TATT vs HAYW vs POOL vs DRS

For growth investors, TAT Technologies Ltd.

(TATT) is the stronger pick with 17. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 4% for Pool Corporation (POOL). Pool Corporation (POOL) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E (17. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TAT Technologies Ltd. (TATT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Pool Corporation (POOL) is the cheapest at 17.

6x versus Leonardo DRS, Inc. at 40. 2x. On forward P/E, Hayward Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Hayward Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 12x versus Pool Corporation's 4. 44x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, TAT Technologies Ltd.

(TATT) delivered a total return of +583. 7%, compared to -52. 3% for Pool Corporation (POOL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DRS returned +54. 1% versus HAYW's -13. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Leonardo DRS, Inc.

(DRS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus TAT Technologies Ltd. 's 1. 72β — meaning TATT is approximately 81% more volatile than DRS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 29% for Pool Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TAT Technologies Ltd.

(TATT) is pulling ahead at 17. 0% versus -0. 4% for Pool Corporation (POOL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TAT Technologies Ltd. grew EPS 37. 0% year-over-year, compared to -4. 0% for Pool Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TATT leads at 28. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Hayward Holdings, Inc.

(HAYW) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 5% net margin versus 7. 6% for Leonardo DRS, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HAYW leads at 21. 1% versus 9. 5% for DRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HAYW leads at 45. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 12x versus Pool Corporation's 4. 44x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) trades at 17. 2x forward P/E versus 33. 0x for Leonardo DRS, Inc. — 15. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TATT: 48. 8% to $53. 00.

In this comparison, POOL (2.

6% yield), DRS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. TATT, HAYW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Pool Corporation (POOL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

00), 2. 6% yield, +145. 0% 10Y return). TAT Technologies Ltd. (TATT) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (POOL: +145. 0%, TATT: +424. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TATT is a small-cap high-growth stock; HAYW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; POOL is a small-cap deep-value stock; DRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. POOL, DRS pay a dividend while TATT, HAYW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.