Internet Content & Information
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
TBLA vs GOOG vs META vs MGNI vs PUBM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Advertising Agencies
Software - Application
TBLA vs GOOG vs META vs MGNI vs PUBM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Advertising Agencies | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.30B | $4.33T | $1.44T | $2.33B | $530M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.95B | $422.57B | $214.96B | $723M | $282M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $110M | $160.21B | $70.59B | $159M | $-17M |
| Gross Margin | 29.7% | 60.4% | 81.9% | 63.4% | 63.2% |
| Operating Margin | 2.2% | 32.7% | 41.2% | 14.8% | -7.2% |
| Forward P/E | 10.8x | 25.2x | 17.2x | 15.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $194M | $59.29B | $83.90B | $279M | $44M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $121M | $30.71B | $35.87B | $553M | $146M |
TBLA vs GOOG vs META vs MGNI vs PUBM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taboola.com Ltd. (TBLA) | 100 | 45.8 | -54.2% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) | 100 | 285.8 | +185.8% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) | 100 | 163.1 | +63.1% |
| Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) | 100 | 48.0 | -52.0% |
| PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM) | 100 | 29.1 | -70.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TBLA vs GOOG vs META vs MGNI vs PUBM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TBLA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 187.7%, EPS growth 12.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.9%
- 187.7% revenue growth vs PUBM's -2.9%
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 1.00 vs PUBM's 1.50
GOOG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.29, yield 0.2%
- 9.0% 10Y total return vs META's 401.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.29, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
- PEG 0.84 vs META's 0.94
META ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 1.45, yield 0.4%, current ratio 2.60x
- 0.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GOOG's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
MGNI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, PUBM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 187.7% revenue growth vs PUBM's -2.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs PUBM's -6.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs PUBM's 1.50 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GOOG's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +102.9% vs META's -17.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs PUBM's -2.6%, ROIC 25.1% vs -6.8% |
TBLA vs GOOG vs META vs MGNI vs PUBM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TBLA vs GOOG vs META vs MGNI vs PUBM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
META leads in 2 of 6 categories
TBLA leads 2 • GOOG leads 2 • MGNI leads 0 • PUBM leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
META leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOG is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 1500.2x PUBM's $282M. GOOG is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PUBM's -6.2%. On growth, META holds the edge at +33.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $422.6B | $215.0B | $723M | $282M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $151M | $161.3B | $109.3B | $145M | $22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $110M | $160.2B | $70.6B | $159M | -$17M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $218M | $73.3B | $48.3B | $44M | $43M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +60.4% | +81.9% | +63.4% | +63.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +32.7% | +41.2% | +14.8% | -7.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +37.9% | +32.8% | +22.0% | -6.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +17.3% | +22.4% | +6.1% | +15.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.1% | +21.8% | +33.1% | +5.5% | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.7% | +81.9% | +62.4% | +142.9% | -35.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TBLA leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, MGNI trades at a 53% valuation discount to TBLA's 36.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOG offers better value at 1.11x vs META's 1.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $4.33T | $1.44T | $2.3B | $530M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $4.36T | $1.48T | $2.1B | $428M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 36.46x | 33.13x | 24.14x | 17.11x | -36.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.81x | 25.19x | 17.23x | 15.28x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.11x | 1.31x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.51x | 29.02x | 14.57x | 13.55x | 16.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.68x | 10.75x | 7.15x | 3.26x | 1.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.67x | 10.55x | 6.72x | 2.71x | 2.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.93x | 59.14x | 31.16x | 14.05x | 7.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOG delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PUBM. GOOG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to META's 0.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOG scores 7/9 vs PUBM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.9% | +39.0% | +33.2% | +18.6% | -7.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.1% | +27.4% | +20.8% | +5.3% | -2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +25.1% | +27.6% | +9.5% | -6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.8% | +30.3% | +29.4% | +7.3% | -5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.14x | 0.39x | 0.30x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $73M | $28.6B | $48.0B | -$275M | -$102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $121M | $30.7B | $35.9B | $553M | $146M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $194M | $59.3B | $83.9B | $279M | $44M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.05x | 392.15x | 78.84x | 4.03x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOG five years ago would be worth $28,494 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,221 for PUBM. Over the past 12 months, GOOG leads with a +102.9% total return vs META's -17.