Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TCMD vs CNMD vs ATRC vs MMSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
TCMD vs CNMD vs ATRC vs MMSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $587M | $1.17B | $1.41B | $3.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $344M | $1.37B | $552M | $1.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20M | $55M | $-5M | $139M |
| Gross Margin | 75.7% | 53.6% | 75.5% | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | 9.4% | 11.3% | -0.4% | 12.2% |
| Forward P/E | 22.8x | 8.7x | 370.7x | 15.5x |
| Total Debt | $16M | $835M | $88M | $898M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $83M | $41M | $167M | $449M |
TCMD vs CNMD vs ATRC vs MMSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tactile Systems Tec… (TCMD) | 100 | 53.7 | -46.3% |
| CONMED Corporation (CNMD) | 100 | 51.9 | -48.1% |
| AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) | 100 | 58.1 | -41.9% |
| Merit Medical Syste… (MMSI) | 100 | 138.5 | +38.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TCMD vs CNMD vs ATRC vs MMSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TCMD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.99
- +169.8% vs MMSI's -33.8%
- 7.5% ROA vs ATRC's -0.7%, ROIC 13.8% vs -0.6%
CNMD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 15.5x)
- 2.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
ATRC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 74.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.4%
- 14.9% revenue growth vs CNMD's 5.2%
MMSI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 214.6% 10Y total return vs TCMD's 134.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 56.7%, current ratio 4.34x
- Beta 0.71, current ratio 4.34x
- 9.0% margin vs ATRC's -0.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.9% revenue growth vs CNMD's 5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 15.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.0% margin vs ATRC's -0.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs CNMD's 1.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +169.8% vs MMSI's -33.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs ATRC's -0.7%, ROIC 13.8% vs -0.6% |
TCMD vs CNMD vs ATRC vs MMSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TCMD vs CNMD vs ATRC vs MMSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CNMD leads in 2 of 6 categories
TCMD leads 2 • MMSI leads 1 • ATRC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 4.5x TCMD's $344M. MMSI is the more profitable business, keeping 9.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATRC's -0.8%. On growth, TCMD holds the edge at +22.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $344M | $1.4B | $552M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $39M | $219M | $13M | $290M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $20M | $55M | -$5M | $139M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $124M | $54M | $274M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.7% | +53.6% | +75.5% | +48.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +11.3% | -0.4% | +12.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +4.0% | -0.8% | +9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +9.0% | +9.7% | +17.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.8% | -0.7% | +14.3% | +7.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.5% | +136.8% | +101.6% | +38.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CNMD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.2x trailing earnings, CNMD trades at a 20% valuation discount to TCMD's 31.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CNMD's 10.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATRC's 77.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $587M | $1.2B | $1.4B | $3.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $519M | $2.0B | $1.3B | $4.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.72x | 25.22x | -115.83x | 29.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.82x | 8.71x | 370.67x | 15.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.69x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.45x | 10.17x | 77.75x | 13.06x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.78x | 0.85x | 2.63x | 2.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.77x | 1.15x | 2.70x | 2.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.51x | 7.78x | 29.15x | 17.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TCMD leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TCMD delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-1 for ATRC. TCMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNMD's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TCMD scores 8/9 vs ATRC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.7% | +5.4% | -1.0% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.5% | +2.4% | -0.7% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.8% | +5.8% | -0.6% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.9% | +7.0% | -0.6% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.81x | 0.18x | 0.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$67M | $794M | -$79M | $450M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $83M | $41M | $167M | $449M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $835M | $88M | $898M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 76.34x | 5.20x | 0.47x | 10.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TCMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MMSI five years ago would be worth $9,644 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,902 for CNMD. Over the past 12 months, TCMD leads with a +169.8% total return vs MMSI's -33.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TCMD at 11.5% vs CNMD's -31.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.1% | -6.0% | -29.2% | -27.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +169.8% | -31.3% | -8.3% | -33.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.8% | -67.3% | -41.8% | -26.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.5% | -71.0% | -64.2% | -3.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +134.7% | +6.6% | +95.1% | +214.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.5% | -31.1% | -16.5% | -9.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TCMD and MMSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MMSI is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNMD's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TCMD currently trades 68.9% from its 52-week high vs MMSI's 62.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 1.34x | 1.03x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.75 | $61.08 | $43.18 | $100.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.34 | $33.21 | $26.62 | $59.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.9% | +62.4% | +64.4% | +62.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.9 | 49.6 | 45.0 | 34.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 279K | 406K | 669K | 769K |
Analyst Outlook
CNMD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TCMD as "Buy", CNMD as "Hold", ATRC as "Buy", MMSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 104.8% upside for CNMD (target: $78) vs 49.0% for TCMD (target: $39). CNMD is the only dividend payer here at 2.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.75 | $78.00 | $50.67 | $95.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 21 | 19 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.79 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.5% | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% |
CNMD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). TCMD leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
TCMD vs CNMD vs ATRC vs MMSI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TCMD or CNMD or ATRC or MMSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AtriCure, Inc.
(ATRC) is the stronger pick with 14. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 2% for CONMED Corporation (CNMD). CONMED Corporation (CNMD) offers the better valuation at 25. 2x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. (TCMD) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TCMD or CNMD or ATRC or MMSI?
On trailing P/E, CONMED Corporation (CNMD) is the cheapest at 25.
2x versus Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. at 31. 7x. On forward P/E, CONMED Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TCMD or CNMD or ATRC or MMSI?
Over the past 5 years, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) delivered a total return of -3. 6%, compared to -71. 0% for CONMED Corporation (CNMD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MMSI returned +214. 6% versus CNMD's +6. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TCMD or CNMD or ATRC or MMSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus CONMED Corporation's 1. 34β — meaning CNMD is approximately 88% more volatile than MMSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. (TCMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 81% for CONMED Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TCMD or CNMD or ATRC or MMSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AtriCure, Inc.
(ATRC) is pulling ahead at 14. 9% versus 5. 2% for CONMED Corporation (CNMD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AtriCure, Inc. grew EPS 74. 7% year-over-year, compared to -64. 6% for CONMED Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATRC leads at 17. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TCMD or CNMD or ATRC or MMSI?
Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 5% net margin versus -2. 1% for AtriCure, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MMSI leads at 12. 2% versus -0. 6% for ATRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TCMD leads at 75. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TCMD or CNMD or ATRC or MMSI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CONMED Corporation (CNMD) trades at 8.
7x forward P/E versus 370. 7x for AtriCure, Inc. — 362. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNMD: 104. 8% to $78. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TCMD or CNMD or ATRC or MMSI?
In this comparison, CNMD (2.
1% yield) pays a dividend. TCMD, ATRC, MMSI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TCMD or CNMD or ATRC or MMSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +214. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MMSI: +214. 6%, ATRC: +95. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TCMD and CNMD and ATRC and MMSI?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CNMD pays a dividend while TCMD, ATRC, MMSI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.