Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TATT vs GE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
TATT vs GE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $462M | $316.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $178M | $48.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $17M | $8.66B |
| Gross Margin | 24.8% | 34.8% |
| Operating Margin | 10.3% | 18.5% |
| Forward P/E | 24.2x | 40.0x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $20.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $51M | $12.39B |
TATT vs GE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TAT Technologies Lt… (TATT) | 100 | 947.3 | +847.3% |
| GE Aerospace (GE) | 100 | 925.2 | +825.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TATT vs GE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TATT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 17.0%, EPS growth 37.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.2%
- 424.6% 10Y total return vs GE's 121.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.72, Low D/E 10.0%, current ratio 4.89x
GE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.14, yield 0.4%
- Beta 1.14, yield 0.4%, current ratio 1.04x
- 18.5% revenue growth vs TATT's 17.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% revenue growth vs TATT's 17.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.2x vs 40.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs TATT's 9.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.14 vs TATT's 1.72 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.9% vs TATT's +12.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs GE's 6.8%, ROIC 10.3% vs 24.7% |
TATT vs GE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TATT vs GE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GE is the larger business by revenue, generating $48.4B annually — 271.6x TATT's $178M. GE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TATT's 9.4%. On growth, GE holds the edge at +24.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $178M | $48.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $24M | $9.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $17M | $8.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $7.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +34.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.3% | +18.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +17.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.4% | +24.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.1% | -1.1% |
Valuation Metrics
TATT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.0x trailing earnings, TATT trades at a 30% valuation discount to GE's 37.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TATT's 18.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GE's 32.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $462M | $316.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $429M | $324.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.00x | 37.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.21x | 40.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.24x | 32.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.60x | 6.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.48x | 17.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 115.04x | 43.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TATT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GE delivers a 45.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $11 for TATT. TATT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GE's 1.08x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.7% | +45.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.1% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | +24.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.6% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$34M | $8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $51M | $12.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $20.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 18.30x | 11.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TATT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TATT five years ago would be worth $68,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $46,249 for GE. Over the past 12 months, GE leads with a +44.9% total return vs TATT's +12.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TATT at 85.6% vs GE's 56.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.1% | -5.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.0% | +44.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +539.5% | +280.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +583.7% | +362.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +424.6% | +121.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +85.6% | +56.0% |
Risk & Volatility
GE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GE is the less volatile stock with a 1.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TATT's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GE currently trades 86.8% from its 52-week high vs TATT's 55.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.72x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $64.37 | $348.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.52 | $208.22 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.3% | +86.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.1 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 203K | 5.7M |
Analyst Outlook
GE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TATT as "Buy" and GE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.8% upside for TATT (target: $53) vs 27.6% for GE (target: $386). GE is the only dividend payer here at 0.45% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $53.00 | $386.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% |
GE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). TATT leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
TATT vs GE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TATT or GE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, GE Aerospace (GE) is the stronger pick with 18.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 17. 0% for TAT Technologies Ltd. (TATT). TAT Technologies Ltd. (TATT) offers the better valuation at 26. 0x trailing P/E (24. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TAT Technologies Ltd. (TATT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TATT or GE?
On trailing P/E, TAT Technologies Ltd.
(TATT) is the cheapest at 26. 0x versus GE Aerospace at 37. 1x. On forward P/E, TAT Technologies Ltd. is actually cheaper at 24. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TATT or GE?
Over the past 5 years, TAT Technologies Ltd.
(TATT) delivered a total return of +583. 7%, compared to +362. 5% for GE Aerospace (GE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TATT returned +424. 6% versus GE's +121. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TATT or GE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GE Aerospace (GE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
14β versus TAT Technologies Ltd. 's 1. 72β — meaning TATT is approximately 51% more volatile than GE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TAT Technologies Ltd. (TATT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 108% for GE Aerospace — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TATT or GE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), GE Aerospace (GE) is pulling ahead at 18.
5% versus 17. 0% for TAT Technologies Ltd. (TATT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TAT Technologies Ltd. grew EPS 37. 0% year-over-year, compared to 36. 2% for GE Aerospace. Over a 3-year CAGR, TATT leads at 28. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TATT or GE?
GE Aerospace (GE) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
0% net margin versus 9. 4% for TAT Technologies Ltd. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GE leads at 19. 1% versus 10. 3% for TATT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GE leads at 36. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TATT or GE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TAT Technologies Ltd.
(TATT) trades at 24. 2x forward P/E versus 40. 0x for GE Aerospace — 15. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TATT: 48. 8% to $53. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TATT or GE?
In this comparison, GE (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. TATT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TATT or GE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, GE Aerospace (GE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
14), +121. 0% 10Y return). TAT Technologies Ltd. (TATT) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GE: +121. 0%, TATT: +424. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TATT and GE?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.