Banks - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TD vs USB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
TD vs USB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $192.18B | $86.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $115.84B | $42.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14.91B | $7.58B |
| Gross Margin | 49.0% | 62.8% |
| Operating Margin | 20.7% | 22.2% |
| Forward P/E | 12.2x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $663.58B | $77.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $116.93B | $46.89B |
TD vs USB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Toronto-Dominio… (TD) | 100 | 255.0 | +155.0% |
| U.S. Bancorp (USB) | 100 | 150.6 | +50.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TD vs USB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 2.8%
- 209.4% 10Y total return vs USB's 68.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 0.12x
USB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 0.3%, EPS growth 21.6%
- NIM 2.4% vs TD's 1.6%
- 0.3% NII/revenue growth vs TD's -2.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.3% NII/revenue growth vs TD's -2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 12.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs USB's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs USB's 0.93 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +67.9% vs USB's +31.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs USB's 0.4% |
TD vs USB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TD vs USB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
USB leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TD is the larger business by revenue, generating $115.8B annually — 2.7x USB's $42.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 17.7% (TD) to 17.7% (USB).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $115.8B | $42.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $20.0B | $10.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14.9B | $7.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $13.0B | $5.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.0% | +62.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +22.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +17.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -62.0% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -61.2% | +24.8% |
Valuation Metrics
USB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.0x trailing earnings, USB trades at a 12% valuation discount to TD's 13.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TD offers better value at 1.10x vs USB's 1.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $192.2B | $86.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $585.1B | $117.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.69x | 12.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.21x | 10.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.10x | 1.41x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 31.17x | 11.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.31x | 2.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.13x | 1.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
USB leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TD delivers a 11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $12 for USB. USB carries lower financial leverage with a 1.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TD's 5.19x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.9% | +11.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.4% | +2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.19x | 1.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $546.6B | $31.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $116.9B | $46.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $663.6B | $77.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.38x | 0.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TD five years ago would be worth $17,593 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,721 for USB. Over the past 12 months, TD leads with a +67.9% total return vs USB's +31.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TD at 28.6% vs USB's 25.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.0% | +3.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +67.9% | +31.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +112.7% | +96.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.9% | +7.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +209.4% | +68.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.6% | +25.3% |
Risk & Volatility
TD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TD is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USB's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TD currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs USB's 90.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $114.56 | $61.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $69.56 | $42.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.6 | 41.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 7.6M |
Analyst Outlook
TD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TD as "Buy" and USB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.1% upside for USB (target: $64) vs -21.3% for TD (target: $90). TD is the only dividend payer here at 2.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $89.52 | $63.82 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.46 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.8% | 0.0% |
USB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TD leads in 3 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
TD vs USB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TD or USB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, U.
S. Bancorp (USB) is the stronger pick with 0. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD). U. S. Bancorp (USB) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TD or USB?
On trailing P/E, U.
S. Bancorp (USB) is the cheapest at 12. 0x versus The Toronto-Dominion Bank at 13. 7x. On forward P/E, U. S. Bancorp is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Toronto-Dominion Bank wins at 0. 98x versus U. S. Bancorp's 1. 27x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TD or USB?
Over the past 5 years, The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) delivered a total return of +75.
9%, compared to +7. 2% for U. S. Bancorp (USB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TD returned +209. 4% versus USB's +68. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TD or USB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
76β versus U. S. Bancorp's 0. 93β — meaning USB is approximately 22% more volatile than TD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U. S. Bancorp (USB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 119% versus 5% for The Toronto-Dominion Bank — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TD or USB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), U.
S. Bancorp (USB) is pulling ahead at 0. 3% versus -2. 8% for The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Toronto-Dominion Bank grew EPS 144. 9% year-over-year, compared to 21. 6% for U. S. Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TD or USB?
The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
7% net margin versus 17. 7% for U. S. Bancorp — meaning it keeps 17. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USB leads at 22. 2% versus 20. 7% for TD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USB leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TD or USB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus U. S. Bancorp's 1. 27x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, U. S. Bancorp (USB) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 12. 2x for The Toronto-Dominion Bank — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USB: 15. 1% to $63. 82.
08Which pays a better dividend — TD or USB?
In this comparison, TD (2.
8% yield) pays a dividend. USB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TD or USB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
76), 2. 8% yield, +209. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TD: +209. 4%, USB: +68. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TD and USB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
TD pays a dividend while USB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.