TEL
TE Connectivity Ltd.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$63.43B
5Y Perf.+166.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TEL vs BDC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
BDC
Belden Inc.
Communication Equipment
Market Cap$4.46B
5Y Perf.+236.8%
TEL vs BDC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TEL | BDC |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $63.43B | $4.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.52B | $2.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.91B | $237M |
| Gross Margin | 35.4% | 35.8% |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | 12.3% |
| Forward P/E | 19.3x | 14.5x |
| Total Debt | $6.55B | $1.47B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.25B | $390M |
TEL vs BDC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TEL
BDC
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) | 100 | 266.1 | +166.1% |
| Belden Inc. (BDC) | 100 | 336.8 | +236.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TEL vs BDC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TEL leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Belden Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TEL
TE Connectivity Ltd.
The Income Pick
TEL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.58, yield 1.2%
- 299.1% 10Y total return vs BDC's 88.3%
- 15.7% margin vs BDC's 8.5%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
BDC
Belden Inc.
The Growth Play
BDC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 10.3%, EPS growth 23.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.41, current ratio 1.93x
- Beta 1.41, yield 0.2%, current ratio 1.93x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BDC | 10.3% revenue growth vs TEL's 7.9% |
| Value | BDC | Lower P/E (14.5x vs 19.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | TEL | 15.7% margin vs BDC's 8.5% |
| Stability / Safety | BDC | Beta 1.41 vs TEL's 1.58 |
| Dividends | TEL | 1.2% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs BDC's 0.2% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TEL | +47.5% vs BDC's +10.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TEL | 11.5% ROA vs BDC's 6.8%, ROIC 14.1% vs 11.0% |
TEL vs BDC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
TEL vs BDC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTELLAGGINGBDC
BDCBelden Inc.
1leads
TELTE Connectivity Ltd.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BDCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TEL5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
BDC5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TEL6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TEL4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
TEL2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TEL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TEL is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.5B annually — 6.6x BDC's $2.8B. TEL is the more profitable business, keeping 15.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BDC's 8.5%. On growth, TEL holds the edge at +14.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TELTE Connectivity L… | BDCBelden Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18.5B | $2.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.3B | $475M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.9B | $237M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.4B | $180M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.4% | +35.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +12.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +8.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +6.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.5% | +11.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.0% | +2.4% |
TEL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
BDC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.4x trailing earnings, BDC trades at a 45% valuation discount to TEL's 35.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BDC's 12.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TEL's 17.0x.
| Metric | TELTE Connectivity L… | BDCBelden Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $63.4B | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $68.7B | $5.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.09x | 19.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.28x | 14.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.97x | 12.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.71x | 1.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.08x | 3.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.80x | 20.41x |
BDC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TEL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TEL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $19 for BDC. TEL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BDC's 1.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BDC scores 7/9 vs TEL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TELTE Connectivity L… | BDCBelden Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.5% | +18.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.5% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.1% | +11.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.9% | +12.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 1.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.3B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.3B | $390M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.5B | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 31.48x | 6.89x |
TEL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TEL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BDC five years ago would be worth $22,829 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,812 for TEL. Over the past 12 months, TEL leads with a +47.5% total return vs BDC's +10.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TEL at 22.2% vs BDC's 12.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TELTE Connectivity L… | BDCBelden Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.0% | -2.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.5% | +10.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.6% | +43.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.1% | +128.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +299.1% | +88.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.2% | +12.8% |
TEL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TEL and BDC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BDC is the less volatile stock with a 1.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TEL's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TEL currently trades 85.6% from its 52-week high vs BDC's 71.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TELTE Connectivity L… | BDCBelden Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.58x | 1.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $252.56 | $159.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $147.75 | $102.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.6% | +71.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.9 | 33.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 376K |
Evenly matched — TEL and BDC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
TEL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TEL as "Buy" and BDC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.8% upside for BDC (target: $150) vs 21.5% for TEL (target: $263). For income investors, TEL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.24% vs BDC's 0.17%.
| Metric | TELTE Connectivity L… | BDCBelden Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $262.57 | $150.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.69 | $0.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +4.8% |
TEL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
TEL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BDC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallTE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TEL vs BDC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TEL or BDC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Belden Inc.
(BDC) is the stronger pick with 10. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 9% for TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL). Belden Inc. (BDC) offers the better valuation at 19. 4x trailing P/E (14. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TEL or BDC?
On trailing P/E, Belden Inc.
(BDC) is the cheapest at 19. 4x versus TE Connectivity Ltd. at 35. 1x. On forward P/E, Belden Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TEL or BDC?
Over the past 5 years, Belden Inc.
(BDC) delivered a total return of +128. 3%, compared to +68. 1% for TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TEL returned +299. 1% versus BDC's +88. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TEL or BDC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Belden Inc.
(BDC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 41β versus TE Connectivity Ltd. 's 1. 58β — meaning TEL is approximately 12% more volatile than BDC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 117% for Belden Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TEL or BDC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Belden Inc.
(BDC) is pulling ahead at 10. 3% versus 7. 9% for TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Belden Inc. grew EPS 23. 1% year-over-year, compared to -40. 4% for TE Connectivity Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TEL leads at 1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TEL or BDC?
TE Connectivity Ltd.
(TEL) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 8. 7% for Belden Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TEL leads at 18. 8% versus 12. 2% for BDC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BDC leads at 36. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TEL or BDC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Belden Inc.
(BDC) trades at 14. 5x forward P/E versus 19. 3x for TE Connectivity Ltd. — 4. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BDC: 30. 8% to $150. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TEL or BDC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 0. 2% for Belden Inc. (BDC).
09Is TEL or BDC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TE Connectivity Ltd.
(TEL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 2% yield, +299. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TEL: +299. 1%, BDC: +88. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TEL and BDC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
TEL pays a dividend while BDC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TEL: 14.5% · BDC: 11.4%)Net Margin>
%
(TEL: 15.7% · BDC: 8.5%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TEL: 35.1x · BDC: 19.4x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.