TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$1.30B
5Y Perf.+223.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TEN vs NAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
NAT
Nordic American Tankers Limited
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$1.22B
5Y Perf.+26.3%
TEN vs NAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TEN | NAT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $1.30B | $1.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $779M | $281M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $110M | $2M |
| Gross Margin | 33.4% | 16.6% |
| Operating Margin | 27.0% | 6.2% |
| Forward P/E | 6.4x | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.76B | $270M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $348M | $39M |
TEN vs NAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TEN
NAT
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tsakos Energy Navig… (TEN) | 100 | 323.4 | +223.4% |
| Nordic American Tan… (NAT) | 100 | 126.3 | +26.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TEN vs NAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TEN leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Nordic American Tankers Limited is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited
The Growth Play
TEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -9.6%, EPS growth -44.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
- 73.7% 10Y total return vs NAT's -38.2%
- -9.6% revenue growth vs NAT's -10.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
NAT
Nordic American Tankers Limited
The Income Pick
NAT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 7.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 53.0%, current ratio 1.65x
- Beta 0.27, yield 7.2%, current ratio 1.65x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TEN | -9.6% revenue growth vs NAT's -10.7% |
| Value | TEN | Lower P/E (6.4x vs 10.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | TEN | 14.1% margin vs NAT's 0.7% |
| Stability / Safety | NAT | Beta 0.27 vs TEN's 0.33, lower leverage |
| Dividends | NAT | 7.2% yield, vs TEN's 5.6% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TEN | +156.6% vs NAT's +135.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TEN | 3.0% ROA vs NAT's 0.2%, ROIC 6.9% vs 7.5% |
TEN vs NAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2021
FY 2024
TEN vs NAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTENLAGGINGNAT
NATNordic American Tanke…
1leads
TENTsakos Energy Navigat…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs NATMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TEN4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TEN5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
NAT5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TEN6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TEN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $779M annually — 2.8x NAT's $281M. TEN is the more profitable business, keeping 14.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAT's 0.7%.
| Metric | TENTsakos Energy Nav… | NATNordic American T… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $779M | $281M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $327M | $75M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $110M | $2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$503M | -$112M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.4% | +16.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.0% | +6.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -64.5% | -39.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.7% | -8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -71.6% | -131.5% |
TEN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TEN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.6x trailing earnings, TEN trades at a 67% valuation discount to NAT's 26.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TEN's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NAT's 10.9x.
| Metric | TENTsakos Energy Nav… | NATNordic American T… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.58x | 26.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.44x | 10.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.11x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.49x | 10.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.62x | 3.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.72x | 2.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.73x |
TEN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NAT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TEN delivers a 6.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $0 for NAT. NAT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TEN's 1.00x.
| Metric | TENTsakos Energy Nav… | NATNordic American T… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +0.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.9% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.8% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.00x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $231M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $348M | $39M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $270M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.06x | 1.06x |
NAT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TEN five years ago would be worth $47,620 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $21,976 for NAT. Over the past 12 months, TEN leads with a +156.6% total return vs NAT's +135.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TEN at 42.1% vs NAT's 27.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TENTsakos Energy Nav… | NATNordic American T… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +99.5% | +76.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +156.6% | +135.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +186.7% | +105.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +376.2% | +119.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.7% | -38.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +42.1% | +27.1% |
TEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TEN and NAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NAT is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TEN's 0.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TEN currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs NAT's 91.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TENTsakos Energy Nav… | NATNordic American T… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | 0.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.14 | $6.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.02 | $2.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.8% | +91.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.0 | 58.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 504K | 5.3M |
Evenly matched — TEN and NAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TEN and NAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TEN as "Buy" and NAT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.8% upside for TEN (target: $50) vs -39.3% for NAT (target: $4). For income investors, NAT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.24% vs TEN's 5.64%.
| Metric | TENTsakos Energy Nav… | NATNordic American T… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.00 | $3.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.6% | +7.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.43 | $0.42 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% |
Evenly matched — TEN and NAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
TEN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NAT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Best OverallTsakos Energy Navigation Li… (TEN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TEN vs NAT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TEN or NAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the stronger pick with -9.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT). Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) offers the better valuation at 8. 6x trailing P/E (6. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TEN or NAT?
On trailing P/E, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the cheapest at 8.
6x versus Nordic American Tankers Limited at 26. 2x. On forward P/E, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited is actually cheaper at 6. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TEN or NAT?
Over the past 5 years, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) delivered a total return of +376.
2%, compared to +119. 8% for Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TEN returned +73. 7% versus NAT's -38. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TEN or NAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited's 0. 33β — meaning TEN is approximately 22% more volatile than NAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 100% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TEN or NAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is pulling ahead at -9.
6% versus -10. 7% for Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited grew EPS -44. 4% year-over-year, compared to -53. 2% for Nordic American Tankers Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, NAT leads at 21. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TEN or NAT?
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
9% net margin versus 13. 3% for Nordic American Tankers Limited — meaning it keeps 21. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TEN leads at 34. 6% versus 22. 1% for NAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TEN leads at 34. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TEN or NAT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) trades at 6.
4x forward P/E versus 10. 3x for Nordic American Tankers Limited — 3. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEN: 15. 8% to $50. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TEN or NAT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) offers the highest yield at 7. 2%, versus 5. 6% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN).
09Is TEN or NAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
33), 5. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TEN: +73. 7%, NAT: -38. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TEN and NAT?
These companies operate in different sectors (TEN (Energy) and NAT (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TEN is a small-cap deep-value stock; NAT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TEN: -9.7% · NAT: -8.8%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TEN: 8.6x · NAT: 26.2x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.