Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TDG vs HEI vs WWD vs CW vs KTOS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
TDG vs HEI vs WWD vs CW vs KTOS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $67.28B | $23.35B | $21.80B | $27.05B | $10.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.11B | $4.63B | $4.00B | $3.38B | $1.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.97B | $713M | $514M | $465M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 59.0% | 30.4% | 28.4% | 37.4% | 19.0% |
| Operating Margin | 46.5% | 22.8% | 15.0% | 18.0% | 1.9% |
| Forward P/E | 31.8x | 52.8x | 42.8x | 49.3x | 79.3x |
| Total Debt | $30.03B | $2.19B | $722M | $1.31B | $180M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.81B | $218M | $327M | $371M | $561M |
TDG vs HEI vs WWD vs CW vs KTOS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TransDigm Group Inc… (TDG) | 100 | 290.4 | +190.4% |
| HEICO Corporation (HEI) | 100 | 294.1 | +194.1% |
| Woodward, Inc. (WWD) | 100 | 557.6 | +457.6% |
| Curtiss-Wright Corp… (CW) | 100 | 740.4 | +640.4% |
| Kratos Defense & Se… (KTOS) | 100 | 331.6 | +231.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TDG vs HEI vs WWD vs CW vs KTOS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TDG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 13.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, current ratio 3.21x
- PEG 1.02 vs HEI's 3.21
- Beta 0.79, yield 13.9%, current ratio 3.21x
HEI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 16.3%, EPS growth 33.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.6%
WWD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if efficiency is your priority.
- 10.8% ROA vs KTOS's 0.9%, ROIC 13.3% vs 1.4%
CW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 8.2% 10Y total return vs KTOS's 12.2%
- +102.8% vs TDG's -13.0%
KTOS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 18.5% revenue growth vs WWD's 7.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% revenue growth vs WWD's 7.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (31.8x vs 79.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.6% margin vs KTOS's 1.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs KTOS's 1.84 | |
| Dividends | 13.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CW's 0.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +102.8% vs TDG's -13.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.8% ROA vs KTOS's 0.9%, ROIC 13.3% vs 1.4% |
TDG vs HEI vs WWD vs CW vs KTOS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TDG vs HEI vs WWD vs CW vs KTOS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TDG leads in 1 of 6 categories
CW leads 1 • HEI leads 0 • WWD leads 0 • KTOS leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDG is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.1B annually — 6.8x KTOS's $1.3B. TDG is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KTOS's 1.6%. On growth, WWD holds the edge at +23.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.1B | $4.6B | $4.0B | $3.4B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.6B | $1.2B | $715M | $727M | $66M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.0B | $713M | $514M | $465M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.9B | $841M | $389M | $517M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.0% | +30.4% | +28.4% | +37.4% | +19.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +46.5% | +22.8% | +15.0% | +18.0% | +1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.6% | +15.4% | +12.9% | +13.8% | +1.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.6% | +18.1% | +9.7% | +15.3% | -10.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.9% | +14.4% | +23.4% | +8.8% | +21.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.1% | +12.5% | +23.0% | +14.9% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TDG and HEI each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 37.1x trailing earnings, TDG trades at a 92% valuation discount to KTOS's 456.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TDG offers better value at 1.19x vs WWD's 3.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $67.3B | $23.4B | $21.8B | $27.0B | $10.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $94.5B | $25.3B | $22.2B | $28.0B | $9.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.14x | 56.60x | 50.86x | 56.64x | 456.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.79x | 52.79x | 42.76x | 49.30x | 79.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.19x | 3.44x | 3.64x | 2.60x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.85x | 20.84x | 35.55x | 43.87x | 110.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.62x | 5.21x | 6.11x | 7.73x | 7.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 8.91x | 8.76x | 10.83x | 5.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 37.05x | 27.11x | 64.06x | 48.85x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — WWD and KTOS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WWD delivers a 20.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $1 for KTOS. KTOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CW's 0.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WWD scores 9/9 vs KTOS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +12.9% | +20.3% | +18.4% | +1.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.6% | +7.9% | +10.8% | +9.1% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.9% | +12.6% | +13.3% | +14.1% | +1.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.8% | +14.0% | +14.3% | +16.6% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.50x | 0.28x | 0.52x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $27.2B | $2.0B | $395M | $943M | -$381M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.8B | $218M | $327M | $371M | $561M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30.0B | $2.2B | $722M | $1.3B | $180M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.55x | 8.32x | 14.53x | 14.92x | 5.