Banks - Diversified
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TD vs USB vs WFC vs PNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Regional
TD vs USB vs WFC vs PNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $192.18B | $86.24B | $252.37B | $91.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $115.84B | $42.86B | $125.40B | $33.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14.91B | $7.58B | $21.06B | $6.53B |
| Gross Margin | 49.0% | 62.8% | 62.2% | 59.4% |
| Operating Margin | 20.7% | 22.2% | 18.6% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | 12.2x | 10.9x | 11.7x | 12.3x |
| Total Debt | $663.58B | $77.93B | $281.88B | $61.67B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $116.93B | $46.89B | $203.36B | $46.25B |
TD vs USB vs WFC vs PNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Toronto-Dominio… (TD) | 100 | 255.0 | +155.0% |
| U.S. Bancorp (USB) | 100 | 150.6 | +50.6% |
| Wells Fargo & Compa… (WFC) | 100 | 318.8 | +218.8% |
| The PNC Financial S… (PNC) | 100 | 215.8 | +115.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TD vs USB vs WFC vs PNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 2.8%
- 209.4% 10Y total return vs WFC's 89.7%
- PEG 0.98 vs PNC's 3.22
- Beta 0.76, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.12x
USB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (10.9x vs 11.7x), PEG 1.27 vs 2.08
WFC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 8.7%, EPS growth 11.2%
- NIM 2.5% vs TD's 1.6%
- 8.7% NII/revenue growth vs TD's -2.8%
PNC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, current ratio 0.15x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.7% NII/revenue growth vs TD's -2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 11.7x), PEG 1.27 vs 2.08 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WFC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs WFC's 0.94 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs WFC's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +67.9% vs WFC's +10.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WFC's 0.4% |
TD vs USB vs WFC vs PNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TD vs USB vs WFC vs PNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
USB leads in 2 of 6 categories
TD leads 2 • PNC leads 1 • WFC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
USB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WFC is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.4B annually — 3.7x PNC's $33.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 17.7% (TD) to 15.7% (WFC).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $115.8B | $42.9B | $125.4B | $33.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $20.0B | $10.3B | $31.6B | $8.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14.9B | $7.6B | $21.1B | $6.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $13.0B | $5.1B | -$14.2B | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.0% | +62.8% | +62.2% | +59.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +22.2% | +18.6% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +17.7% | +15.7% | +17.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -62.0% | — | +2.4% | +23.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -61.2% | +24.8% | +16.9% | +24.6% |
Valuation Metrics
USB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.0x trailing earnings, USB trades at a 27% valuation discount to PNC's 16.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TD offers better value at 1.10x vs PNC's 4.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $192.2B | $86.2B | $252.4B | $91.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $585.1B | $117.3B | $330.9B | $107.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.69x | 12.03x | 15.20x | 16.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.21x | 10.88x | 11.66x | 12.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.10x | 1.41x | 2.72x | 4.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 31.17x | 11.40x | 10.70x | 14.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.31x | 2.01x | 2.01x | 2.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.13x | 1.31x | 1.56x | 1.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 83.15x | 11.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PNC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TD delivers a 11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $11 for PNC. PNC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TD's 5.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNC scores 7/9 vs USB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.9% | +11.5% | +11.5% | +11.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.1% | +1.0% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +5.2% | +3.7% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.4% | +2.3% | +5.0% | +5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.19x | 1.19x | 1.56x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $546.6B | $31.0B | $78.5B | $15.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $116.9B | $46.9B | $203.4B | $46.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $663.6B | $77.9B | $281.9B | $61.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.38x | 0.66x | 0.60x | 0.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TD and WFC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WFC five years ago would be worth $18,847 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,721 for USB. Over the past 12 months, TD leads with a +67.9% total return vs WFC's +10.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WFC at 28.8% vs USB's 25.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.0% | +3.8% | -13.3% | +9.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +67.9% | +31.0% | +10.6% | +33.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +112.7% | +96.8% | +113.6% | +99.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.9% | +7.2% | +88.5% | +32.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +209.4% | +68.2% | +89.7% | +206.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.6% | +25.3% | +28.8% | +26.0% |
Risk & Volatility
TD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TD is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WFC's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TD currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs WFC's 83.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.93x | 0.94x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $114.56 | $61.19 | $97.76 | $243.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $69.56 | $42.55 | $71.93 | $172.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +90.6% | +83.5% | +93.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.6 | 41.9 | 54.1 | 50.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 7.6M | 13.1M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
TD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TD as "Buy", USB as "Hold", WFC as "Hold", PNC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.8% upside for WFC (target: $99) vs -21.3% for TD (target: $90). For income investors, TD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.82% vs WFC's 1.81%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $89.52 | $63.82 | $99.38 | $252.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 49 | 60 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | — | +1.8% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.46 | — | $1.48 | $6.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.8% | 0.0% | +8.8% | +1.3% |
USB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TD leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
TD vs USB vs WFC vs PNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TD or USB or WFC or PNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is the stronger pick with 8.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD). U. S. Bancorp (USB) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TD or USB or WFC or PNC?
On trailing P/E, U.
S. Bancorp (USB) is the cheapest at 12. 0x versus The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. at 16. 5x. On forward P/E, U. S. Bancorp is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Toronto-Dominion Bank wins at 0. 98x versus The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. 's 3. 22x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TD or USB or WFC or PNC?
Over the past 5 years, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) delivered a total return of +88.
5%, compared to +7. 2% for U. S. Bancorp (USB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TD returned +209. 4% versus USB's +68. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TD or USB or WFC or PNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
76β versus Wells Fargo & Company's 0. 94β — meaning WFC is approximately 23% more volatile than TD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 113% versus 5% for The Toronto-Dominion Bank — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TD or USB or WFC or PNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is pulling ahead at 8.
7% versus -2. 8% for The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Toronto-Dominion Bank grew EPS 144. 9% year-over-year, compared to 7. 4% for The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TD or USB or WFC or PNC?
The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
7% net margin versus 15. 7% for Wells Fargo & Company — meaning it keeps 17. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USB leads at 22. 2% versus 18. 6% for WFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USB leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TD or USB or WFC or PNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. 's 3. 22x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, U. S. Bancorp (USB) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 12. 3x for The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. — 1. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WFC: 21. 8% to $99. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — TD or USB or WFC or PNC?
In this comparison, TD (2.
8% yield), PNC (2. 8% yield), WFC (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. USB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TD or USB or WFC or PNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
76), 2. 8% yield, +209. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TD: +209. 4%, USB: +68. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TD and USB and WFC and PNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
TD, WFC, PNC pay a dividend while USB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.