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOG at 42.5% vs PUBM's -15.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.0% | +13.7% | -12.7% | +1.2% | +32.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.1% | +102.9% | -17.9% | -7.8% | +1.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.5% | +189.5% | +110.9% | +22.1% | -39.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.2% | +184.9% | +69.7% | -48.9% | -67.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.2% | +902.3% | +401.6% | +17.3% | -61.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.6% | +42.5% | +28.2% | +6.9% | -15.3% |
Risk & Volatility
TBLA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TBLA is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PUBM's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TBLA currently trades 90.1% from its 52-week high vs MGNI's 61.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.29x | 1.45x | 1.39x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.26 | $404.44 | $796.25 | $26.65 | $13.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.84 | $163.33 | $520.26 | $10.82 | $6.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.1% | +88.6% | +71.2% | +61.0% | +81.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 42.1 | 35.0 | 68.4 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 18.8M | 15.7M | 2.4M | 673K |
Analyst Outlook
META leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TBLA as "Buy", GOOG as "Buy", META as "Buy", MGNI as "Buy", PUBM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.7% upside for META (target: $826) vs 11.9% for GOOG (target: $401). For income investors, META offers the higher dividend yield at 0.36% vs GOOG's 0.23%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.55 | $400.72 | $826.11 | $19.25 | $13.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 79 | 60 | 31 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | +0.4% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 2 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.82 | $2.07 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% | +1.8% | +2.0% | +8.8% |
META leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). TBLA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
TBLA vs GOOG vs META vs MGNI vs PUBM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TBLA or GOOG or META or MGNI or PUBM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Taboola.
com Ltd. (TBLA) is the stronger pick with 187. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Taboola. com Ltd. (TBLA) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TBLA or GOOG or META or MGNI or PUBM?
On trailing P/E, Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus Taboola. com Ltd. at 36. 5x. On forward P/E, Taboola. com Ltd. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 84x versus Meta Platforms, Inc. 's 0. 94x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TBLA or GOOG or META or MGNI or PUBM?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOG) delivered a total return of +184. 9%, compared to -67. 8% for PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOG returned +902. 3% versus PUBM's -61. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TBLA or GOOG or META or MGNI or PUBM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Taboola.
com Ltd. (TBLA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus PubMatic, Inc. 's 1. 50β — meaning PUBM is approximately 50% more volatile than TBLA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 39% for Meta Platforms, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TBLA or GOOG or META or MGNI or PUBM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Taboola.
com Ltd. (TBLA) is pulling ahead at 187. 7% versus -2. 9% for PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Taboola. com Ltd. grew EPS 1293% year-over-year, compared to -234. 8% for PubMatic, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, META leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TBLA or GOOG or META or MGNI or PUBM?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOG) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -5. 1% for PubMatic, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: META leads at 41. 4% versus -6. 1% for PUBM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — META leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TBLA or GOOG or META or MGNI or PUBM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 84x versus Meta Platforms, Inc. 's 0. 94x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Taboola. com Ltd. (TBLA) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 25. 2x for Alphabet Inc. — 14. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for META: 45. 7% to $826. 11.
08Which pays a better dividend — TBLA or GOOG or META or MGNI or PUBM?
In this comparison, META (0.
4% yield), GOOG (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. TBLA, MGNI, PUBM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TBLA or GOOG or META or MGNI or PUBM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 29), +902. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOG: +902. 3%, PUBM: -61. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TBLA and GOOG and META and MGNI and PUBM?
These companies operate in different sectors (TBLA (Communication Services) and GOOG (Communication Services) and META (Communication Services) and MGNI (Communication Services) and PUBM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TBLA is a small-cap high-growth stock; GOOG is a mega-cap high-growth stock; META is a mega-cap high-growth stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock; PUBM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.