Internet Content & Information
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
TBLA vs GOOG vs JPM vs META vs MGNI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Banks - Diversified
Internet Content & Information
Advertising Agencies
TBLA vs GOOG vs JPM vs META vs MGNI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Banks - Diversified | Internet Content & Information | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $1.30B | $4.33T | $896.00B | $1.44T | $2.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.95B | $422.57B | $280.33B | $214.96B | $723M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $110M | $160.21B | $57.05B | $70.59B | $159M |
| Gross Margin | 29.7% | 60.4% | 60.0% | 81.9% | 63.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.2% | 32.7% | 25.9% | 41.2% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.8x | 25.2x | 14.4x | 17.2x | 15.3x |
| Total Debt | $194M | $59.29B | $942.38B | $83.90B | $279M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $121M | $30.71B | $343.34B | $35.87B | $553M |
TBLA vs GOOG vs JPM vs META vs MGNI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taboola.com Ltd. (TBLA) | 100 | 45.8 | -54.2% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) | 100 | 285.8 | +185.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 206.2 | +106.2% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) | 100 | 163.1 | +63.1% |
| Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) | 100 | 48.0 | -52.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TBLA vs GOOG vs JPM vs META vs MGNI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TBLA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 187.7%, EPS growth 12.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 21.4%, current ratio 1.04x
- 187.7% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3%
- Lower P/E (10.8x vs 15.3x)
GOOG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 9.0% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- 37.9% margin vs TBLA's 5.6%
- +102.9% vs META's -17.9%
- 27.4% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 25.1% vs 4.5%
JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- PEG 0.81 vs META's 0.94
- Beta 0.94, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
- Beta 0.94 vs META's 1.45
META lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, MGNI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 187.7% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 15.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs TBLA's 5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs META's 1.45 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs GOOG's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +102.9% vs META's -17.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 25.1% vs 4.5% |
TBLA vs GOOG vs JPM vs META vs MGNI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TBLA vs GOOG vs JPM vs META vs MGNI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOG leads in 2 of 6 categories
JPM leads 2 • META leads 1 • TBLA leads 1 • MGNI leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
META leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOG is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 584.8x MGNI's $723M. GOOG is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TBLA's 5.6%. On growth, META holds the edge at +33.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $422.6B | $280.3B | $215.0B | $723M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $151M | $161.3B | $81.4B | $109.3B | $145M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $110M | $160.2B | $57.0B | $70.6B | $159M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $218M | $73.3B | $100.9B | $48.3B | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +60.4% | +60.0% | +81.9% | +63.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +32.7% | +25.9% | +41.2% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +37.9% | +20.4% | +32.8% | +22.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +17.3% | +36.0% | +22.4% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.1% | +21.8% | — | +33.1% | +5.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.7% | +81.9% | +16.0% | +62.4% | +142.9% |
Valuation Metrics
TBLA leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 56% valuation discount to TBLA's 36.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs META's 1.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $4.33T | $896.0B | $1.44T | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $4.36T | $1.50T | $1.48T | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 36.46x | 33.13x | 16.00x | 24.14x | 17.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.81x | 25.19x | 14.40x | 17.23x | 15.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.11x | 0.90x | 1.31x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.51x | 29.02x | 18.36x | 14.57x | 13.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.68x | 10.75x | 3.20x | 7.15x | 3.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.67x | 10.55x | 2.47x | 6.72x | 2.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.93x | 59.14x | 8.88x | 31.16x | 14.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOG delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $12 for TBLA. GOOG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOG scores 7/9 vs META's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.9% | +39.0% | +15.9% | +33.2% | +18.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.1% | +27.4% | +1.3% | +20.8% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +25.1% | +4.5% | +27.6% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.8% | +30.3% | +8.9% | +29.4% | +7.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.14x | 2.60x | 0.39x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $73M | $28.6B | $599.0B | $48.0B | -$275M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $121M | $30.7B | $343.3B | $35.9B | $553M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $194M | $59.3B | $942.4B | $83.9B | $279M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.05x | 392.15x | 0.74x | 78.84x | 4.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOG five years ago would be worth $28,494 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,580 for TBLA. Over the past 12 months, GOOG leads with a +102.9% total return vs META's -17.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOG at 42.5% vs MGNI's 6.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.0% | +13.7% | -0.5% | -12.7% | +1.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.1% | +102.9% | +21.8% | -17.9% | -7.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.5% | +189.5% | +138.2% | +110.9% | +22.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.2% | +184.9% | +118.2% | +69.7% | -48.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.2% | +902.3% | +465.8% | +401.6% | +17.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.6% | +42.5% | +33.6% | +28.2% | +6.9% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than META's 1.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs MGNI's 61.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.29x | 0.94x | 1.45x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.26 | $404.44 | $337.25 | $796.25 | $26.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.84 | $163.33 | $262.71 | $520.26 | $10.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.1% | +88.6% | +95.1% | +71.2% | +61.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 42.1 | 59.1 | 35.0 | 68.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 18.8M | 7.0M | 15.7M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TBLA as "Buy", GOOG as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", META as "Buy", MGNI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.7% upside for META (target: $826) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs GOOG's 0.23%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.55 | $400.72 | $339.75 | $826.11 | $19.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 79 | 61 | 60 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | +1.9% | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 15 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.82 | $5.95 | $2.07 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% | +3.9% | +1.8% | +2.0% |
GOOG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). JPM leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).
TBLA vs GOOG vs JPM vs META vs MGNI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TBLA or GOOG or JPM or META or MGNI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Taboola.
com Ltd. (TBLA) is the stronger pick with 187. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Taboola. com Ltd. (TBLA) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TBLA or GOOG or JPM or META or MGNI?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Taboola. com Ltd. at 36. 5x. On forward P/E, Taboola. com Ltd. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Meta Platforms, Inc. 's 0. 94x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TBLA or GOOG or JPM or META or MGNI?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOG) delivered a total return of +184. 9%, compared to -54. 2% for Taboola. com Ltd. (TBLA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOG returned +902. 3% versus TBLA's -54. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TBLA or GOOG or JPM or META or MGNI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Meta Platforms, Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning META is approximately 54% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TBLA or GOOG or JPM or META or MGNI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Taboola.
com Ltd. (TBLA) is pulling ahead at 187. 7% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Taboola. com Ltd. grew EPS 1293% year-over-year, compared to -1. 6% for Meta Platforms, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, META leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TBLA or GOOG or JPM or META or MGNI?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOG) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus 2. 2% for Taboola. com Ltd. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: META leads at 41. 4% versus 2. 3% for TBLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — META leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TBLA or GOOG or JPM or META or MGNI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Meta Platforms, Inc. 's 0. 94x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Taboola. com Ltd. (TBLA) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 25. 2x for Alphabet Inc. — 14. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for META: 45. 7% to $826. 11.
08Which pays a better dividend — TBLA or GOOG or JPM or META or MGNI?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield), META (0. 4% yield), GOOG (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. TBLA, MGNI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TBLA or GOOG or JPM or META or MGNI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, MGNI: +17. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TBLA and GOOG and JPM and META and MGNI?
These companies operate in different sectors (TBLA (Communication Services) and GOOG (Communication Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and META (Communication Services) and MGNI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TBLA is a small-cap high-growth stock; GOOG is a mega-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; META is a mega-cap high-growth stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while TBLA, GOOG, META, MGNI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.