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CW five years ago would be worth $57,755 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,320 for HEI. Over the past 12 months, CW leads with a +102.8% total return vs TDG's -13.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CW at 64.8% vs HEI's 17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.3% | -15.7% | +17.7% | +27.4% | -25.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.0% | +5.0% | +87.2% | +102.8% | +65.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.4% | +63.4% | +238.7% | +347.6% | +337.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +136.7% | +103.2% | +197.8% | +477.6% | +135.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +567.7% | +786.8% | +600.6% | +824.0% | +1218.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.9% | +17.8% | +50.2% | +64.8% | +63.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TDG and CW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TDG is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KTOS's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CW currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs KTOS's 44.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 1.04x | 1.19x | 1.23x | 1.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1623.83 | $361.69 | $407.00 | $748.14 | $134.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1123.61 | $256.11 | $190.51 | $352.03 | $32.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.4% | +76.7% | +89.9% | +97.4% | +44.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.2 | 42.6 | 41.2 | 52.9 | 37.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 368K | 683K | 680K | 302K | 4.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TDG and HEI and CW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TDG as "Buy", HEI as "Buy", WWD as "Buy", CW as "Buy", KTOS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 86.4% upside for KTOS (target: $111) vs -2.8% for CW (target: $709). For income investors, TDG offers the higher dividend yield at 13.89% vs CW's 0.13%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1617.88 | $371.00 | $433.17 | $708.50 | $110.58 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 39 | 34 | 20 | 25 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +13.9% | +0.1% | +0.3% | +0.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 10 | 4 | 10 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $165.45 | $0.23 | $1.06 | $0.92 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +0.1% | +0.8% | +1.7% | 0.0% |
TDG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CW leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
TDG vs HEI vs WWD vs CW vs KTOS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TDG or HEI or WWD or CW or KTOS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is the stronger pick with 18. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 3% for Woodward, Inc. (WWD). TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) offers the better valuation at 37. 1x trailing P/E (31. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) a "Buy" — based on 39 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TDG or HEI or WWD or CW or KTOS?
On trailing P/E, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the cheapest at 37.
1x versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. at 456. 2x. On forward P/E, TransDigm Group Incorporated is actually cheaper at 31. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TransDigm Group Incorporated wins at 1. 02x versus HEICO Corporation's 3. 21x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TDG or HEI or WWD or CW or KTOS?
Over the past 5 years, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) delivered a total return of +477.
6%, compared to +103. 2% for HEICO Corporation (HEI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KTOS returned +1337% versus TDG's +596. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TDG or HEI or WWD or CW or KTOS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning KTOS is approximately 134% more volatile than TDG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 52% for Curtiss-Wright Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TDG or HEI or WWD or CW or KTOS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is pulling ahead at 18. 5% versus 7. 3% for Woodward, Inc. (WWD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HEICO Corporation grew EPS 33. 5% year-over-year, compared to 18. 2% for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HEI leads at 26. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TDG or HEI or WWD or CW or KTOS?
TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
5% net margin versus 1. 6% for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TDG leads at 47. 2% versus 2. 1% for KTOS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDG leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TDG or HEI or WWD or CW or KTOS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 02x versus HEICO Corporation's 3. 21x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) trades at 31. 8x forward P/E versus 79. 3x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — 47. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KTOS: 86. 4% to $110. 58.
08Which pays a better dividend — TDG or HEI or WWD or CW or KTOS?
In this comparison, TDG (13.
9% yield), WWD (0. 3% yield), CW (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. HEI, KTOS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TDG or HEI or WWD or CW or KTOS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 13. 9% yield, +596. 5% 10Y return). Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TDG: +596. 5%, KTOS: +1337%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TDG and HEI and WWD and CW and KTOS?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TDG is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; HEI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WWD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KTOS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. TDG pays a dividend while HEI, WWD, CW, KTOS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.