Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TECX vs MEDP vs CRL vs RXRX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Biotechnology
TECX vs MEDP vs CRL vs RXRX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $505M | $12.24B | $8.98B | $1.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2.68B | $4.03B | $66M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-83M | $460M | $-185M | $-560M |
| Gross Margin | — | 29.1% | 24.9% | -34.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 21.0% | 11.8% | -8.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.2x | 16.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $1M | $250M | $3.07B | $78M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $254M | $497M | $214M | $743M |
TECX vs MEDP vs CRL vs RXRX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tectonic Therapeuti… (TECX) | 100 | 19.2 | -80.8% |
| Medpace Holdings, I… (MEDP) | 100 | 252.7 | +152.7% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 54.7 | -45.3% |
| Recursion Pharmaceu… (RXRX) | 100 | 9.8 | -90.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TECX vs MEDP vs CRL vs RXRX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TECX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.76, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 26.63x
- Beta 1.76, current ratio 26.63x
MEDP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.26
- 14.4% 10Y total return vs CRL's 119.2%
- 17.2% margin vs RXRX's -8.4%
- Beta 1.26 vs RXRX's 3.18
CRL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
RXRX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.9%, EPS growth 14.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.5%
- 26.9% revenue growth vs TECX's -43.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.9% revenue growth vs TECX's -43.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.2% margin vs RXRX's -8.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs RXRX's 3.18 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.9% vs RXRX's -22.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.8% ROA vs RXRX's -40.6%, ROIC 154.9% vs -95.8% |
TECX vs MEDP vs CRL vs RXRX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TECX vs MEDP vs CRL vs RXRX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MEDP leads in 2 of 6 categories
CRL leads 1 • TECX leads 0 • RXRX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRL and TECX operate at a comparable scale, with $4.0B and $0 in trailing revenue. MEDP is the more profitable business, keeping 17.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RXRX's -8.4%. On growth, MEDP holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $2.7B | $4.0B | $66M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$89M | $577M | $757M | -$521M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$83M | $460M | -$185M | -$560M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$66M | $745M | $391M | -$326M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +29.1% | +24.9% | -34.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +21.0% | +11.8% | -8.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +17.2% | -4.6% | -8.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +27.8% | +9.7% | -4.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +26.5% | +1.2% | -56.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.1% | +16.6% | -160.0% | +56.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CRL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CRL's 13.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MEDP's 21.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $505M | $12.2B | $9.0B | $1.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $252M | $12.0B | $11.8B | $797M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.63x | 28.06x | -62.52x | -2.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.24x | 16.42x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.88x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.31x | 12.98x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.84x | 2.24x | 19.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.96x | 27.57x | 2.81x | 1.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.96x | 17.31x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP delivers a 120.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $-54 for RXRX. TECX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRL's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MEDP scores 6/9 vs RXRX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.3% | +120.9% | -5.7% | -54.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.9% | +24.8% | -2.5% | -40.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -76.5% | +154.9% | +6.3% | -95.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -42.8% | +65.7% | +8.1% | -50.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.55x | 0.95x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$253M | -$247M | $2.9B | -$665M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $254M | $497M | $214M | $743M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $250M | $3.1B | $78M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1627.77x | — | 6.38x | -336.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TECX and MEDP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MEDP five years ago would be worth $25,938 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,179 for RXRX. Over the past 12 months, MEDP leads with a +42.9% total return vs RXRX's -22.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TECX at 46.6% vs RXRX's -16.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.5% | -24.9% | -10.1% | -22.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.6% | +42.9% | +32.8% | -22.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +215.4% | +104.6% | -4.2% | -41.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.0% | +159.4% | -46.9% | -88.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.8% | +1442.7% | +119.2% | -81.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.6% | +27.0% | -1.4% | -16.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MEDP and CRL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MEDP is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RXRX's 3.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRL currently trades 79.5% from its 52-week high vs RXRX's 45.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.76x | 1.26x | 1.52x | 3.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.02 | $628.92 | $228.88 | $7.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.39 | $284.48 | $131.30 | $2.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.6% | +68.2% | +79.5% | +45.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 40.6 | 57.2 | 49.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 249K | 371K | 806K | 12.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TECX as "Buy", MEDP as "Hold", CRL as "Buy", RXRX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 236.4% upside for RXRX (target: $11) vs 12.9% for CRL (target: $205).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $67.50 | $498.86 | $205.43 | $11.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 19 | 36 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.5% | +4.0% | 0.0% |
MEDP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CRL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TECX vs MEDP vs CRL vs RXRX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TECX or MEDP or CRL or RXRX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RXRX) is the stronger pick with 26. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) offers the better valuation at 28. 1x trailing P/E (25. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tectonic Therapeutic, Inc. (TECX) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TECX or MEDP or CRL or RXRX?
On forward P/E, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TECX or MEDP or CRL or RXRX?
Over the past 5 years, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) delivered a total return of +159. 4%, compared to -88. 2% for Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEDP returned +1443% versus TECX's -92. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TECX or MEDP or CRL or RXRX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 3. 18β — meaning RXRX is approximately 153% more volatile than MEDP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tectonic Therapeutic, Inc. (TECX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 95% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TECX or MEDP or CRL or RXRX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RXRX) is pulling ahead at 26. 9% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Medpace Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 21. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RXRX leads at 23. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TECX or MEDP or CRL or RXRX?
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus -863. 4% for Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MEDP leads at 21. 1% versus -867. 9% for RXRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRL leads at 30. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TECX or MEDP or CRL or RXRX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
(CRL) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 25. 2x for Medpace Holdings, Inc. — 8. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RXRX: 236. 4% to $11. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TECX or MEDP or CRL or RXRX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TECX or MEDP or CRL or RXRX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +1443% 10Y return). Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX) carries a higher beta of 3. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEDP: +1443%, RXRX: -81. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TECX and MEDP and CRL and RXRX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TECX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MEDP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RXRX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.