Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TCI vs GOOD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Diversified
TCI vs GOOD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | REIT - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $314M | $599M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $49M | $166M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $21M |
| Gross Margin | -26.7% | -11.7% |
| Operating Margin | -12.9% | 27.9% |
| Forward P/E | 22.7x | 80.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $856M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $11M |
TCI vs GOOD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcontinental Re… (TCI) | 100 | 179.8 | +79.8% |
| Gladstone Commercia… (GOOD) | 100 | 69.1 | -30.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TCI vs GOOD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.75
- Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth 135.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.9%
- 310.9% 10Y total return vs GOOD's 49.8%
GOOD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, current ratio 1.63x
- Beta 0.55, yield 11.7%, current ratio 1.63x
- Beta 0.55 vs TCI's 0.75
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.6% FFO/revenue growth vs GOOD's 8.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.7x vs 80.8x), PEG 1.44 vs 2.28 | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.1% margin vs GOOD's 12.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs TCI's 0.75 | |
| Dividends | 11.7% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.5% vs GOOD's -3.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.7% ROA vs TCI's 1.2% |
TCI vs GOOD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TCI vs GOOD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TCI and GOOD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOD is the larger business by revenue, generating $166M annually — 3.4x TCI's $49M. TCI is the more profitable business, keeping 28.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GOOD's 12.7%. On growth, TCI holds the edge at +21.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $49M | $166M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6M | $106M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $21M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$56M | $90M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -26.7% | -11.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.9% | +27.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.1% | +12.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -114.0% | +54.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.4% | +11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +75.8% | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
GOOD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.7x trailing earnings, TCI trades at a 25% valuation discount to GOOD's 30.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOD offers better value at 0.85x vs TCI's 1.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $314M | $599M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $300M | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.70x | 30.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 80.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.44x | 0.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.70x | 12.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.40x | 3.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.36x | 1.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TCI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $2 for TCI. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TCI scores 5/9 vs GOOD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.6% | +9.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$14M | $846M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $11M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $856M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TCI and GOOD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TCI five years ago would be worth $17,221 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,994 for GOOD. Over the past 12 months, TCI leads with a +23.5% total return vs GOOD's -3.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOD at 12.1% vs TCI's 1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.3% | +18.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.5% | -3.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.7% | +40.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.2% | -10.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +310.9% | +49.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.2% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
GOOD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOOD is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TCI's 0.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOD currently trades 82.4% from its 52-week high vs TCI's 60.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.65 | $15.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.65 | $10.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.9% | +82.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.8 | 65.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 390K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
GOOD is the only dividend payer here at 11.66% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $13.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +11.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
GOOD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). TCI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
TCI vs GOOD: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TCI or GOOD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
(TCI) is the stronger pick with 9. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 0% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (TCI) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TCI or GOOD?
On trailing P/E, Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
(TCI) is the cheapest at 22. 7x versus Gladstone Commercial Corporation at 30. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TCI or GOOD?
Over the past 5 years, Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
(TCI) delivered a total return of +72. 2%, compared to -10. 1% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TCI returned +310. 9% versus GOOD's +49. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TCI or GOOD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
55β versus Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. 's 0. 75β — meaning TCI is approximately 36% more volatile than GOOD relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — TCI or GOOD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
(TCI) is pulling ahead at 9. 6% versus 8. 0% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. grew EPS 135. 3% year-over-year, compared to 57. 7% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TCI leads at 12. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TCI or GOOD?
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
(TCI) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 1% net margin versus 12. 0% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOD leads at 37. 2% versus -12. 9% for TCI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOOD leads at 5. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — TCI or GOOD?
In this comparison, GOOD (11.
7% yield) pays a dividend. TCI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is TCI or GOOD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
55), 11. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOD: +49. 8%, TCI: +310. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TCI and GOOD?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TCI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOOD is a small-cap income-oriented stock. GOOD pays a dividend while TCI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.