Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TAOP vs LIQT vs POWI vs CCSI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TAOP
Taoping Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$1M
5Y Perf.-99.8%
LIQT
LiqTech International, Inc.

Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls

IndustrialsNASDAQ • DK
Market Cap$22M
5Y Perf.-94.8%
POWI
Power Integrations, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.00B
5Y Perf.-26.0%
CCSI
Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$520M
5Y Perf.-4.6%

TAOP vs LIQT vs POWI vs CCSI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TAOP logoTAOP
LIQT logoLIQT
POWI logoPOWI
CCSI logoCCSI
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureIndustrial - Pollution & Treatment ControlsSemiconductorsSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$1M$22M$4.00B$520M
Revenue (TTM)$36M$17M$446M$351M
Net Income (TTM)$-7M$-9M$17M$88M
Gross Margin14.9%4.9%53.9%80.2%
Operating Margin-15.7%-50.0%4.6%42.9%
Forward P/E58.7x6.5x
Total Debt$10M$12M$0.00$580M
Cash & Equiv.$2M$59M$75M

TAOP vs LIQT vs POWI vs CCSILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TAOP
LIQT
POWI
CCSI
StockSep 21May 26Return
Taoping Inc. (TAOP)1000.2-99.8%
LiqTech Internation… (LIQT)1005.2-94.8%
Power Integrations,… (POWI)10074.0-26.0%
Consensus Cloud Sol… (CCSI)10095.4-4.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TAOP vs LIQT vs POWI vs CCSI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LIQT and CCSI are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. POWI also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TAOP
Taoping Inc.
The Secondary Option

TAOP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
LIQT
LiqTech International, Inc.
The Growth Play

LIQT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 45.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.52
  • 13.0% revenue growth vs TAOP's -16.0%
  • Beta 0.52 vs TAOP's 2.30
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
POWI
Power Integrations, Inc.
The Income Pick

POWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 2.08, yield 1.2%
  • 232.7% 10Y total return vs CCSI's -20.6%
  • Beta 2.08, yield 1.2%, current ratio 6.51x
  • 1.2% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
CCSI
Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
The Value Play

CCSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (6.5x vs 58.7x)
  • 25.1% margin vs LIQT's -53.3%
  • 13.2% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 22.2% vs -31.1%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLIQT logoLIQT13.0% revenue growth vs TAOP's -16.0%
ValueCCSI logoCCSILower P/E (6.5x vs 58.7x)
Quality / MarginsCCSI logoCCSI25.1% margin vs LIQT's -53.3%
Stability / SafetyLIQT logoLIQTBeta 0.52 vs TAOP's 2.30
DividendsPOWI logoPOWI1.2% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LIQT logoLIQT+64.8% vs TAOP's -78.3%
Efficiency (ROA)CCSI logoCCSI13.2% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 22.2% vs -31.1%

TAOP vs LIQT vs POWI vs CCSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TAOPTaoping Inc.
FY 2025
Product
75.0%$23M
Advertising
13.7%$4M
Revenue Project
5.8%$2M
Software
4.6%$1M
Product and Service, Other
0.8%$243,254
Service
0.2%$55,129
Other Related Parties
0.0%$3,805
LIQTLiqTech International, Inc.
FY 2024
Ceramics Segment
38.6%$6M
Water Segment
37.9%$6M
Plastics Segment
23.2%$3M
Corporate Segment
0.3%$49,496
POWIPower Integrations, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CCSIConsensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
FY 2025
Corporate Information Delivery Services
63.7%$223M
Small Office Home Office Information Delivery Services
36.3%$127M
Other Information Delivery Services
0.0%$12,000

TAOP vs LIQT vs POWI vs CCSI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPOWILAGGINGLIQT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CCSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

POWI is the larger business by revenue, generating $446M annually — 26.6x LIQT's $17M. CCSI is the more profitable business, keeping 25.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LIQT's -53.3%. On growth, LIQT holds the edge at +53.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTAOP logoTAOPTaoping Inc.LIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…CCSI logoCCSIConsensus Cloud S…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$36M$17M$446M$351M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$4M-$6M$41M$164M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$7M-$9M$17M$88M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$3M-$7M$85M$112M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+14.9%+4.9%+53.9%+80.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-15.7%-50.0%+4.6%+42.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-19.6%-53.3%+3.7%+25.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-8.1%-39.3%+18.9%+32.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.6%+53.6%+2.6%+1.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-51.7%+69.4%-60.0%+21.5%
CCSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — TAOP and CCSI each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 6.5x trailing earnings, CCSI trades at a 96% valuation discount to POWI's 184.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CCSI's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than POWI's 79.7x.

