TECK
Teck Resources Limited
Industrial Materials
Market Cap$29.86B
5Y Perf.+553.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TECK vs LIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
LIN
Linde plc
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$232.56B
5Y Perf.+148.0%
TECK vs LIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TECK | LIN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $29.86B | $232.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.41B | $34.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.85B | $7.13B |
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 46.0% |
| Operating Margin | 23.9% | 28.8% |
| Forward P/E | 13.3x | 28.1x |
| Total Debt | $10.39B | $26.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.01B | $5.06B |
TECK vs LIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TECK
LIN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teck Resources Limi… (TECK) | 100 | 653.4 | +553.4% |
| Linde plc (LIN) | 100 | 248.0 | +148.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TECK vs LIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: LIN leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Teck Resources Limited is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TECK
Teck Resources Limited
The Growth Play
TECK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 262.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.7%
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs LIN's 376.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 40.0%, current ratio 2.54x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
LIN
Linde plc
The Income Pick
LIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 1.2%
- Beta 0.24, yield 1.2%, current ratio 0.88x
- 20.6% margin vs TECK's 14.9%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TECK | 18.6% revenue growth vs LIN's 3.0% |
| Value | TECK | Lower P/E (13.3x vs 28.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | LIN | 20.6% margin vs TECK's 14.9% |
| Stability / Safety | LIN | Beta 0.24 vs TECK's 1.73 |
| Dividends | LIN | 1.2% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs TECK's 0.6% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TECK | +77.7% vs LIN's +13.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LIN | 8.3% ROA vs TECK's 4.1%, ROIC 11.3% vs 4.4% |
TECK vs LIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
TECK vs LIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLLINLAGGINGTECK
TECKTeck Resources Limited
2leads
LINLinde plc
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TECKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
LIN4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TECK5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
LIN5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TECK6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
LIN2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.7B annually — 2.8x TECK's $12.4B. LIN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TECK's 14.9%. On growth, TECK holds the edge at +72.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TECKTeck Resources Li… | LINLinde plc |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.4B | $34.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.8B | $12.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $7.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $482M | $5.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +46.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +28.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +14.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.2% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +128.8% | +13.4% |
LIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TECK leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.8x trailing earnings, TECK trades at a 13% valuation discount to LIN's 34.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TECK's 12.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LIN's 20.0x.
| Metric | TECKTeck Resources Li… | LINLinde plc |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29.9B | $232.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33.8B | $254.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.77x | 34.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.25x | 28.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.51x | 20.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.77x | 6.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.61x | 5.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 45.70x |
TECK leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $7 for TECK. TECK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIN's 0.68x.
| Metric | TECKTeck Resources Li… | LINLinde plc |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.1% | +17.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +11.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.2% | +13.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.4B | $21.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.0B | $5.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.4B | $27.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.16x | 34.52x |
LIN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TECK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TECK five years ago would be worth $26,295 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,813 for LIN. Over the past 12 months, TECK leads with a +77.7% total return vs LIN's +13.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TECK at 12.8% vs LIN's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TECKTeck Resources Li… | LINLinde plc |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.3% | +17.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.7% | +13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.4% | +41.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +163.0% | +78.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +530.4% | +376.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.8% | +12.4% |
TECK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TECK and LIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TECK's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | TECKTeck Resources Li… | LINLinde plc |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 0.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $63.27 | $521.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.98 | $387.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.5 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.9M | 2.3M |
Evenly matched — TECK and LIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TECK as "Buy" and LIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.5% upside for LIN (target: $540) vs 4.0% for TECK (target: $65). For income investors, LIN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.20% vs TECK's 0.59%.
| Metric | TECKTeck Resources Li… | LINLinde plc |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $64.50 | $539.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.50 | $6.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +2.0% |
LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
LIN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TECK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallLinde plc (LIN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TECK vs LIN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TECK or LIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger pick with 18.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). Teck Resources Limited (TECK) offers the better valuation at 29. 8x trailing P/E (13. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teck Resources Limited (TECK) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TECK or LIN?
On trailing P/E, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the cheapest at 29.
8x versus Linde plc at 34. 4x. On forward P/E, Teck Resources Limited is actually cheaper at 13. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TECK or LIN?
Over the past 5 years, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) delivered a total return of +163.
0%, compared to +78. 1% for Linde plc (LIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TECK returned +530. 4% versus LIN's +376. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TECK or LIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
24β versus Teck Resources Limited's 1. 73β — meaning TECK is approximately 619% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 68% for Linde plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TECK or LIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is pulling ahead at 18.
6% versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teck Resources Limited grew EPS 262. 8% year-over-year, compared to 7. 1% for Linde plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIN leads at 0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TECK or LIN?
Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
3% net margin versus 13. 0% for Teck Resources Limited — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIN leads at 26. 3% versus 16. 5% for TECK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LIN leads at 43. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TECK or LIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) trades at 13.
3x forward P/E versus 28. 1x for Linde plc — 14. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LIN: 7. 5% to $539. 71.
08Which pays a better dividend — TECK or LIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Linde plc (LIN) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 0. 6% for Teck Resources Limited (TECK).
09Is TECK or LIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
24), 1. 2% yield, +376. 9% 10Y return). Teck Resources Limited (TECK) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +376. 9%, TECK: +530. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TECK and LIN?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TECK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LIN is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TECK: 72.2% · LIN: 8.2%)Net Margin>
%
(TECK: 14.9% · LIN: 20.6%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TECK: 29.8x · LIN: 34.4x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.