Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TARS vs MCK vs CAH vs HSIC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Distribution
Medical - Distribution
Medical - Distribution
TARS vs MCK vs CAH vs HSIC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Distribution | Medical - Distribution | Medical - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $2.72B | $92.15B | $43.59B | $8.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $535M | $403.43B | $250.55B | $13.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-48M | $4.76B | $1.56B | $398M |
| Gross Margin | 90.4% | 3.6% | 3.7% | 29.1% |
| Operating Margin | -9.5% | 1.5% | 0.9% | 5.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.3x | 17.9x | 13.3x |
| Total Debt | $94M | $7.39B | $9.35B | $3.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $184M | $5.69B | $3.87B | $156M |
TARS vs MCK vs CAH vs HSIC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tarsus Pharmaceutic… (TARS) | 100 | 312.9 | +212.9% |
| McKesson Corporation (MCK) | 100 | 510.1 | +410.1% |
| Cardinal Health, In… (CAH) | 100 | 404.5 | +304.5% |
| Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) | 100 | 110.9 | +10.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TARS vs MCK vs CAH vs HSIC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TARS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 146.7%, EPS growth 48.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 159.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 27.3%, current ratio 3.85x
- 146.7% revenue growth vs CAH's -1.9%
- +35.1% vs MCK's +4.6%
MCK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 348.1% 10Y total return vs TARS's 210.8%
- PEG 0.49 vs HSIC's 4.21
- 5.7% ROA vs TARS's -8.9%, ROIC 5.4% vs -23.4%
CAH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 20 yrs, beta 0.03, yield 1.1%
- Beta 0.03, yield 1.1%, current ratio 0.94x
- Beta 0.03 vs HSIC's 0.73
- 1.1% yield, 20-year raise streak, vs MCK's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
HSIC is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Lower P/E (13.3x vs 17.9x)
- 3.0% margin vs TARS's -9.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 146.7% revenue growth vs CAH's -1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.3x vs 17.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.0% margin vs TARS's -9.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.03 vs HSIC's 0.73 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 20-year raise streak, vs MCK's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.1% vs MCK's +4.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.7% ROA vs TARS's -8.9%, ROIC 5.4% vs -23.4% |
TARS vs MCK vs CAH vs HSIC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TARS vs MCK vs CAH vs HSIC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CAH leads in 2 of 6 categories
HSIC leads 1 • MCK leads 1 • TARS leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TARS and HSIC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCK is the larger business by revenue, generating $403.4B annually — 754.0x TARS's $535M. HSIC is the more profitable business, keeping 3.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TARS's -9.0%. On growth, TARS holds the edge at +106.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $535M | $403.4B | $250.5B | $13.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$49M | $6.8B | $3.2B | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$48M | $4.8B | $1.6B | $398M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$32M | $6.0B | $4.4B | $561M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.4% | +3.6% | +3.7% | +29.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.5% | +1.5% | +0.9% | +5.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | +1.2% | +0.6% | +3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.9% | +1.5% | +1.8% | +4.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.9% | +6.0% | +11.0% | +7.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +75.0% | +37.0% | -19.5% | +14.9% |
Valuation Metrics
HSIC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.6x trailing earnings, HSIC trades at a 26% valuation discount to MCK's 29.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MCK offers better value at 0.75x vs HSIC's 6.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $92.1B | $43.6B | $8.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $93.8B | $49.1B | $11.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -40.23x | 29.25x | 28.72x | 21.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.28x | 17.94x | 13.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.75x | — | 6.84x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.74x | 16.01x | 10.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.03x | 0.26x | 0.20x | 0.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.78x | — | — | 1.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.63x | 23.56x | 14.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MCK delivers a 3.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-14 for TARS. TARS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HSIC's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MCK scores 6/9 vs HSIC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.2% | +3.0% | — | +8.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.9% | +5.7% | +2.8% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -23.4% | +5.4% | +33.8% | +7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.6% | +30.5% | +19.2% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.27x | — | — | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$90M | $1.7B | $5.5B | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $184M | $5.7B | $3.9B | $156M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $94M | $7.4B | $9.3B | $3.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -18.76x | 33.79x | 6.38x | 4.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TARS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCK five years ago would be worth $38,689 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,746 for HSIC. Over the past 12 months, TARS leads with a +35.1% total return vs MCK's +4.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TARS at 60.1% vs HSIC's -4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.8% | -8.5% | -9.5% | -8.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.1% | +4.6% | +22.0% | +5.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +310.3% | +106.4% | +127.3% | -11.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.3% | +286.9% | +235.7% | -12.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +210.8% | +348.1% | +160.8% | +5.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +60.1% | +27.3% | +31.5% | -4.0% |
