9% margin vs TACT's -2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs MKSI's 2.64, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +306.1% vs TRMB's -6.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.3% ROA vs TACT's -2.8%, ROIC 11.5% vs -6.7% |
TACT vs TRMB vs KEYS vs NOVT vs MKSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TACT vs TRMB vs KEYS vs NOVT vs MKSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KEYS leads in 2 of 6 categories
TACT leads 2 • MKSI leads 1 • TRMB leads 0 • NOVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KEYS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KEYS is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.7B annually — 110.3x TACT's $51M. KEYS is the more profitable business, keeping 16.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TACT's -2.4%. On growth, KEYS holds the edge at +23.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $51M | $3.7B | $5.7B | $981M | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$743,000 | $785M | $1.2B | $179M | $945M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | $456M | $958M | $54M | $327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $253M | $1.5B | $48M | $401M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.6% | +68.8% | +61.9% | +44.4% | +45.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | +17.7% | +16.0% | +11.9% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +12.4% | +16.9% | +5.5% | +8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +6.9% | +25.8% | +4.9% | +9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | +11.8% | +23.3% | +8.5% | +15.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +86.1% | +55.6% | +68.0% | -2.2% | +53.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TACT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 35.3x trailing earnings, TRMB trades at a 62% valuation discount to NOVT's 92.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KEYS offers better value at 9.08x vs NOVT's 28.13x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35M | $14.7B | $60.9B | $4.9B | $20.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15M | $15.8B | $62.0B | $4.8B | $24.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -29.08x | 35.34x | 72.70x | 92.71x | 68.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.01x | 39.84x | 38.25x | 30.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 14.39x | 9.08x | 28.13x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.05x | 50.65x | 27.00x | 26.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.69x | 4.08x | 11.32x | 4.96x | 5.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.13x | 2.54x | 10.44x | 3.81x | 7.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.67x | 110.00x | 47.50x | 100.38x | 40.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KEYS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KEYS delivers a 15.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-4 for TACT. TACT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKSI scores 6/9 vs NOVT's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.0% | +8.0% | +15.4% | +4.1% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.8% | +5.0% | +8.3% | +3.0% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.7% | +6.8% | +11.5% | +7.4% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.5% | +7.8% | +11.0% | +8.3% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.24x | 0.51x | 0.26x | 1.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | $1.1B | $1.1B | -$39M | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $253M | $1.9B | $381M | $675M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $561,000 | $1.4B | $3.0B | $342M | $4.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -16.34x | 12.26x | 11.03x | 4.89x | 2.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MKSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KEYS five years ago would be worth $24,740 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,750 for TACT. Over the past 12 months, MKSI leads with a +306.1% total return vs TRMB's -6.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MKSI at 54.1% vs TACT's -15.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.1% | -21.0% | +71.7% | +22.6% | +78.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.2% | -6.7% | +137.2% | +14.6% | +306.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.8% | +30.1% | +147.9% | -15.2% | +266.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.5% | -22.0% | +147.4% | +5.7% | +66.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.3% | +166.8% | +1279.4% | +853.7% | +750.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.6% | +9.2% | +35.3% | -5.3% | +54.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TACT and KEYS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TACT is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MKSI's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KEYS currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs TACT's 61.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.32x | 1.46x | 1.71x | 2.02x | 2.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.70 | $87.50 | $367.12 | $149.95 | $326.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.06 | $61.63 | $146.23 | $98.27 | $71.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.2% | +70.7% | +96.6% | +90.9% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.0 | 36.8 | 75.0 | 62.6 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 37K | 1.7M | 1.3M | 375K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
TACT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TRMB as "Buy", KEYS as "Buy", NOVT as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 53.6% upside for TRMB (target: $95) vs -18.5% for KEYS (target: $289). MKSI is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $95.00 | $289.25 | $150.00 | $272.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 | 15 | 3 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.9% | +0.6% | +0.8% | +0.2% |
KEYS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TACT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
TACT vs TRMB vs KEYS vs NOVT vs MKSI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TACT or TRMB or KEYS or NOVT or MKSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TransAct Technologies Incorporated (TACT) is the stronger pick with 18.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 6% for Trimble Inc. (TRMB). Trimble Inc. (TRMB) offers the better valuation at 35. 3x trailing P/E (20. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Trimble Inc. (TRMB) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TACT or TRMB or KEYS or NOVT or MKSI?
On trailing P/E, Trimble Inc.
(TRMB) is the cheapest at 35. 3x versus Novanta Inc. at 92. 7x. On forward P/E, Trimble Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Keysight Technologies, Inc. wins at 4. 97x versus Novanta Inc. 's 11. 61x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TACT or TRMB or KEYS or NOVT or MKSI?
Over the past 5 years, Keysight Technologies, Inc.
(KEYS) delivered a total return of +147. 4%, compared to -72. 5% for TransAct Technologies Incorporated (TACT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KEYS returned +1279% versus TACT's -41. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TACT or TRMB or KEYS or NOVT or MKSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TransAct Technologies Incorporated (TACT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
32β versus MKS Inc. 's 2. 64β — meaning MKSI is approximately 735% more volatile than TACT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TransAct Technologies Incorporated (TACT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TACT or TRMB or KEYS or NOVT or MKSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TransAct Technologies Incorporated (TACT) is pulling ahead at 18.
7% versus -2. 6% for Trimble Inc. (TRMB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TransAct Technologies Incorporated grew EPS 87. 9% year-over-year, compared to -71. 3% for Trimble Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NOVT leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TACT or TRMB or KEYS or NOVT or MKSI?
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
(KEYS) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 7% net margin versus -2. 4% for TransAct Technologies Incorporated — meaning it keeps 15. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KEYS leads at 17. 6% versus -2. 7% for TACT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMB leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TACT or TRMB or KEYS or NOVT or MKSI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Keysight Technologies, Inc. (KEYS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 4. 97x versus Novanta Inc. 's 11. 61x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Trimble Inc. (TRMB) trades at 20. 0x forward P/E versus 39. 8x for Keysight Technologies, Inc. — 19. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRMB: 53. 6% to $95. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TACT or TRMB or KEYS or NOVT or MKSI?
In this comparison, MKSI (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. TACT, TRMB, KEYS, NOVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TACT or TRMB or KEYS or NOVT or MKSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TransAct Technologies Incorporated (TACT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
32)). MKS Inc. (MKSI) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TACT: -41. 3%, MKSI: +750. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TACT and TRMB and KEYS and NOVT and MKSI?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TACT is a small-cap high-growth stock; TRMB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KEYS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NOVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.