Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TELA vs ISRG vs ATRC vs NVCR vs ZBH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
TELA vs ISRG vs ATRC vs NVCR vs ZBH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $44M | $161.07B | $1.41B | $1.92B | $16.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $77M | $10.58B | $552M | $674M | $8.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-39M | $2.98B | $-5M | $-173M | $761M |
| Gross Margin | 67.2% | 66.3% | 75.5% | 75.2% | 70.0% |
| Operating Margin | -46.0% | 30.5% | -0.4% | -27.2% | 15.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 43.8x | 370.7x | — | 9.8x |
| Total Debt | $43M | $303M | $88M | $290M | $7.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $53M | $3.37B | $167M | $103M | $592M |
TELA vs ISRG vs ATRC vs NVCR vs ZBH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TELA Bio, Inc. (TELA) | 100 | 8.0 | -92.0% |
| Intuitive Surgical,… (ISRG) | 100 | 234.6 | +134.6% |
| AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) | 100 | 58.1 | -41.9% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
| Zimmer Biomet Holdi… (ZBH) | 100 | 68.0 | -32.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TELA vs ISRG vs ATRC vs NVCR vs ZBH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TELA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 0.57
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 34.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, current ratio 5.01x
- Beta 0.57, current ratio 5.01x
ISRG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs ATRC's 95.1%
- 20.5% revenue growth vs ZBH's 7.2%
- 28.2% margin vs TELA's -50.6%
- 14.8% ROA vs TELA's -53.1%, ROIC 15.0% vs -151.6%
ATRC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ZBH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.
- Better valuation composite
- 1.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.5% revenue growth vs ZBH's 7.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.2% margin vs TELA's -50.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs NVCR's 2.20 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.8% vs ISRG's -15.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.8% ROA vs TELA's -53.1%, ROIC 15.0% vs -151.6% |
TELA vs ISRG vs ATRC vs NVCR vs ZBH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TELA vs ISRG vs ATRC vs NVCR vs ZBH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ISRG leads in 3 of 6 categories
ZBH leads 1 • TELA leads 0 • ATRC leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.6B annually — 137.3x TELA's $77M. ISRG is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TELA's -50.6%. On growth, ISRG holds the edge at +23.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $77M | $10.6B | $552M | $674M | $8.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$34M | $3.8B | $13M | -$165M | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$39M | $3.0B | -$5M | -$173M | $761M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$32M | $2.8B | $54M | -$48M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.2% | +66.3% | +75.5% | +75.2% | +70.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -46.0% | +30.5% | -0.4% | -27.2% | +15.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -50.6% | +28.2% | -0.8% | -25.7% | +9.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -40.9% | +26.8% | +9.7% | -7.1% | +21.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.1% | +23.0% | +14.3% | +12.3% | +9.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +54.8% | +18.8% | +101.6% | -100.0% | +34.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ZBH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.5x trailing earnings, ZBH trades at a 59% valuation discount to ISRG's 57.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ZBH's 9.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATRC's 77.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $44M | $161.1B | $1.4B | $1.9B | $16.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $35M | $158.0B | $1.3B | $2.1B | $23.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.83x | 57.62x | -115.83x | -13.80x | 23.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 43.84x | 370.67x | — | 9.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.65x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 43.62x | 77.75x | — | 9.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.64x | 16.00x | 2.63x | 2.92x | 1.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.10x | 9.17x | 2.70x | 5.51x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 64.67x | 29.15x | — | 11.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TELA. ISRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TELA's 1.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ISRG scores 6/9 vs TELA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +16.9% | -1.0% | -50.8% | +5.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -53.1% | +14.8% | -0.7% | -16.5% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -151.6% | +15.0% | -0.6% | -16.4% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -51.4% | +16.5% | -0.6% | -28.9% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.51x | 0.02x | 0.18x | 0.85x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | -$3.1B | -$79M | $187M | $6.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $53M | $3.4B | $167M | $103M | $592M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $43M | $303M | $88M | $290M | $7.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.99x | — | 0.47x | -96.80x | 4.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ISRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ISRG five years ago would be worth $15,873 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $853 for TELA. Over the past 12 months, TELA leads with a +15.8% total return vs ISRG's -15.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ISRG at 14.4% vs TELA's -51.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.5% | -19.3% | -29.2% | +28.3% | -7.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.8% | -15.4% | -8.3% | +1.1% | -10.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.9% | +49.6% | -41.8% | -75.7% | -37.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.5% | +58.7% | -64.2% | -91.3% | -47.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.8% | +554.2% | +95.1% | +30.3% | -17.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -51.9% | +14.4% | -16.5% | -37.6% | -14.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TELA and NVCR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TELA is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs TELA's 50.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 1.02x | 1.03x | 2.20x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.20 | $603.88 | $43.18 | $20.06 | $108.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.50 | $427.84 | $26.62 | $9.82 | $79.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.0% | +75.1% | +64.4% | +83.9% | +77.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.7 | 42.4 | 45.0 | 69.8 | 34.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 188K | 1.8M | 669K | 1.5M | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ISRG as "Buy", ATRC as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", ZBH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 17.4% for ZBH (target: $98). ZBH is the only dividend payer here at 1.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $622.60 | $50.67 | $33.50 | $97.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 55 | 19 | 15 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | +0.8% | 0.0% | +3.0% |
ISRG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ZBH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TELA vs ISRG vs ATRC vs NVCR vs ZBH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TELA or ISRG or ATRC or NVCR or ZBH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the stronger pick with 20. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 2% for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH). Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) offers the better valuation at 23. 5x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) a "Buy" — based on 55 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TELA or ISRG or ATRC or NVCR or ZBH?
On trailing P/E, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
(ZBH) is the cheapest at 23. 5x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. at 57. 6x. On forward P/E, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TELA or ISRG or ATRC or NVCR or ZBH?
Over the past 5 years, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) delivered a total return of +58. 7%, compared to -91. 5% for TELA Bio, Inc. (TELA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ISRG returned +554. 2% versus TELA's -91. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TELA or ISRG or ATRC or NVCR or ZBH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TELA Bio, Inc.
(TELA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 287% more volatile than TELA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 151% for TELA Bio, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TELA or ISRG or ATRC or NVCR or ZBH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is pulling ahead at 20. 5% versus 7. 2% for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AtriCure, Inc. grew EPS 74. 7% year-over-year, compared to -19. 9% for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TELA leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TELA or ISRG or ATRC or NVCR or ZBH?
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus -54. 6% for TELA Bio, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ISRG leads at 29. 3% versus -49. 2% for TELA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TELA or ISRG or ATRC or NVCR or ZBH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
(ZBH) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 370. 7x for AtriCure, Inc. — 360. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — TELA or ISRG or ATRC or NVCR or ZBH?
In this comparison, ZBH (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. TELA, ISRG, ATRC, NVCR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TELA or ISRG or ATRC or NVCR or ZBH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
(ZBH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 1. 1% yield). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZBH: -17. 8%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TELA and ISRG and ATRC and NVCR and ZBH?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TELA is a small-cap high-growth stock; ISRG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ATRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZBH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ZBH pays a dividend while TELA, ISRG, ATRC, NVCR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.