Risk & Volatility
CAH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAH is the less volatile stock with a 0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HSIC's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAH currently trades 79.3% from its 52-week high vs TARS's 75.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 0.04x | 0.03x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $85.25 | $999.00 | $233.60 | $89.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $38.51 | $637.00 | $137.75 | $61.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.0% | +75.3% | +79.3% | +79.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.5 | 16.2 | 33.2 | 39.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 495K | 757K | 1.7M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
CAH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TARS as "Buy", MCK as "Buy", CAH as "Buy", HSIC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 39.7% upside for TARS (target: $89) vs 22.6% for HSIC (target: $86). For income investors, CAH offers the higher dividend yield at 1.10% vs MCK's 0.36%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $89.33 | $1006.50 | $249.67 | $86.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 31 | 33 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 17 | 20 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.69 | $2.04 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.4% | +1.8% | +10.5% |
CAH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). HSIC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TARS vs MCK vs CAH vs HSIC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TARS or MCK or CAH or HSIC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TARS) is the stronger pick with 146. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH). Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) offers the better valuation at 21. 6x trailing P/E (13. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TARS) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TARS or MCK or CAH or HSIC?
On trailing P/E, Henry Schein, Inc.
(HSIC) is the cheapest at 21. 6x versus McKesson Corporation at 29. 2x. On forward P/E, Henry Schein, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: McKesson Corporation wins at 0. 49x versus Henry Schein, Inc. 's 4. 21x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TARS or MCK or CAH or HSIC?
Over the past 5 years, McKesson Corporation (MCK) delivered a total return of +286.
9%, compared to -12. 5% for Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCK returned +348. 1% versus HSIC's +5. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TARS or MCK or CAH or HSIC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cardinal Health, Inc.
(CAH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 03β versus Henry Schein, Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning HSIC is approximately 2059% more volatile than CAH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TARS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 77% for Henry Schein, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TARS or MCK or CAH or HSIC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TARS) is pulling ahead at 146. 7% versus -1. 9% for Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cardinal Health, Inc. grew EPS 87. 0% year-over-year, compared to 7. 2% for Henry Schein, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TARS leads at 159. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TARS or MCK or CAH or HSIC?
Henry Schein, Inc.
(HSIC) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 0% net margin versus -14. 7% for Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HSIC leads at 5. 7% versus -15. 7% for TARS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TARS leads at 93. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TARS or MCK or CAH or HSIC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 49x versus Henry Schein, Inc. 's 4. 21x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) trades at 13. 3x forward P/E versus 19. 3x for McKesson Corporation — 6. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TARS: 39. 7% to $89. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — TARS or MCK or CAH or HSIC?
In this comparison, CAH (1.
1% yield), MCK (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. TARS, HSIC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TARS or MCK or CAH or HSIC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cardinal Health, Inc.
(CAH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 03), 1. 1% yield, +160. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAH: +160. 8%, HSIC: +5. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TARS and MCK and CAH and HSIC?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TARS is a small-cap high-growth stock; MCK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CAH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HSIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CAH pays a dividend while TARS, MCK, HSIC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.