TECK
Teck Resources Limited
Industrial Materials
Market Cap$29.25B
5Y Perf.+540.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TECK vs ERO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ERO
Ero Copper Corp.
Copper
Market Cap$2.83B
5Y Perf.+131.5%
TECK vs ERO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TECK | ERO |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Copper |
| Market Cap | $29.25B | $2.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.41B | $925M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.85B | $292M |
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 42.7% |
| Operating Margin | 23.9% | 34.5% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 6.6x |
| Total Debt | $10.39B | $631M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.01B | $105M |
TECK vs ERO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TECK
ERO
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teck Resources Limi… (TECK) | 100 | 640.1 | +540.1% |
| Ero Copper Corp. (ERO) | 100 | 231.5 | +131.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TECK vs ERO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ERO leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Teck Resources Limited is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TECK
Teck Resources Limited
The Long-Run Compounder
TECK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs ERO's 6.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 40.0%, current ratio 2.54x
- 0.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
ERO
Ero Copper Corp.
The Income Pick
ERO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.40
- Rev growth 70.0%, EPS growth 490.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.3%
- Beta 1.40, current ratio 1.06x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ERO | 70.0% revenue growth vs TECK's 18.6% |
| Value | ERO | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 13.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | ERO | 31.6% margin vs TECK's 14.9% |
| Stability / Safety | ERO | Beta 1.40 vs TECK's 1.73 |
| Dividends | TECK | 0.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ERO | +101.9% vs TECK's +79.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ERO | 15.3% ROA vs TECK's 4.1%, ROIC 15.5% vs 4.4% |
TECK vs ERO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEROLAGGINGTECK
TECKTeck Resources Limited
1leads
EROEro Copper Corp.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TECKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ERO5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ERO4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ERO8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TECK5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ERO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TECK is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.4B annually — 13.4x ERO's $925M. ERO is the more profitable business, keeping 31.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TECK's 14.9%. On growth, ERO holds the edge at +107.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TECKTeck Resources Li… | EROEro Copper Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.4B | $925M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.8B | $473M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $292M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $482M | $121M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +42.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +34.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +31.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +13.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.2% | +107.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +128.8% | +32.5% |
ERO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ERO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, ERO trades at a 64% valuation discount to TECK's 29.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ERO's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TECK's 12.3x.
| Metric | TECKTeck Resources Li… | EROEro Copper Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29.3B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33.2B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.29x | 10.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.98x | 6.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.33x | 8.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.71x | 3.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.58x | 3.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 30.98x |
ERO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ERO leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ERO delivers a 31.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $7 for TECK. TECK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ERO's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ERO scores 8/9 vs TECK's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TECKTeck Resources Li… | EROEro Copper Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.1% | +31.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +15.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +15.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.2% | +18.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.4B | $526M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.0B | $105M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.4B | $631M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.16x | 14.60x |
ERO leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TECK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TECK five years ago would be worth $24,779 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,903 for ERO. Over the past 12 months, ERO leads with a +101.9% total return vs TECK's +79.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TECK at 12.0% vs ERO's 9.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TECKTeck Resources Li… | EROEro Copper Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.7% | -6.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +79.8% | +101.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.5% | +31.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.8% | +19.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +599.3% | +597.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.0% | +9.5% |
TECK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TECK and ERO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ERO is the less volatile stock with a 1.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TECK's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TECK currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs ERO's 68.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TECKTeck Resources Li… | EROEro Copper Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $63.97 | $39.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.98 | $12.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +68.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.8 | 48.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.9M | 1.1M |
Evenly matched — TECK and ERO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TECK as "Buy" and ERO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.2% upside for ERO (target: $32) vs 6.2% for TECK (target: $65). TECK is the only dividend payer here at 0.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | TECKTeck Resources Li… | EROEro Copper Corp. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $64.50 | $31.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.50 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
ERO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TECK leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallEro Copper Corp. (ERO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TECK vs ERO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TECK or ERO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ero Copper Corp.
(ERO) is the stronger pick with 70. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 18. 6% for Teck Resources Limited (TECK). Ero Copper Corp. (ERO) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teck Resources Limited (TECK) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TECK or ERO?
On trailing P/E, Ero Copper Corp.
(ERO) is the cheapest at 10. 5x versus Teck Resources Limited at 29. 3x. On forward P/E, Ero Copper Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TECK or ERO?
Over the past 5 years, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) delivered a total return of +147.
8%, compared to +19. 0% for Ero Copper Corp. (ERO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TECK returned +599. 3% versus ERO's +597. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TECK or ERO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ero Copper Corp.
(ERO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 40β versus Teck Resources Limited's 1. 73β — meaning TECK is approximately 23% more volatile than ERO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 67% for Ero Copper Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TECK or ERO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ero Copper Corp.
(ERO) is pulling ahead at 70. 0% versus 18. 6% for Teck Resources Limited (TECK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ero Copper Corp. grew EPS 490. 9% year-over-year, compared to 262. 8% for Teck Resources Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, ERO leads at 23. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TECK or ERO?
Ero Copper Corp.
(ERO) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 6% net margin versus 13. 0% for Teck Resources Limited — meaning it keeps 33. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ERO leads at 33. 8% versus 16. 5% for TECK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ERO leads at 43. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TECK or ERO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ero Copper Corp.
(ERO) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 13. 0x for Teck Resources Limited — 6. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ERO: 16. 2% to $31. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — TECK or ERO?
In this comparison, TECK (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. ERO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TECK or ERO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
6% yield, +599. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TECK: +599. 3%, ERO: +597. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TECK and ERO?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
TECK pays a dividend while ERO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TECK: 72.2% · ERO: 107.5%)Net Margin>
%
(TECK: 14.9% · ERO: 31.6%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TECK: 29.3x · ERO: 10.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.