TEO
Telecom Argentina S.A.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$5.09B
5Y Perf.+37.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TEO vs TKC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TKC
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$5.79B
5Y Perf.+28.2%
TEO vs TKC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TEO | TKC |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $5.09B | $5.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.63T | $212.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-215.75B | $15.65B |
| Gross Margin | 74.7% | 27.6% |
| Operating Margin | 11.7% | 14.6% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 0.2x |
| Total Debt | $3.09T | $104.34B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $318.32B | $68.93B |
TEO vs TKC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TEO
TKC
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Telecom Argentina S… (TEO) | 100 | 137.6 | +37.6% |
| Turkcell Iletisim H… (TKC) | 100 | 128.2 | +28.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TEO vs TKC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TKC leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Telecom Argentina S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TEO
Telecom Argentina S.A.
The Growth Play
TEO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 100.9%, EPS growth 280.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.0%
- 4.3% 10Y total return vs TKC's -0.9%
- 100.9% revenue growth vs TKC's 55.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
TKC
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.
The Income Pick
TKC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 55.8%, current ratio 1.25x
- Beta 0.64, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.25x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TEO | 100.9% revenue growth vs TKC's 55.6% |
| Value | TEO | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | TKC | 7.4% margin vs TEO's -3.3% |
| Stability / Safety | TKC | Beta 0.64 vs TEO's 1.58, lower leverage |
| Dividends | TKC | 2.8% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TEO | +21.7% vs TKC's +15.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TKC | 3.7% ROA vs TEO's -1.6%, ROIC 11.8% vs -1.2% |
TEO vs TKC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2022
Segment breakdown not available.
TEO vs TKC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTKCLAGGINGTEO
TEOTelecom Argentina S.A.
1leads
TKCTurkcell Iletisim Hiz…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TEOMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TKC4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TKC9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TEO5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
TKC2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
TKC1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TKC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TEO is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.63T annually — 31.2x TKC's $212.6B. TKC is the more profitable business, keeping 7.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TEO's -3.3%. On growth, TEO holds the edge at +110.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TEOTelecom Argentina… | TKCTurkcell Iletisim… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.63T | $212.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.46T | $90.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$215.7B | $15.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$441.3B | $107M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.7% | +27.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +14.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | +7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | +0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +110.1% | +48.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.2% | -62.3% |
TKC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TEO and TKC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.0x trailing earnings, TEO trades at a 37% valuation discount to TKC's 11.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TKC's 4.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TEO's 8.5x.
| Metric | TEOTelecom Argentina… | TKCTurkcell Iletisim… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.1B | $5.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.1B | $6.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.02x | 11.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 0.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.20x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.48x | 4.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.72x | 1.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.28x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.04x | 10.03x |
Evenly matched — TEO and TKC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TKC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TKC delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-4 for TEO. TKC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TEO's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TKC scores 8/9 vs TEO's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TEOTelecom Argentina… | TKCTurkcell Iletisim… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.5% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.6% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.2% | +11.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.6% | +13.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.77T | $35.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $318.3B | $68.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.09T | $104.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -571.01x | 3.07x |
TKC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TEO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TEO five years ago would be worth $28,429 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,022 for TKC. Over the past 12 months, TEO leads with a +21.7% total return vs TKC's +15.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TEO at 35.1% vs TKC's 18.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TEOTelecom Argentina… | TKCTurkcell Iletisim… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.4% | +18.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.7% | +15.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +146.5% | +67.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +184.3% | +60.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.3% | -0.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.1% | +18.9% |
TEO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TKC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TKC is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TEO's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TKC currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs TEO's 85.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TEOTelecom Argentina… | TKCTurkcell Iletisim… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.58x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.81 | $7.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.43 | $5.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.6% | +92.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 57.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 267K | 1.1M |
TKC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
TKC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TEO as "Sell" and TKC as "Buy". TKC is the only dividend payer here at 2.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | TEOTelecom Argentina… | TKCTurkcell Iletisim… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.60 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $8.38 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
TKC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
TKC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TEO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallTurkcell Iletisim Hizmetler… (TKC)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TEO vs TKC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TEO or TKC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Telecom Argentina S.
A. (TEO) is the stronger pick with 100. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 55. 6% for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC). Telecom Argentina S. A. (TEO) offers the better valuation at 7. 0x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TEO or TKC?
On trailing P/E, Telecom Argentina S.
A. (TEO) is the cheapest at 7. 0x versus Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. at 11. 2x. On forward P/E, Telecom Argentina S. A. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TEO or TKC?
Over the past 5 years, Telecom Argentina S.
A. (TEO) delivered a total return of +184. 3%, compared to +60. 2% for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TEO returned +4. 3% versus TKC's -0. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TEO or TKC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.
S. (TKC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Telecom Argentina S. A. 's 1. 58β — meaning TEO is approximately 149% more volatile than TKC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 56% for Telecom Argentina S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TEO or TKC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Telecom Argentina S.
A. (TEO) is pulling ahead at 100. 9% versus 55. 6% for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. (TKC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Telecom Argentina S. A. grew EPS 280. 4% year-over-year, compared to 87. 6% for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TEO leads at 17. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TEO or TKC?
Telecom Argentina S.
A. (TEO) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 5% net margin versus 14. 1% for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. — meaning it keeps 24. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TKC leads at 21. 1% versus -3. 5% for TEO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TEO leads at 73. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TEO or TKC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Telecom Argentina S.
A. (TEO) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 0. 2x for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A. S. — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — TEO or TKC?
In this comparison, TKC (2.
8% yield) pays a dividend. TEO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TEO or TKC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.
S. (TKC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), 2. 8% yield). Telecom Argentina S. A. (TEO) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TKC: -0. 9%, TEO: +4. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TEO and TKC?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
TKC pays a dividend while TEO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 55%
- Gross Margin > 44%
Revenue Growth>
%
(TEO: 110.1% · TKC: 48.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TEO: 7.0x · TKC: 11.2x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.