Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TBN vs VTLE vs CIVI vs BATL vs RRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
TBN vs VTLE vs CIVI vs BATL vs RRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $750M | $693M | $2.34B | $47M | $9.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $54K | $1.90B | $4.71B | $165M | $3.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-32M | $-1.31B | $638M | $12M | $903M |
| Gross Margin | -10.5% | 44.2% | 43.9% | 72.8% | 42.2% |
| Operating Margin | -617.2% | -58.3% | 31.1% | -4.0% | 30.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.0x | 6.8x | 12.4x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $26M | $2.55B | $4.49B | $23M | $1.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $40M | $76M | $28M | $204K |
TBN vs VTLE vs CIVI vs BATL vs RRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tamboran Resources … (TBN) | 100 | 157.8 | +57.8% |
| Vital Energy, Inc. (VTLE) | 100 | 40.0 | -60.0% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 39.3 | -60.7% |
| Battalion Oil Corpo… (BATL) | 100 | 85.6 | -14.4% |
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | 100 | 121.8 | +21.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TBN vs VTLE vs CIVI vs BATL vs RRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TBN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 63.2% 10Y total return vs RRC's 1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.11, Low D/E 6.8%, current ratio 1.55x
- Beta 0.11, current ratio 1.55x
- Beta 0.11 vs VTLE's 1.32, lower leverage
VTLE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 9.6x)
CIVI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- 49.8% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9%
BATL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta -1.71, yield 100.0%
- 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CIVI's 18.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +128.8% vs CIVI's +6.8%
RRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 28.4% margin vs TBN's -585.8%
- 12.4% ROA vs VTLE's -27.9%, ROIC 11.4% vs -0.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 9.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.4% margin vs TBN's -585.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs VTLE's 1.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CIVI's 18.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +128.8% vs CIVI's +6.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs VTLE's -27.9%, ROIC 11.4% vs -0.3% |
TBN vs VTLE vs CIVI vs BATL vs RRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TBN vs VTLE vs CIVI vs BATL vs RRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RRC leads in 3 of 6 categories
VTLE leads 1 • BATL leads 1 • TBN leads 0 • CIVI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RRC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 87143.4x TBN's $54,000. RRC is the more profitable business, keeping 28.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TBN's -585.8%. On growth, RRC holds the edge at +22.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $54,000 | $1.9B | $4.7B | $165M | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$33M | -$334M | $3.4B | $74M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | -$1.3B | $638M | $12M | $903M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$96M | $656M | $934M | $39M | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -10.5% | +44.2% | +43.9% | +72.8% | +42.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -617.2% | -58.3% | +31.1% | -4.0% | +30.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -585.8% | -69.3% | +13.6% | +7.2% | +28.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1786.7% | +34.6% | +19.8% | +23.7% | +40.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -8.4% | -8.1% | -37.0% | +22.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.6% | -33.9% | +59.0% | +2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
VTLE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 78% valuation discount to RRC's 14.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CIVI's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RRC's 8.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $750M | $693M | $2.3B | $47M | $9.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $737M | $3.2B | $6.8B | $42M | $10.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -3.78x | 3.24x | -1.28x | 14.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 3.98x | 6.75x | 12.43x | 9.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.15x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.46x | 1.89x | — | 8.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.36x | 0.45x | 0.29x | 3.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.34x | 0.24x | 0.41x | — | 2.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 2.61x | 1.20x | 16.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RRC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RRC delivers a 20.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-75 for VTLE. TBN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VTLE's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RRC scores 9/9 vs TBN's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.4% | -74.8% | +9.5% | +14.5% | +20.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | -27.9% | +4.2% | +2.4% | +12.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.2% | -0.3% | +10.8% | -3.4% | +11.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.5% | -0.5% | +12.1% | -1.8% | +13.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.95x | 0.68x | — | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13M | $2.5B | $4.4B | -$5M | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $40M | $76M | $28M | $204,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26M | $2.6B | $4.5B | $23M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -48.11x | -5.04x | 2.80x | 0.57x | 12.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RRC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RRC five years ago would be worth $36,939 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,252 for BATL. Over the past 12 months, BATL leads with a +128.8% total return vs CIVI's +6.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RRC at 18.0% vs VTLE's -25.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.3% | — | -1.5% | +140.3% | +16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +75.2% | +28.7% | +6.8% | +128.8% | +15.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.2% | -59.0% | -41.7% | -54.3% | +64.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.2% | -51.9% | +31.9% | -77.5% | +269.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.2% | -92.1% | -86.2% | -72.1% | +1.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.7% | -25.7% | -16.5% | -23.0% | +18.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BATL and RRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BATL is the less volatile stock with a -1.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VTLE's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RRC currently trades 84.6% from its 52-week high vs BATL's 9.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.11x | 1.32x | 1.10x | -1.71x | 0.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $52.21 | $22.10 | $37.45 | $29.70 | $48.31 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.29 | $13.65 | $25.38 | $1.00 | $32.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.0% | +81.1% | +73.1% | +9.6% | +84.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.9 | 53.2 | 54.8 | 37.6 | 41.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 179K | 17 | 22.4M | 16.6M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
BATL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TBN as "Buy", VTLE as "Hold", CIVI as "Hold", BATL as "Buy", RRC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.3% upside for VTLE (target: $23) vs 13.2% for CIVI (target: $31). For income investors, BATL offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs RRC's 0.87%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.00 | $23.00 | $31.00 | — | $46.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 36 | 16 | 2 | 62 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +18.2% | +100.0% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $4.98 | $2.96 | $0.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | +18.3% | 0.0% | +2.4% |
RRC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VTLE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TBN vs VTLE vs CIVI vs BATL vs RRC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TBN or VTLE or CIVI or BATL or RRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tamboran Resources Corp (TBN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TBN or VTLE or CIVI or BATL or RRC?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Range Resources Corporation at 14. 9x. On forward P/E, Vital Energy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TBN or VTLE or CIVI or BATL or RRC?
Over the past 5 years, Range Resources Corporation (RRC) delivered a total return of +269.
4%, compared to -77. 5% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TBN returned +63. 2% versus VTLE's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TBN or VTLE or CIVI or BATL or RRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the lower-risk stock at -1.
71β versus Vital Energy, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning VTLE is approximately -177% more volatile than BATL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tamboran Resources Corp (TBN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 95% for Vital Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TBN or VTLE or CIVI or BATL or RRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Range Resources Corporation grew EPS 151. 4% year-over-year, compared to -144650. 7% for Tamboran Resources Corp. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TBN or VTLE or CIVI or BATL or RRC?
Range Resources Corporation (RRC) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus -585. 8% for Tamboran Resources Corp — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIVI leads at 29. 0% versus -617. 2% for TBN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BATL leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TBN or VTLE or CIVI or BATL or RRC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Vital Energy, Inc.
(VTLE) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 4x for Battalion Oil Corporation — 8. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VTLE: 28. 3% to $23. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TBN or VTLE or CIVI or BATL or RRC?
In this comparison, BATL (100.
0% yield), CIVI (18. 2% yield), RRC (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. TBN, VTLE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TBN or VTLE or CIVI or BATL or RRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1.
71), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BATL: -72. 1%, VTLE: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TBN and VTLE and CIVI and BATL and RRC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TBN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VTLE is a small-cap high-growth stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; BATL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RRC is a small-cap high-growth stock. CIVI, BATL, RRC pay a dividend while TBN, VTLE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.