Discount Stores
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TBBB vs KR vs WMT vs VLGEA vs TGT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Grocery Stores
Specialty Retail
Grocery Stores
Discount Stores
TBBB vs KR vs WMT vs VLGEA vs TGT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Discount Stores | Grocery Stores | Specialty Retail | Grocery Stores | Discount Stores |
| Market Cap | $4.41B | $41.54B | $1.04T | $659M | $57.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $77.56B | $147.64B | $703.06B | $2.39B | $106.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2.81B | $1.02B | $22.91B | $57M | $4.04B |
| Gross Margin | 16.2% | 22.3% | 24.9% | 28.0% | 27.3% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 1.3% | 4.1% | 3.0% | 5.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.5x | 44.8x | 11.7x | 15.7x |
| Total Debt | $14.00B | $24.68B | $67.09B | $341M | $5.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.43B | $3.33B | $10.73B | $111M | $5.49B |
TBBB vs KR vs WMT vs VLGEA vs TGT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BBB Foods Inc. (TBBB) | 100 | 181.5 | +81.5% |
| The Kroger Co. (KR) | 100 | 132.3 | +32.3% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 222.5 | +122.5% |
| Village Super Marke… (VLGEA) | 100 | 163.4 | +63.4% |
| Target Corporation (TGT) | 100 | 81.9 | -18.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TBBB vs KR vs WMT vs VLGEA vs TGT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TBBB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 27.6% revenue growth vs TGT's -1.7%
Among these 5 stocks, KR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
WMT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs VLGEA's 114.9%
- +35.1% vs KR's -6.7%
- 7.9% ROA vs TBBB's -10.5%, ROIC 14.7% vs -2.8%
VLGEA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.09, Low D/E 69.2%, current ratio 1.13x
- PEG 0.68 vs WMT's 4.07
- Beta 0.09, yield 2.0%, current ratio 1.13x
- Lower P/E (11.7x vs 15.7x)
TGT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 3.6%
- 3.8% margin vs TBBB's -3.6%
- 3.6% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.6% revenue growth vs TGT's -1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 15.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.8% margin vs TBBB's -3.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.09 vs TGT's 0.94 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.1% vs KR's -6.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs TBBB's -10.5%, ROIC 14.7% vs -2.8% |
TBBB vs KR vs WMT vs VLGEA vs TGT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TBBB vs KR vs WMT vs VLGEA vs TGT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TGT leads in 2 of 6 categories
KR leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • TBBB leads 0 • VLGEA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 294.6x VLGEA's $2.4B. TGT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TBBB's -3.6%. On growth, TBBB holds the edge at +32.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $77.6B | $147.6B | $703.1B | $2.4B | $106.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $5.5B | $42.8B | $108M | $8.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2.8B | $1.0B | $22.9B | $57M | $4.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | $3.5B | $15.3B | $62M | $2.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +22.3% | +24.9% | +28.0% | +27.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +1.3% | +4.1% | +3.0% | +5.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +0.7% | +3.3% | +2.4% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +2.4% | +2.2% | +2.6% | +2.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.3% | +1.2% | +5.8% | +6.9% | +3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.9% | +50.0% | +35.1% | +6.1% | +23.7% |
Valuation Metrics
KR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, VLGEA trades at a 76% valuation discount to WMT's 47.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VLGEA offers better value at 0.68x vs WMT's 4.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.4B | $41.5B | $1.04T | $659M | $57.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.1B | $62.9B | $1.10T | $889M | $57.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -28.33x | 42.62x | 47.76x | 11.70x | 15.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.53x | 44.77x | — | 15.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.34x | 0.68x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 71.45x | 10.82x | 24.88x | 8.17x | 7.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.04x | 0.28x | 1.46x | 0.28x | 0.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 18.32x | 7.24x | 10.47x | 1.34x | 3.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 67.32x | 12.40x | 25.00x | 19.13x | 20.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TGT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGT delivers a 26.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $-67 for TBBB. TGT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KR's 4.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs TBBB's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -67.2% | +13.0% | +22.3% | +11.4% | +26.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.5% | +2.0% | +7.9% | +5.6% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.8% | +5.0% | +14.7% | +7.6% | +16.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.1% | +5.5% | +17.5% | +8.8% | +13.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.39x | 4.16x | 0.67x | 0.69x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12.6B | $21.3B | $56.4B | $230M | $104M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.4B | $3.3B | $10.7B | $111M | $5.