Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TECK vs FCX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TECK
Teck Resources Limited

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$29.86B
5Y Perf.+553.4%
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

Copper

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$87.51B
5Y Perf.+571.3%

TECK vs FCX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TECK logoTECK
FCX logoFCX
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsCopper
Market Cap$29.86B$87.51B
Revenue (TTM)$12.41B$26.42B
Net Income (TTM)$1.85B$2.73B
Gross Margin30.3%27.8%
Operating Margin23.9%27.8%
Forward P/E13.3x22.5x
Total Debt$10.39B$11.50B
Cash & Equiv.$5.01B$3.35B

TECK vs FCXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TECK
FCX
StockMay 20May 26Return
Teck Resources Limi… (TECK)100653.4+553.4%
Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX)100671.3+571.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TECK vs FCX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TECK leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Freeport-McMoRan Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TECK
Teck Resources Limited
The Growth Play

TECK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 262.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.7%
  • 5.3% 10Y total return vs FCX's 444.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 40.0%, current ratio 2.54x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
The Income Pick

FCX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.79, yield 1.0%
  • 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs TECK's 0.6%
  • 4.7% ROA vs TECK's 4.1%, ROIC 12.8% vs 4.4%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTECK logoTECK18.6% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
ValueTECK logoTECKLower P/E (13.3x vs 22.5x)
Quality / MarginsTECK logoTECK14.9% margin vs FCX's 10.3%
Stability / SafetyTECK logoTECKBeta 1.73 vs FCX's 1.79
DividendsFCX logoFCX1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs TECK's 0.6%
Momentum (1Y)TECK logoTECK+77.7% vs FCX's +62.2%
Efficiency (ROA)FCX logoFCX4.7% ROA vs TECK's 4.1%, ROIC 12.8% vs 4.4%

TECK vs FCX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TECKTeck Resources Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

FCXFreeport-McMoRan Inc.
FY 2025
Copper Cathode
31.4%$8.1B
Copper In Concentrates
24.3%$6.3B
Refined Copper Products
17.0%$4.4B
Gold
15.0%$3.9B
Molybdenum
7.6%$2.0B
Other Products Or Services
2.9%$749M
Purchased Copper
1.7%$449M

TECK vs FCX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTECKLAGGINGFCX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — TECK and FCX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FCX is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.4B annually — 2.1x TECK's $12.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.9% (TECK) to 10.3% (FCX). On growth, TECK holds the edge at +72.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$12.4B$26.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$4.8B$9.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.8B$2.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$482M$6.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+30.3%+27.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+23.9%+27.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.9%+10.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.9%+23.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+72.2%+12.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+128.8%+154.2%
Evenly matched — TECK and FCX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TECK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 29.8x trailing earnings, TECK trades at a 26% valuation discount to FCX's 40.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FCX's 11.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TECK's 12.5x.

MetricTECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …
Market CapShares × price$29.9B$87.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$33.8B$95.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS29.77x40.06x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.25x22.51x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.34x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.51x11.21x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.77x3.40x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.61x2.86x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF78.41x
TECK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FCX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

FCX delivers a 8.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $7 for TECK. FCX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TECK's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TECK scores 6/9 vs FCX's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricTECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.1%+8.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.1%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.4%+12.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.2%+12.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.40x0.37x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5.4B$8.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5.0B$3.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10.4B$11.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.16x17.68x
FCX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TECK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TECK five years ago would be worth $26,295 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,151 for FCX. Over the past 12 months, TECK leads with a +77.7% total return vs FCX's +62.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FCX at 19.7% vs TECK's 12.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+29.3%+17.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+77.7%+62.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+43.4%+71.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+163.0%+51.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+530.4%+444.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+12.8%+19.7%
TECK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

TECK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

TECK is the less volatile stock with a 1.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FCX's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TECK currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs FCX's 85.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.73x1.79x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$63.27$70.97
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$30.98$35.15
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.0%+85.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.541.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.9M15.4M
TECK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FCX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates TECK as "Buy" and FCX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.0% upside for FCX (target: $67) vs 4.0% for TECK (target: $65). For income investors, FCX offers the higher dividend yield at 0.98% vs TECK's 0.59%.

MetricTECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$64.50$67.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2641
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.6%+1.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises05
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.50$0.60
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.5%+0.1%
FCX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TECK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). FCX leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallTeck Resources Limited (TECK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TECK vs FCX: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TECK or FCX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger pick with 18.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Teck Resources Limited (TECK) offers the better valuation at 29. 8x trailing P/E (13. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teck Resources Limited (TECK) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TECK or FCX?

On trailing P/E, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the cheapest at 29.

8x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 40. 1x. On forward P/E, Teck Resources Limited is actually cheaper at 13. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TECK or FCX?

Over the past 5 years, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) delivered a total return of +163.

0%, compared to +51. 5% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TECK returned +530. 4% versus FCX's +444. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TECK or FCX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

73β versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning FCX is approximately 3% more volatile than TECK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 40% for Teck Resources Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TECK or FCX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is pulling ahead at 18.

6% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teck Resources Limited grew EPS 262. 8% year-over-year, compared to 16. 9% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FCX leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TECK or FCX?

Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

0% net margin versus 8. 6% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCX leads at 24. 4% versus 16. 5% for TECK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCX leads at 27. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TECK or FCX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) trades at 13.

3x forward P/E versus 22. 5x for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — 9. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FCX: 10. 0% to $67. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TECK or FCX?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) offers the highest yield at 1. 0%, versus 0. 6% for Teck Resources Limited (TECK).

09

Is TECK or FCX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.

6% yield, +530. 4% 10Y return). Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TECK: +530. 4%, FCX: +444. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TECK and FCX?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TECK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

TECK

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 36%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FCX

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TECK and FCX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TECK: 72.2% · FCX: 12.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(TECK: 14.9% · FCX: 10.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(TECK: 29.8x · FCX: 40.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.