TERN
Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$4.64B
5Y Perf.+133.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TERN vs DBVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$1721.78T
5Y Perf.-60.7%
TERN vs DBVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TERN | DBVT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $4.64B | $1721.78T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-94M | $-168M |
| Total Debt | $1M | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $161M | $194M |
TERN vs DBVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TERN
DBVT
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terns Pharmaceutica… (TERN) | 100 | 233.8 | +133.8% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 39.3 | -60.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TERN vs DBVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TERN leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TERN
Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Income Pick
TERN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.39
- EPS growth 11.8%
- 188.0% 10Y total return vs DBVT's -86.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
The Specific-Use Pick
In this particular matchup, DBVT is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TERN | -7.6% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% |
| Quality / Margins | TERN | 3.7% margin vs DBVT's 0.3% |
| Stability / Safety | TERN | Beta 0.39 vs DBVT's 1.26, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TERN | +16.6% vs DBVT's +114.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TERN | -28.5% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
TERN vs DBVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTERNLAGGINGDBVT
DBVTDBV Technologies S.A.
1leads
TERNTerns Pharmaceuticals…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs DBVTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
DBVT1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TERN5/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TERN6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
TERN2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DBVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TERN and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | TERNTerns Pharmaceuti… | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$108M | -$112M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$94M | -$168M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$78M | -$151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.6% | +91.5% |
DBVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TERN and DBVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | TERNTerns Pharmaceuti… | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.6B | $1721.78T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.5B | $1721.78T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -47.29x | -0.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.18x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — TERN and DBVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TERN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TERN delivers a -30.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-30 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. TERN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DBVT's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DBVT scores 4/9 vs TERN's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | TERNTerns Pharmaceuti… | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -30.0% | -130.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.5% | -89.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -42.2% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -33.7% | -145.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$160M | -$172M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $161M | $194M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -189.82x |
TERN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TERN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TERN five years ago would be worth $32,981 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,344 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, TERN leads with a +1659.7% total return vs DBVT's +114.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TERN at 59.1% vs DBVT's 6.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TERNTerns Pharmaceuti… | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.1% | +5.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1659.7% | +114.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +302.8% | +20.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +229.8% | -66.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +188.0% | -86.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +59.1% | +6.4% |
TERN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TERN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TERN is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TERN currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs DBVT's 76.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TERNTerns Pharmaceuti… | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.39x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.18 | $26.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.66 | $7.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +76.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.9 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.7M | 253K |
TERN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TERN as "Buy" and DBVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 130.5% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 4.9% for TERN (target: $56).
| Metric | TERNTerns Pharmaceuti… | DBVTDBV Technologies … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $55.56 | $46.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
TERN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). DBVT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
Best OverallTerns Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TERN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TERN vs DBVT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TERN or DBVT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TERN) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TERN or DBVT?
Over the past 5 years, Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TERN) delivered a total return of +229. 8%, compared to -66. 6% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TERN returned +188. 0% versus DBVT's -86. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TERN or DBVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TERN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 218% more volatile than TERN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TERN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 13% for DBV Technologies S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TERN or DBVT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
grew EPS 11. 8% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TERN or DBVT?
Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TERN) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TERN leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TERN leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TERN or DBVT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is TERN or DBVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TERN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +188. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TERN: +188. 0%, DBVT: -86. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TERN and DBVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.