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14.0B | $24.7B | $67.1B | $341M | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.43x | 2.59x | 11.85x | 15.89x | 12.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,660 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,828 for TGT. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +35.1% total return vs KR's -6.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.7% vs TGT's -4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.8% | +4.8% | +16.1% | +29.5% | +25.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.9% | -6.7% | +35.1% | +26.5% | +33.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.9% | +41.2% | +161.3% | +125.7% | -11.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.9% | +83.2% | +186.6% | +95.7% | -31.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.9% | +106.5% | +501.4% | +114.9% | +98.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.0% | +12.2% | +37.7% | +31.2% | -4.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KR and VLGEA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KR is the less volatile stock with a -0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGT's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VLGEA currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs KR's 85.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | -0.65x | 0.11x | 0.09x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.09 | $76.58 | $134.69 | $45.12 | $133.07 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.81 | $58.60 | $91.89 | $30.08 | $83.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +85.7% | +96.8% | +99.0% | +94.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.0 | 41.3 | 56.2 | 58.2 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 480K | 5.5M | 17.1M | 49K | 4.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and TGT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TBBB as "Buy", KR as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", TGT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.5% upside for TBBB (target: $45) vs -7.8% for TGT (target: $115). For income investors, TGT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.60% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.75 | $74.75 | $137.22 | — | $115.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 44 | 64 | — | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.1% | +0.7% | +2.0% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 21 | 37 | 0 | 22 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.35 | $0.94 | $0.90 | $4.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.5% | +0.8% | 0.0% | +0.7% |
TGT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TBBB vs KR vs WMT vs VLGEA vs TGT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TBBB or KR or WMT or VLGEA or TGT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BBB Foods Inc.
(TBBB) is the stronger pick with 27. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). Village Super Market, Inc. (VLGEA) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BBB Foods Inc. (TBBB) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TBBB or KR or WMT or VLGEA or TGT?
On trailing P/E, Village Super Market, Inc.
(VLGEA) is the cheapest at 11. 7x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 8x. On forward P/E, The Kroger Co. is actually cheaper at 12. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TBBB or KR or WMT or VLGEA or TGT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 6%, compared to -31. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +501. 4% versus TGT's +98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TBBB or KR or WMT or VLGEA or TGT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 65β versus Target Corporation's 0. 94β — meaning TGT is approximately -244% more volatile than KR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Target Corporation (TGT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 4% for The Kroger Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TBBB or KR or WMT or VLGEA or TGT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BBB Foods Inc.
(TBBB) is pulling ahead at 27. 6% versus -1. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1067. 9% for BBB Foods Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TBBB leads at 32. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TBBB or KR or WMT or VLGEA or TGT?
Target Corporation (TGT) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
5% net margin versus -3. 6% for BBB Foods Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGT leads at 4. 9% versus -0. 7% for TBBB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VLGEA leads at 28. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TBBB or KR or WMT or VLGEA or TGT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Kroger Co.
(KR) trades at 12. 5x forward P/E versus 44. 8x for Walmart Inc. — 32. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TBBB: 17. 5% to $44. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — TBBB or KR or WMT or VLGEA or TGT?
In this comparison, TGT (3.
6% yield), KR (2. 1% yield), VLGEA (2. 0% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. TBBB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TBBB or KR or WMT or VLGEA or TGT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 65), 2. 1% yield, +106. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KR: +106. 5%, TBBB: +99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TBBB and KR and WMT and VLGEA and TGT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TBBB is a small-cap high-growth stock; KR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; VLGEA is a small-cap deep-value stock; TGT is a mid-cap deep-value stock. KR, WMT, VLGEA, TGT pay a dividend while TBBB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.