MetricTAOP logoTAOPTaoping Inc.LIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…CCSI logoCCSIConsensus Cloud S…
Market CapShares × price$1M$22M$4.0B$520M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9M$34M$3.9B$1.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.16x-2.59x184.18x6.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.58.74x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple79.69x6.07x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.04x1.35x9.02x1.49x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.08x2.14x6.01x39.95x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF45.93x4.92x
Evenly matched — TAOP and CCSI each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CCSI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

CCSI delivers a 52.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $53 in annual profit, vs $-70 for LIQT. TAOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CCSI's 42.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), POWI scores 6/9 vs LIQT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricTAOP logoTAOPTaoping Inc.LIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…CCSI logoCCSIConsensus Cloud S…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-46.7%-70.0%+2.4%+52.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-21.7%-29.5%+2.1%+13.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-27.1%-31.1%+2.4%+22.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-38.0%+2.9%+26.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92265
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.50x1.17x42.14x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$8M$12M-$59M$506M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2M$59M$75M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10M$12M$0$580M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-52.63x-13.46x5.95x
CCSI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

POWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in POWI five years ago would be worth $9,165 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7 for TAOP. Over the past 12 months, LIQT leads with a +64.8% total return vs TAOP's -78.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors POWI at -2.2% vs TAOP's -80.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTAOP logoTAOPTaoping Inc.LIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…CCSI logoCCSIConsensus Cloud S…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-6.8%+54.9%+93.2%+30.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-78.3%+64.8%+44.4%+26.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.3%-31.3%-6.3%-21.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-96.1%-8.3%-20.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-90.9%+232.7%-20.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-80.9%-11.8%-2.2%-7.9%
POWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LIQT and POWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LIQT is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TAOP's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. POWI currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs TAOP's 6.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTAOP logoTAOPTaoping Inc.LIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…CCSI logoCCSIConsensus Cloud S…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.26x0.54x2.11x1.53x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$20.10$3.35$78.94$31.66
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.18$1.30$30.86$19.24
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+6.4%+68.9%+91.0%+89.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.157.076.151.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded20K50K967K123K
Evenly matched — LIQT and POWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

POWI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: POWI as "Buy", CCSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.0% upside for POWI (target: $79) vs -11.6% for CCSI (target: $25). POWI is the only dividend payer here at 1.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricTAOP logoTAOPTaoping Inc.LIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…CCSI logoCCSIConsensus Cloud S…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$79.00$25.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts166
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1181
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.84
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+2.5%+4.4%
POWI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CCSI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). POWI leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallPower Integrations, Inc. (POWI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TAOP vs LIQT vs POWI vs CCSI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TAOP or LIQT or POWI or CCSI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, LiqTech International, Inc.

(LIQT) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 0% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) offers the better valuation at 6. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TAOP or LIQT or POWI or CCSI?

On trailing P/E, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.

(CCSI) is the cheapest at 6. 5x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 184. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TAOP or LIQT or POWI or CCSI?

Over the past 5 years, Power Integrations, Inc.

(POWI) delivered a total return of -8. 3%, compared to -99. 9% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: POWI returned +239. 0% versus TAOP's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TAOP or LIQT or POWI or CCSI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LiqTech International, Inc.

(LIQT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Taoping Inc. 's 2. 26β — meaning TAOP is approximately 320% more volatile than LIQT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Taoping Inc. (TAOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 42% for Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TAOP or LIQT or POWI or CCSI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), LiqTech International, Inc.

(LIQT) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus -16. 0% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LiqTech International, Inc. grew EPS 45. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1870. 0% for Taoping Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TAOP leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TAOP or LIQT or POWI or CCSI?

Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.

(CCSI) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 2% net margin versus -51. 7% for LiqTech International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCSI leads at 43. 0% versus -50. 3% for LIQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCSI leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TAOP or LIQT or POWI or CCSI more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POWI: 10.

0% to $79. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TAOP or LIQT or POWI or CCSI?

In this comparison, POWI (1.

2% yield) pays a dividend. TAOP, LIQT, CCSI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TAOP or LIQT or POWI or CCSI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, LiqTech International, Inc.

(LIQT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54)). Taoping Inc. (TAOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIQT: -91. 0%, TAOP: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TAOP and LIQT and POWI and CCSI?

These companies operate in different sectors (TAOP (Technology) and LIQT (Industrials) and POWI (Technology) and CCSI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TAOP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LIQT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CCSI is a small-cap deep-value stock. POWI pays a dividend while TAOP, LIQT, CCSI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TAOP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LIQT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

POWI

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 32%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CCSI

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TAOP and LIQT and POWI and CCSI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TAOP: -2.6% · LIQT: 53.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.