Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TBN vs BATL vs CIVI vs VTLE vs HAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
TBN vs BATL vs CIVI vs VTLE vs HAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $753M | $48M | $2.34B | $693M | $33.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $54K | $165M | $4.71B | $1.90B | $22.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-32M | $12M | $638M | $-1.31B | $1.54B |
| Gross Margin | -10.5% | 72.8% | 43.9% | 44.2% | 15.3% |
| Operating Margin | -617.2% | -4.0% | 31.1% | -58.3% | 11.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.6x | 6.8x | 4.0x | 17.1x |
| Total Debt | $26M | $23M | $4.49B | $2.55B | $8.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $28M | $76M | $40M | $2.21B |
TBN vs BATL vs CIVI vs VTLE vs HAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tamboran Resources … (TBN) | 100 | 158.4 | +58.4% |
| Battalion Oil Corpo… (BATL) | 100 | 86.5 | -13.5% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 39.3 | -60.7% |
| Vital Energy, Inc. (VTLE) | 100 | 40.0 | -60.0% |
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 117.9 | +17.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TBN vs BATL vs CIVI vs VTLE vs HAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TBN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 63.9% 10Y total return vs HAL's 18.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 6.8%, current ratio 1.55x
- Beta 0.05 vs VTLE's 1.23, lower leverage
BATL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta -1.92, yield 100.0%
- 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs HAL's 1.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +120.6% vs CIVI's +5.5%
CIVI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- 49.8% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9%
- 13.6% margin vs TBN's -585.8%
VTLE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 17.1x)
HAL is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.48, yield 1.7%, current ratio 2.04x
- 6.1% ROA vs VTLE's -27.9%, ROIC 10.2% vs -0.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 17.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.6% margin vs TBN's -585.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs VTLE's 1.23, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs HAL's 1.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +120.6% vs CIVI's +5.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs VTLE's -27.9%, ROIC 10.2% vs -0.3% |
TBN vs BATL vs CIVI vs VTLE vs HAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TBN vs BATL vs CIVI vs VTLE vs HAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VTLE leads in 1 of 6 categories
HAL leads 1 • TBN leads 1 • BATL leads 1 • CIVI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CIVI and HAL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $22.2B annually — 410537.0x TBN's $54,000. CIVI is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TBN's -585.8%. On growth, HAL holds the edge at -0.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $54,000 | $165M | $4.7B | $1.9B | $22.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$33M | $74M | $3.4B | -$334M | $3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | $12M | $638M | -$1.3B | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$96M | $39M | $934M | $656M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -10.5% | +72.8% | +43.9% | +44.2% | +15.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -617.2% | -4.0% | +31.1% | -58.3% | +11.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -585.8% | +7.2% | +13.6% | -69.3% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1786.7% | +23.7% | +19.8% | +34.6% | +7.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -37.0% | -8.1% | -8.4% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +59.0% | -33.9% | -2.6% | +129.2% |
Valuation Metrics
VTLE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 88% valuation discount to HAL's 26.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CIVI's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HAL's 11.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $753M | $48M | $2.3B | $693M | $33.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $740M | $43M | $6.8B | $3.2B | $39.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -1.29x | 3.24x | -3.78x | 26.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.57x | 6.75x | 3.98x | 17.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.15x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 1.89x | 4.46x | 11.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.29x | 0.45x | 0.36x | 1.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.34x | — | 0.41x | 0.24x | 3.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1.22x | 2.61x | — | 19.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HAL leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HAL delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-75 for VTLE. TBN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VTLE's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BATL scores 8/9 vs TBN's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.4% | +14.5% | +9.5% | -74.8% | +14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | +2.4% | +4.2% | -27.9% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.2% | -3.4% | +10.8% | -0.3% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.5% | -1.8% | +12.1% | -0.5% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | — | 0.68x | 0.95x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13M | -$5M | $4.4B | $2.5B | $5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $28M | $76M | $40M | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26M | $23M | $4.5B | $2.6B | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -48.11x | 0.57x | 2.80x | -5.04x | 9.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TBN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HAL five years ago would be worth $18,740 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,254 for BATL. Over the past 12 months, BATL leads with a +120.6% total return vs CIVI's +5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TBN at 17.9% vs VTLE's -25.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.8% | +142.9% | -1.5% | — | +35.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +69.7% | +120.6% | +5.5% | +14.6% | +100.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.9% | -53.8% | -41.7% | -59.0% | +39.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.9% | -77.5% | +23.5% | -55.5% | +87.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.9% | -71.8% | -86.2% | -92.1% | +18.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.9% | -22.7% | -16.5% | -25.7% | +11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BATL and HAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BATL is the less volatile stock with a -1.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VTLE's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HAL currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs BATL's 9.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.05x | -1.92x | 1.06x | 1.23x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $52.21 | $29.70 | $37.45 | $22.10 | $42.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.29 | $1.00 | $25.38 | $13.79 | $19.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.3% | +9.7% | +73.1% | +81.1% | +93.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.1 | 37.1 | 54.8 | 53.2 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 182K | 16.6M | 22.4M | 17 | 14.9M |
Analyst Outlook
BATL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TBN as "Buy", BATL as "Buy", CIVI as "Hold", VTLE as "Hold", HAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.3% upside for VTLE (target: $23) vs -0.5% for HAL (target: $40). For income investors, BATL offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs HAL's 1.73%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.00 | — | $31.00 | $23.00 | $39.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 2 | 16 | 36 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +100.0% | +18.2% | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 | 0 | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.96 | $4.98 | — | $0.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +18.3% | +0.5% | +3.0% |
VTLE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). HAL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
TBN vs BATL vs CIVI vs VTLE vs HAL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TBN or BATL or CIVI or VTLE or HAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tamboran Resources Corp (TBN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TBN or BATL or CIVI or VTLE or HAL?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Halliburton Company at 26. 6x. On forward P/E, Vital Energy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TBN or BATL or CIVI or VTLE or HAL?
Over the past 5 years, Halliburton Company (HAL) delivered a total return of +87.
4%, compared to -77. 5% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TBN returned +63. 9% versus VTLE's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TBN or BATL or CIVI or VTLE or HAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the lower-risk stock at -1.
92β versus Vital Energy, Inc. 's 1. 23β — meaning VTLE is approximately -164% more volatile than BATL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tamboran Resources Corp (TBN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 95% for Vital Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TBN or BATL or CIVI or VTLE or HAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Battalion Oil Corporation grew EPS 42. 6% year-over-year, compared to -144650. 7% for Tamboran Resources Corp. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TBN or BATL or CIVI or VTLE or HAL?
Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus -585. 8% for Tamboran Resources Corp — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIVI leads at 29. 0% versus -617. 2% for TBN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BATL leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TBN or BATL or CIVI or VTLE or HAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Vital Energy, Inc.
(VTLE) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for Halliburton Company — 13. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VTLE: 28. 3% to $23. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TBN or BATL or CIVI or VTLE or HAL?
In this comparison, BATL (100.
0% yield), CIVI (18. 2% yield), HAL (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. TBN, VTLE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TBN or BATL or CIVI or VTLE or HAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1.
92), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BATL: -71. 8%, VTLE: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TBN and BATL and CIVI and VTLE and HAL?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TBN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BATL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; VTLE is a small-cap high-growth stock; HAL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BATL, CIVI, HAL pay a dividend while TBN, VTLE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.